Skip to content

Best Privacy Analytics of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Free-for-personal privacy analytics genuinely free up to 100K pageviews per month with EUPL-1.2 self-host.

BEST OVERALL7.9/10Save $48/yr

GoatCounter

Free-for-personal privacy analytics genuinely free up to 100K pageviews per month with EUPL-1.2 self-host.

Personal free forever (non-commercial)

How it stacks up

  • Personal free non-commercial

    vs Plausible mainstream

  • Business $5/mo

    vs Umami MIT

  • Single Go binary

    vs Pirsch EU funnels

#2
Plausible6.0/10

From $9/mo

View
#3
Matomo5.8/10

From $23/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingScore
1GoatCounterBest free-for-personal privacy analytics under EUPL-1.2$5.00/mo7.9/10
2PlausibleBest modern mainstream privacy analytics with AGPL-3 self-host$9.00/mo6.0/10
3MatomoBest enterprise self-hostable analytics with 100+ plugins and GA4 import$23.00/mo5.8/10
4Simple AnalyticsBest clean Dutch privacy analytics with goal tracking and funnels$9.00/mo5.5/10
5PirschBest EU-hosted privacy analytics with funnels and on-premise option$6.00/mo5.5/10
6Fathom AnalyticsBest premium US-base privacy analytics with EU isolation option$15.00/mo5.4/10
7UmamiBest MIT open-source privacy analytics with Postgres or MySQL backend$20.00/mo5.2/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Top spec
#1GoatCounter7.9/10$5.00/mo$60.00/yrSave $48/yrPersonal free non-commercial
#2Plausible6.0/10$19.00/mo$190.00/yr$120/yr moreGrowth (10K) $9/mo
#3Matomo5.8/10$129.00/mo$1,548.00/yr$1,440/yr moreOn-Premise GPL-3 free
#4Simple Analytics5.5/10$59.00/mo$590.00/yr$600/yr moreStarter $9/mo 100K
#5Pirsch5.5/10$36.00/mo$432.00/yr$324/yr moreHobby $6/mo 100K
#6Fathom Analytics5.4/10$84.00/mo$840.00/yr$900/yr moreStarter $15/mo 100K
#7Umami5.2/10$20.00/mo$240.00/yr$132/yr moreCloud Hobby free 100K
#1

GoatCounter

7.9/10Save $48/yr

Best free-for-personal privacy analytics under EUPL-1.2

Free-for-personal privacy analytics genuinely free up to 100K pageviews per month with EUPL-1.2 self-host.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Personal (free)FreeGenuinely free for personal and non-commercial use up to 100K pageviews per month.
Business Starter$5.00/mo$60.00/yrCheapest paid tier in the category at the entry monthly for commercial use.
Self-hostedFree$0.00/yrEUPL-1.2 self-host as a single Go binary with active maintenance.

GoatCounter is the free-for-personal privacy analytics platform for indie developers, hobbyist bloggers, and non-commercial site owners whose budget is zero. Founded 2019 by Martin Tournoij as an independent project, GoatCounter built around the thesis that small personal sites should not need to pay for analytics under reasonable traffic, with a single Go binary and EUPL-1.2 license as the foundations.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Personal is genuinely free for non-commercial use up to 100K pageviews per month. Business Starter is the cheapest paid tier in the category for commercial use. Self-hosted is EUPL-1.2 as a single Go binary with no usage limits and active maintenance.

The load-bearing wedge is the genuine free-for-personal tier plus the single-Go-binary deployment. Where Plausible Cloud has no permanent free tier and Umami Cloud Hobby caps at 100K events, GoatCounter Personal covers 100K pageviews with no time limit for non-commercial use; for indie bloggers and hobbyist sites, the math runs at zero indefinitely. The catch is the lack of funnel tracking and the smaller feature set; GoatCounter does pageviews, referrers, and goals well but skips heavier reporting features.

Pros

  • Genuinely free for personal use up to 100K pageviews
  • Cheapest paid tier in the category for commercial use
  • Single Go binary deployment (smallest footprint)
  • EUPL-1.2 self-host with no usage limits
  • Active independent maintenance since 2019

Cons

  • No funnel tracking; not for conversion optimization workflows
  • Smaller feature set than Plausible or Matomo for advanced reporting
Personal free non-commercialBusiness $5/moSingle Go binaryPersonal free forever (non-commercial)

Best for: Indie bloggers, hobbyist site owners, and non-commercial projects under 100K monthly pageviews wanting genuinely free analytics.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
10
Setup overhead
10
Value
10
Support
7
#2

Plausible

6.0/10$120/yr more

Best modern mainstream privacy analytics with AGPL-3 self-host

Modern mainstream privacy analytics with AGPL-3 self-host plus Cloud since 2018 and the broadest community recognition.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free trialFree30 days free with all Cloud features and no card required for one site.
Growth (10K)$9.00/mo$90.00/yrEntry monthly for up to 10K pageviews across 10 sites with no consent banner needed.
Growth (100K)$19.00/mo$190.00/yrSame feature set scaled to 100K monthly pageviews.
Business (100K)$59.00/mo$590.00/yrCustom properties and funnels across 50 sites with priority support.
Self-hosted (Community)Free$0.00/yrAGPL-3 self-host on your own infrastructure with no usage limits.

Plausible is the modern mainstream privacy analytics platform for marketing and developer teams whose evaluation defaults to the platform with the broadest community recognition and a clean lightweight script. Founded 2018 in Tallinn, Plausible built around the thesis that privacy analytics should ship as a small open-source script (under 1KB) with no cookies, no fingerprinting, and a single-page dashboard.

Five tiers serve five buyers. Free trial covers 30 days with all Cloud features. Growth (10K) is the entry monthly for 10K pageviews across 10 sites. Growth (100K) scales to 100K. Business adds custom properties and funnels for 50 sites with priority support. Self-hosted is AGPL-3 with no usage limits.

The load-bearing wedge is community recognition plus the dual Cloud-and-self-host model. Where Fathom is Cloud-only and Matomo trends enterprise-heavy, Plausible offers the same dashboard whether you pay for Cloud or self-host the AGPL-3 binary; for teams that want to start on Cloud and migrate to self-host later, the path is a documented data-export. The catch is the AGPL-3 license restricts commercial derivative work; if you plan to wrap Plausible inside a SaaS product, the license obligations matter.

Pros

  • Broadest community recognition among modern privacy analytics since 2018
  • AGPL-3 self-host with the same dashboard as Cloud
  • Lightweight script under 1KB compressed
  • Funnels and custom properties on Business tier
  • EU-hosted (Germany) with no consent banner needed

Cons

  • AGPL-3 license restricts commercial derivative work
  • Higher Growth pricing than GoatCounter or Pirsch at 100K pageviews
Growth (10K) $9/moAGPL-3 self-host1KB script30-day Cloud trial; Self-hosted free forever

Best for: Marketing and developer teams wanting modern privacy analytics with clean dashboards and a documented Cloud-to-self-host migration path.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
10
Setup overhead
10
Value
9
Support
9
#3

Matomo

5.8/10$1,440/yr more

Best enterprise self-hostable analytics with 100+ plugins and GA4 import

Enterprise legacy self-hostable analytics (formerly Piwik) with 100+ plugins, heatmaps, and GA4 import.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
On-PremiseFreeGPL-3 self-host with full feature set, no usage limits, and 100+ plugins.
Cloud Essential$23.00/mo$276.00/yrEU-hosted Cloud entry monthly for up to 100K hits with full feature set.
Cloud Business$129.00/mo$1,548.00/yrCloud monthly for up to 1M hits with priority support and uptime SLA.
Enterprise$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yrCustom quote for high-volume deployments with on-prem support, SSO, and dedicated CSM.

Matomo is the enterprise legacy self-hostable analytics platform for organizations whose evaluation centers on the deepest feature set and GA4 migration tooling. Founded 2007 in New Zealand as Piwik and rebranded Matomo in 2018, Matomo built the canonical open-source Google Analytics alternative with the broadest plugin ecosystem in the category, including heatmaps, session recordings, and A/B test add-ons.

Four tiers serve four buyers. On-Premise is GPL-3 with full feature set and the 100+ plugin ecosystem. Cloud Essential is the EU-hosted Cloud entry monthly with GA4 import and cookieless mode. Cloud Business scales to 1M hits with priority support. Enterprise opens on-prem support, SSO, and dedicated CSM at custom quote.

The load-bearing wedge is feature depth plus the GA4 import path. Where the other six picks ship lightweight modern dashboards with intentionally narrower feature sets, Matomo ships the closest functional GA4 replacement with heatmaps, session recordings, and A/B test plugins all in one platform; for organizations migrating from Universal Analytics or GA4 with session-level dependencies, Matomo is the only platform that covers the surface area. The catch is the heavier UI and slower default dashboards than the modern lightweight competitors.

Pros

  • 100+ plugins including heatmaps, session recordings, and A/B testing
  • GA4 import path is the most documented in the category
  • GPL-3 self-host with no usage limits
  • EU-hosted Cloud with German data residency
  • Founded 2007 with the longest privacy-analytics track record

Cons

  • Heavier UI than Plausible, Umami, or GoatCounter
  • Higher monthly pricing on Cloud than the modern lightweight competitors
On-Premise GPL-3 freeCloud Essential ~$23/mo100+ plugins21-day Cloud trial; On-Premise free forever

Best for: Organizations migrating from GA4 or Universal Analytics needing session recordings, heatmaps, and A/B testing alongside cookieless analytics.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
7
Setup overhead
7
Value
8
Support
9
#4

Simple Analytics

5.5/10$600/yr more

Best clean Dutch privacy analytics with goal tracking and funnels

Clean Dutch privacy analytics with the cleanest UI in the category and Dutch jurisdiction since 2018.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free trialFree14 days free with all Starter features and no card required.
Starter$9.00/mo$90.00/yrDutch-base entry monthly for 100K events with goal tracking across 5 sites.
Business$59.00/mo$590.00/yrCloud monthly for 1M events with funnels, custom events, and email reports.
Enterprise$250.00/mo$3,000.00/yrCustom pricing for higher event volume with white-label and dedicated support.

Simple Analytics is the Dutch privacy analytics platform for marketing teams whose evaluation prioritizes UI clarity above feature breadth. Founded 2018 in the Netherlands, Simple Analytics built around the thesis that analytics dashboards should fit on one screen with the most-used metrics at the top, with goals and funnels as the primary depth features rather than the heavyweight session-recording or heatmap add-ons.

Four tiers serve four buyers. Free trial covers 14 days with all Starter features. Starter is Dutch-base entry monthly for 100K events with goal tracking across 5 sites. Business covers 1M events with funnels, custom events, and email reports. Enterprise opens higher event volume with white-label and dedicated support.

The load-bearing wedge is UI clarity plus Dutch jurisdiction. Where Plausible and Matomo ship richer dashboards and Fathom prices higher for similar feature breadth, Simple Analytics ships the cleanest single-screen dashboard with the explicit Dutch-jurisdiction privacy posture; for marketing teams that value scannability above feature completeness, the UI matters. The catch is the smaller community than Plausible and the lack of self-host option; Simple Analytics is Cloud-only.

Pros

  • Cleanest single-screen dashboard in the category
  • Dutch jurisdiction with EU data residency
  • Goal tracking on Starter; funnels and custom events on Business
  • Email reports on Business tier
  • White-label option on Enterprise

Cons

  • No self-host option; Cloud-only commits to Simple Analytics B.V.
  • Smaller community than Plausible for plugins and integrations
Starter $9/mo 100KBusiness $59/mo 1MDutch jurisdiction14-day Cloud trial; no card required

Best for: Marketing teams that value dashboard scannability and Dutch jurisdiction over feature breadth or self-host options.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
10
Setup overhead
10
Value
8
Support
8
#5

Pirsch

5.5/10$324/yr more

Best EU-hosted privacy analytics with funnels and on-premise option

German-base privacy analytics with funnel tracking, custom domains, and on-premise option on Enterprise.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free trialFree30 days free with all Hobby features and no card required.
Hobby$6.00/mo$72.00/yrEU-hosted (Germany) entry monthly for 100K pageviews with goal and funnel tracking.
Business$36.00/mo$432.00/yrCloud monthly for 1M pageviews with custom domains and higher rate limits.
Enterprise$200.00/mo$2,400.00/yrCustom pricing for higher tiers with on-premise option and dedicated support.

Pirsch is the German-base privacy analytics platform for marketing teams whose evaluation prioritizes German jurisdiction, funnel tracking, and the option to bring tracking on-premise at higher tiers. Founded 2020 in Germany by Emvi Software, Pirsch built around the thesis that EU privacy analytics should default to German hosting (the strictest GDPR interpretation) with funnel tracking and custom tracking domains as the primary depth features.

Four tiers serve four buyers. Free trial covers 30 days with all Hobby features and a 5K pageviews limit. Hobby covers 100K pageviews across 5 sites at the entry monthly rate. Business scales to 1M pageviews with custom domains for tracking and higher rate limits. Enterprise opens on-premise option and higher pageview tiers with dedicated support.

The load-bearing wedge is German jurisdiction plus the on-premise upgrade path. Where Plausible self-host requires AGPL-3 obligations and Matomo on-prem requires GPL-3, Pirsch Enterprise offers an on-premise option as a paid commercial license without copyleft obligations; for German enterprises with strict procurement around data residency and license-encumbrance, the option matters. The catch is the smaller community than Plausible and the higher Hobby pricing than GoatCounter for the same 100K pageview cap.

Pros

  • German jurisdiction (strictest GDPR interpretation)
  • Funnel tracking on Hobby tier
  • Custom tracking domains on Business
  • On-premise option on Enterprise (no copyleft license)
  • Goal tracking plus event tracking included

Cons

  • Smaller community than Plausible for plugins and integrations
  • Higher Hobby pricing than GoatCounter for the same 100K pageview cap
Hobby $6/mo 100KBusiness $36/mo 1MOn-prem on Enterprise30-day Cloud trial; no card required

Best for: German enterprises and DACH-region marketing teams needing strict German jurisdiction with on-premise upgrade path.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
10
Setup overhead
9
Value
8
Support
8
#6

Fathom Analytics

5.4/10$900/yr more

Best premium US-base privacy analytics with EU isolation option

Premium US-base privacy analytics with Canadian jurisdiction and EU isolation option for North American buyers.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free trialFree7 days free with all Cloud features and no card required.
Starter (100K)$15.00/mo$150.00/yrPremium US/Canada-base monthly for 100K pageviews with EU isolation option.
Pro (1M)$84.00/mo$840.00/yrCloud monthly for 1M pageviews with email reports and uptime monitoring.
Enterprise (10M+)$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yrCustom pricing for higher pageview tiers with dedicated CSM.

Fathom Analytics is the premium US/Canada-base privacy analytics platform for marketing teams whose procurement values North American jurisdiction with optional EU data isolation. Founded 2018 by Conva Ventures in British Columbia, Fathom built around the thesis that privacy analytics should ship at premium pricing with Canadian jurisdiction as a default and EU isolation as an opt-in for European traffic.

Four tiers serve four buyers. Free trial covers 7 days with all Cloud features. Starter covers 100K monthly pageviews with unlimited sites and EU isolation option at the entry monthly rate. Pro scales to 1M pageviews with email reports and uptime monitoring. Enterprise opens higher pageview tiers with dedicated CSM at custom contract.

The load-bearing wedge is North American jurisdiction plus the EU isolation toggle. Where Plausible defaults to EU hosting and Matomo Cloud is German-only, Fathom defaults to Canada and lets buyers opt into EU isolation per site; for North American organizations whose privacy posture emphasizes Canadian-jurisdiction control with optional EU compliance, the toggle matters. The catch is the higher pricing across all tiers than Plausible, Umami, or GoatCounter; Fathom is the most expensive Cloud-only option in the category at every pageview tier.

Pros

  • Canadian jurisdiction with EU isolation option per site
  • Email reports plus uptime monitoring on Pro
  • Strong Indie Hackers and Twitter community since 2018
  • No-script-loaded fallback option for AdBlock-bypass
  • Annual pricing discount across tiers

Cons

  • Most expensive Cloud-only option at every pageview tier
  • No self-host option; Cloud-only commits you to Conva Ventures
Starter $15/mo 100KPro $84/mo 1MCanadian jurisdiction7-day Cloud trial; no card required

Best for: North American marketing teams valuing Canadian jurisdiction with optional EU isolation and willing to pay premium pricing.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
10
Setup overhead
10
Value
7
Support
9
#7

Umami

5.2/10$132/yr more

Best MIT open-source privacy analytics with Postgres or MySQL backend

MIT open-source privacy analytics with Postgres or MySQL backend; freer license than Plausible for derivative work.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
OSS (self-hosted)FreeMIT licensed self-host with Postgres or MySQL backend and no usage limits.
Cloud HobbyFreeFree Cloud tier with 100K events per month across 3 websites.
Cloud Pro$20.00/mo$240.00/yrCloud monthly with 1M events, unlimited sites, funnels, and retention.
Cloud Enterprise$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrCustom pricing with higher event volume and premium support.

Umami is the MIT open-source privacy analytics platform for engineering teams whose evaluation centers on license freedom and backend choice. Founded 2020, Umami built around the thesis that analytics should ship as an MIT-licensed self-host that engineers can wrap inside other products without AGPL-3 obligations, with Postgres or MySQL as the database choice rather than a vendor-locked storage layer.

Four tiers serve four buyers. OSS (self-hosted) is MIT licensed with Postgres or MySQL backend and no usage limits. Cloud Hobby covers 100K events per month across 3 websites for free. Cloud Pro covers 1M events per month across unlimited sites with funnels and retention reports. Cloud Enterprise opens custom event volume and premium support at custom enterprise quote.

The load-bearing wedge is the MIT license plus the database flexibility. Where Plausible AGPL-3 forces source-release of modifications and Matomo GPL-3 is similar, Umami's MIT license lets engineering teams embed analytics inside SaaS products without license-encumbrance; for derivative-work scenarios (white-labeled analytics dashboards, embedded reporting), MIT is the only license that fits cleanly. The catch is the smaller community than Plausible and the lack of GA4 import tooling, which makes migration from Google Analytics rougher.

Pros

  • MIT license is the freest in the category for derivative work
  • Postgres or MySQL backend (your choice)
  • Cloud Hobby Free covers 100K events per month
  • Funnels and retention on Cloud Pro
  • Self-host with no usage limits

Cons

  • Smaller community than Plausible for plugins and integrations
  • No GA4 import tooling; migration from Google Analytics is manual
Cloud Hobby free 100KCloud Pro $20/mo 1MMIT licenseCloud Hobby free; OSS self-host free forever

Best for: Engineering teams embedding analytics in derivative products where AGPL-3 obligations would force source-release of proprietary modifications.

Privacy posture
10
Dashboard latency
9
Setup overhead
9
Value
10
Support
8

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

We weight price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. GoatCounter wins composite at 7.994 on cheapest paid; everyone else ties at 5.550. Plausible wins brand recognition for modern privacy analytics; pinned #1 from composite tied tail. Matomo typical-tier overshoots to Cloud Business $129 because of name match; the Cloud Essential entry runs at the cheapest paid tier band.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best modern mainstream privacy analytics

Plausible

Read the full review →

Best MIT open-source privacy analytics

Umami

Read the full review →

Best free-for-personal privacy analytics

GoatCounter

Read the full review →

Best enterprise self-hostable privacy analytics

Matomo

Read the full review →

Best premium US-base privacy analytics

Fathom Analytics

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the GA4 import path; Matomo is the only platform here with documented Universal Analytics and GA4 migration tooling for historical data.

Already in picks (second). Worth flagging the MIT license; if you embed analytics inside a derivative SaaS product, Umami is the only Cloud-and-self-host option without copyleft obligations.

Already in picks (third). Worth flagging that GoatCounter Personal is genuinely free for non-commercial use up to 100K pageviews with no time limit, unlike trials at most competitors.

Already in picks (seventh). Worth flagging the on-premise option; Pirsch Enterprise ships an on-prem commercial license without GPL or AGPL copyleft obligations.

How to choose your Privacy Analytics

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best privacy analytics' search covers seven distinct shapes. Modern mainstream (Plausible) targets marketing and developer teams wanting clean Cloud-or-self-host with the broadest community. Open-source MIT (Umami) targets engineering teams embedding analytics in derivative SaaS products. Free-for-personal (GoatCounter) targets indie bloggers and non-commercial sites under 100K monthly pageviews. Enterprise legacy self-host (Matomo) targets organizations needing GA4 migration with heatmaps and session recordings. Premium US-base (Fathom) targets North American marketing teams valuing Canadian jurisdiction. Simple Dutch (Simple Analytics) targets teams prioritizing dashboard scannability. EU-hosted with funnels (Pirsch) targets German enterprises with on-premise upgrade path. The honest framework: identify your traffic profile, your jurisdiction needs, and whether you need self-host.

Self-host versus Cloud is the load-bearing decision

Self-host versus Cloud trades hosting overhead for unlimited usage. Plausible AGPL-3, Umami MIT, GoatCounter EUPL-1.2, Matomo GPL-3, and Pirsch Enterprise (paid commercial license) all offer self-host. Fathom and Simple Analytics are Cloud-only. The honest framework: self-host makes sense when you have engineering capacity to manage Postgres or MySQL, traffic exceeds 1M pageviews per month (where Cloud pricing crosses the break-even with hosting costs), and you want unlimited usage with no pricing-tier ceiling. Cloud makes sense when traffic stays under 1M pageviews, you want zero ops overhead, and the monthly bill is acceptable. For most sites under 100K pageviews per month, Cloud is the rational entry; for high-traffic content publishers, self-host typically pays for itself within 6-12 months.

License choice matters for derivative work

License choice matters when you embed analytics inside another product. Plausible is AGPL-3, which requires source-release of any modifications you ship to users (including SaaS deployments). Matomo is GPL-3 with similar copyleft. GoatCounter is EUPL-1.2, a more permissive European Union Public License. Umami is MIT, the freest license in the category with no copyleft obligation. Pirsch on-prem is a paid commercial license with no copyleft. The honest framework: for internal-use analytics on your own sites, license choice matters less; AGPL-3 obligations only fire if you ship modifications to users. For derivative SaaS products embedding analytics, MIT (Umami) or commercial-license self-host (Pirsch) are the only options that avoid copyleft entanglement. Read the licenses before committing.

Cookieless does not equal personal-data-free

Cookieless analytics avoids the cookie-based identifier problem but does not automatically avoid all personal data collection. Some platforms hash visitor IPs server-side to compute unique-visitor counts; CNIL (the French DPA) has periodically flagged hashed-IP approaches as still constituting personal-data processing under GDPR. Plausible, Fathom, GoatCounter, and Pirsch process visitor IPs through hashing then discard them. Matomo offers a strict cookieless mode with IP anonymization. Umami and Simple Analytics use similar hashing approaches. The honest framework: under most EU/UK interpretations, all seven picks here let you skip a consent banner; under the strictest CNIL guidance, you may still need a banner for the brief moment IPs are processed. Verify with your DPO if your jurisdiction has aggressive enforcement.

When Plausible wins versus Matomo versus GoatCounter by use case

Plausible versus Matomo versus GoatCounter is the load-bearing decision for most readers. Plausible wins when (1) you want modern dashboard ergonomics with the broadest community, (2) Cloud-to-self-host migration optionality matters, (3) AGPL-3 obligations are acceptable for your use. Matomo wins when (1) you migrate from GA4 with feature dependencies on session recordings, heatmaps, or A/B testing, (2) deepest plugin ecosystem matters, (3) GPL-3 self-host is acceptable. GoatCounter wins when (1) you run a personal or non-commercial site under 100K monthly pageviews, (2) the Free tier needs to be permanent rather than time-limited, (3) you accept the smaller feature set without funnels. The honest framework: modern-mainstream defaults to Plausible; GA4-migration defaults to Matomo; indie-personal defaults to GoatCounter.

When to skip privacy analytics and run GA4 instead

Privacy analytics are not a universal answer. GA4 still wins when (1) you need integration with Google Ads conversion tracking, audience signals, or Display campaign optimization (privacy analytics platforms cannot match this depth), (2) you run an ad-supported business model where GA4 attribution drives revenue, (3) your marketing team's existing skill set is GA4-specific. The honest framework: privacy analytics fit content sites, SaaS marketing pages, indie projects, and EU-jurisdiction-strict deployments; GA4 still fits ad-monetized sites, ecommerce stores running Google Ads, and any business model where Google Ads conversion tracking is the primary attribution model. Some teams run both: GA4 with consent for advertising, plus a privacy analytics tool for the cookieless baseline. Many EU sites adopted this dual-stack pattern after the post-GDPR consent-rate collapse left GA4 dashboards undercounting traffic.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

Mid-market pricing is publicly listed and stable; figures here are accurate as of May 2026. Plausible Growth/Business, Umami Cloud Pro, GoatCounter Business Starter, Matomo Cloud Essential/Business, Fathom Starter/Pro, Simple Analytics Starter/Business, and Pirsch Hobby/Business all have public flat pricing. Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted. Self-host options are free forever for the binary itself.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Plausible ranked first instead of GoatCounter?

GoatCounter wins composite math at 7.994 on the cheapest paid tier ($5/mo). Plausible ties with five other picks at 5.550. Plausible still ranks first because the head-term reader for "best privacy analytics" is mostly a marketing or developer professional evaluating modern Cloud-or-self-host platforms, where Plausible leads brand recognition since 2018; GoatCounter sits at #3 for the indie-and-personal niche audience. Plausible uniquely matches the modern-mainstream tile.

Should I pick Plausible or Matomo?

Pick by feature depth requirements. Plausible wins when you want clean dashboards, modern ergonomics, and a documented Cloud-to-self-host migration path. Matomo wins when you migrate from GA4 with feature dependencies on session recordings, heatmaps, or A/B testing. The decision tree: modern-clean defaults to Plausible; GA4-feature-parity defaults to Matomo. Both ship self-host.

When does Umami beat Plausible?

When license matters for derivative work. Umami's MIT license lets you embed analytics inside a derivative SaaS product without source-release obligations. Plausible AGPL-3 requires you to release modifications under AGPL-3 if you ship the modified product to users, including SaaS. For internal-use analytics on your own sites, the license difference is invisible. For embedded analytics inside white-label SaaS products, Umami is the only choice.

Why aren't PostHog, Mixpanel, or Amplitude in the picks?

PostHog is a credible product analytics platform with privacy-friendly self-host but ships heavier event-tracking semantics; PostHog belongs in /best/product-analytics-tools. Mixpanel and Amplitude are full product analytics with cookied event tracking and personal-data processing that does not fit the privacy-analytics category. All three are reasonable for product-analytics evaluations; none fit the cookieless-pageview question this guide answers.

Will privacy analytics break my Google Ads conversion tracking?

Yes. Privacy analytics platforms do not integrate with Google Ads conversion tracking, audience signals, or Display campaign optimization at the depth GA4 provides. If your business model relies on Google Ads attribution, you need GA4 (with consent under EU jurisdictions) for the advertising side, optionally alongside a privacy analytics tool for the cookieless baseline. Many EU sites run this dual stack after the post-GDPR consent-rate collapse undercounted GA4 traffic dashboards.

How hard is it to switch from Google Analytics to a privacy analytics platform?

Moderate. Matomo offers the most documented GA4 import path, including historical data import. Plausible, Umami, GoatCounter, Fathom, Simple Analytics, and Pirsch all offer Google Analytics import at varying depth but typically only for recent data. The bigger challenge is reconfiguring tag manager containers, retraining marketing teams on new dashboards, and rebuilding any custom report or BigQuery integrations. Plan two to four weeks of engineering work plus marketing-team retraining.

Do I really need a consent banner if I use Plausible or Fathom?

Under most EU/UK regulator interpretations as of May 2026, no. All seven picks advertise that they do not require GDPR consent banners under standard interpretations. CNIL (the French DPA) has issued the strictest guidance and occasionally flagged hashed-IP processing; verify with your DPO if your jurisdiction has aggressive enforcement. For most non-French EU deployments, cookieless genuinely skips the banner.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes, CNIL guidance updates on cookieless analytics, Plausible self-host license changes (AGPL-3 to a different license), Matomo IPO or acquisition discussions, GA4 deprecation or feature changes affecting the migration path, ePrivacy Regulation EU adoption (still pending). The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Privacy Analytics you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides