Skip to content

Best Billing Platforms of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

OSS-creator-friendly merchant of record at 4% plus 40c with GitHub-native flow.

BEST OVERALL7.1/10

Polar

OSS-creator-friendly merchant of record at 4% plus 40c with GitHub-native flow.

No fixed monthly; per-transaction fee

How it stacks up

  • MoR 4% + 40c

    vs Paddle higher-fee MoR

  • GitHub-native

    vs Stripe Billing self-tax

  • Single tier

    vs Lago OSS self-host

#2
Stripe Billing6.0/10

Free

View
#3
Chargebee5.2/10

From $599/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1PolarBest OSS-creator-friendly merchant of record at lower MoR feeFree7.1/10
2Stripe BillingBest mainstream billing platform layered on Stripe Payments6.0/10
3ChargebeeBest flat-rate subscription management with predictable monthly fees$599.00/mo5.2/10
4PaddleBest merchant-of-record billing handling tax plus fraud globally4.9/10
5LagoBest OSS self-hostable billing engine under Apache 2.0$500.00/mo4.9/10
6RecurlyBest institutional subscription management with fixed monthly tiers$199.00/mo3.4/10
7OrbBest usage-based-first billing engine for AI plus infrastructure$1,500.00/mo3.3/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Polar7.1/10FreeMoR 4% + 40c
#2Stripe Billing6.0/10Standard 0.5%
#3Chargebee5.2/10$1,499.00/mo$15,600/yr moreFree under $250K
#4Paddle4.9/10MoR 5% + 50c
#5Lago4.9/10$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yr$3,612/yr moreOSS self-host free
#6Recurly3.4/10$399.00/mo$4,788.00/yr$2,400/yr moreCore $199/mo
#7Orb3.3/10$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yr$15,612/yr moreAnnual contract
#1

Polar

7.1/10

Best OSS-creator-friendly merchant of record at lower MoR fee

OSS-creator-friendly merchant of record at 4% plus 40c with GitHub-native flow.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
Open source friendlyFree4% plus 40c per transaction MoR; GitHub-native for OSS maintainers.

Polar is the GitHub-native merchant of record for OSS maintainers and indie creators. Founded in 2022 in San Francisco, Polar positioned around the OSS-creator shape with the lowest MoR percentage in the lineup and tight GitHub integration; the platform reads from your GitHub org, lets you sponsor maintainers, and handles the merchant-of-record paperwork for sponsorships and product sales.

One tier serves the audience. Open source friendly ships at 4% plus 40c per transaction MoR with subscriptions, one-time products, GitHub-native for OSS maintainers, and tax handled.

The load-bearing wedge is the lower MoR fee plus GitHub-native flow. Where Paddle charges 5% plus 50c, Polar charges 4% plus 40c, which compounds favorably for high-volume OSS sponsorship products. The GitHub integration is the differentiator; if your project is hosted on GitHub and you accept sponsorships or sell access to private repos, Polar wires up in minutes versus Paddle's more general-purpose merchant flow. The catch is the smaller feature surface for traditional SaaS; Polar lacks the dunning, multi-currency, and revenue recognition depth of Stripe Billing or Chargebee. For OSS maintainers and indie creators on GitHub, Polar is the best-fit MoR; for traditional SaaS, Paddle covers the broader use case.

Pros

  • Lowest MoR percentage in lineup at 4% plus 40c
  • GitHub-native for OSS maintainers
  • Single tier; simple pricing without volume thresholds
  • Subscriptions plus one-time products
  • Tax handled by merchant-of-record model

Cons

  • Smaller feature surface than Stripe Billing or Chargebee for traditional SaaS
  • No SAML SSO or audit logs for institutional buyers
MoR 4% + 40cGitHub-nativeSingle tierNo fixed monthly; per-transaction fee

Best for: OSS maintainers and indie creators on GitHub. 4% + 40c per transaction MoR; tax handled by merchant-of-record; GitHub-native flow.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
9
Setup complexity
10
Value
9
Support
7
#2

Stripe Billing

6.0/10

Best mainstream billing platform layered on Stripe Payments

Mainstream percentage-of-revenue billing layered on top of Stripe Payments.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
StandardFree0.5% on recurring revenue plus standard Stripe payment fees.
ScaleFree0.8% on recurring with quote-to-cash plus revenue recognition.

Stripe Billing is the default for SaaS already on Stripe Payments. Released in 2018, it built the deepest integration with Stripe's payment rails and serves the largest mainstream billing market with the deepest brand recognition.

Two tiers serve two buyer profiles. Standard ships at half a percent on recurring plus standard Stripe payment fees, with subscription management, Smart Retries, and Tax (Stripe Tax sold separately). Scale ships at roughly two-thirds higher percentage with quote-to-cash, revenue recognition, and custom invoicing for institutional teams.

The load-bearing wedge is how naturally Stripe Billing folds into SaaS already running on Stripe Payments. If your card transactions already flow through Stripe, Stripe Billing layers on top without a second vendor relationship; the dashboard, API, and dispute workflows are unified. The catch is the percentage-on-recurring fee compounds against margin as you scale; high-volume SaaS at $10M+ ARR can pay six figures yearly to Stripe Billing alone. For SaaS founders already on Stripe Payments wanting one-vendor billing, Stripe Billing is the no-brainer entry; for teams scaling past $5M ARR, factor percentage compounding into unit economics.

Pros

  • Deepest integration with Stripe Payments rails
  • Smart Retries plus dunning on Standard
  • Quote-to-cash plus revenue recognition on Scale
  • Unified dashboard and API for payments + billing
  • Mainstream brand for SaaS investor due diligence

Cons

  • Percentage-on-recurring compounds against margin at scale
  • Stripe Tax sold separately; total platform cost climbs fast
Standard 0.5%Scale 0.8%No fixed monthlyNo free tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: SaaS founders already on Stripe Payments wanting one-vendor billing. Standard at 0.5% on recurring; Scale at 0.8% with revenue recognition.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
9
Setup complexity
10
Value
7
Support
9
#3

Chargebee

5.2/10$15,600/yr more

Best flat-rate subscription management with predictable monthly fees

Flat-rate subscription management with predictable monthly fees plus generous free tier.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
LaunchFreeFree up to $250K annual revenue; subscription management plus self-serve portal.
Rise$599.00/moFlat monthly fee plus add-on management plus multi-currency plus workflows.
Scale$1,499.00/moCustom plans, entitlements, quote-to-cash, tax engine, API extensions.

Chargebee is the flat-rate subscription management platform for SaaS that wants predictable monthly fees instead of percentage-on-revenue. Founded in 2011 in Chennai, Chargebee built the broadest payment-gateway support in subscription mgmt (Stripe, Razorpay, Braintree, and dozens more).

Three tiers serve three buyer profiles. Launch is free for SaaS under $250K ARR with subscription management plus self-serve portal. Rise at the upgrade tier ships add-on management plus multi-currency plus workflows. Scale at the institutional tier ships custom plans, entitlements, quote-to-cash, tax engine, API extensions.

The load-bearing wedge is the flat-rate pricing model that scales predictably. Where Stripe Billing and Paddle compound against revenue as a percentage, Chargebee charges a fixed monthly fee that does not grow with ARR; a SaaS at $5M ARR pays the same Rise tier as a SaaS at $1M ARR. The catch is the higher entry monthly fee versus percentage-only platforms; Rise is roughly six times the cost of Stripe Billing for a SaaS doing $1M ARR at typical gross-margin. For SaaS expecting to scale past $1M ARR with healthy margins, Chargebee Launch is the no-brainer free entry; Rise pays back as percentage models compound.

Pros

  • Free Launch tier up to $250K ARR; broad payment-gateway support
  • Flat monthly fee scales predictably with ARR
  • Multi-currency plus workflows on Rise
  • Quote-to-cash plus tax engine on Scale
  • Stripe + Razorpay + Braintree + dozens more

Cons

  • Higher entry monthly fee than Stripe Billing for sub-$1M ARR
  • Smaller mainstream brand than Stripe in investor due diligence
Free under $250KRise $599/moScale $1499/moFree under $250K ARR; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: SaaS expecting to scale past $1M ARR with healthy margins. Free Launch under $250K; Rise $599/mo annual; Scale $1499/mo with quote-to-cash.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
9
Setup complexity
8
Value
9
Support
8
#4

Paddle

4.9/10

Best merchant-of-record billing handling tax plus fraud globally

Merchant-of-record billing handling tax and fraud globally as the merchant of record.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
Merchant of RecordFree5% plus 50c per transaction; tax handled globally as merchant of record.
Custom volumeCustomVolume-discounted rates with negotiated terms above $1M ARR.

Paddle is the merchant-of-record billing platform for SaaS that wants to offload global tax compliance and fraud. Founded in 2012 in London and backed by KKR, Paddle acts as the legal merchant of record; the platform collects, files, and remits VAT, GST, and sales tax across 200+ jurisdictions while you receive a single net payout.

Two tiers serve two buyer profiles. Merchant of Record ships at 5% plus 50c per transaction with global tax handling, subscriptions, one-time, and risk plus fraud handled. Custom volume ships volume-discounted rates with negotiated terms above $1M ARR.

The load-bearing wedge is the merchant-of-record model. Where Stripe Billing, Chargebee, Recurly, Lago, and Orb require you to handle tax compliance separately (Stripe Tax, Avalara, or TaxJar as third-party), Paddle bundles tax compliance into the per-transaction fee. For SaaS selling internationally with VAT and GST exposure, operational savings exceed the higher percentage. The catch is the higher percentage versus non-MoR alternatives; the per-transaction rate is roughly ten times the Stripe Billing Standard rate. For internationally-selling SaaS wanting to offload tax compliance, Paddle is the no-brainer entry.

Pros

  • Merchant of record handles VAT, GST, sales tax across 200+ jurisdictions
  • Risk plus fraud handled by platform
  • Single net payout simplifies accounting
  • Subscriptions plus one-time products
  • Volume-discounted rates above $1M ARR

Cons

  • Higher percentage than Stripe Billing or Chargebee for US-only SaaS
  • Less customization than developer-first Stripe
MoR 5% + 50cCustom volumeNo fixed monthlyNo free tier; per-transaction fee

Best for: Internationally-selling SaaS wanting to offload global tax compliance. 5% + 50c per transaction MoR; volume-discounted above $1M ARR.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
9
Setup complexity
9
Value
8
Support
8
#5

Lago

4.9/10$3,612/yr more

Best OSS self-hostable billing engine under Apache 2.0

OSS self-hostable billing engine under Apache 2.0 with cloud and self-host options.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Self-host (open source)FreeApache 2.0 license with unlimited self-host plus modern API.
Cloud Premium$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yrHosted by Lago with SLA, support, SAML SSO, custom volume pricing.
Cloud Enterprise$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yrCustom contract with dedicated infrastructure, SOC 2, on-prem option.

Lago is the OSS self-hostable billing engine for teams under data-residency constraints or hard cost ceilings. Founded in 2021 in Paris and backed by FirstMark, Lago built the only mainstream Apache 2.0 billing engine.

Three tiers serve three buyer profiles. Self-host ships free under Apache 2.0 with unlimited usage, modern API, and usage-based plus flat-rate support. Cloud Premium at the entry institutional rate ships hosted by Lago with SLA, support, SAML SSO, custom volume pricing. Cloud Enterprise ships custom contract with dedicated infrastructure, SOC 2, on-prem option.

The load-bearing wedge is the OSS escape hatch. Where Stripe Billing, Chargebee, Recurly, Paddle, Polar, and Orb lock you into the vendor's hosted runtime, Lago lets you self-host the entire stack on your own infrastructure under Apache 2.0; if the vendor changes terms or shuts down, you keep running. The cost ceiling is bounded; large SaaS hitting six-figure billing platform spend can self-host Lago for the cost of a small Postgres database. The catch is the operational overhead; self-hosting requires Node.js, Postgres, and DevOps capacity. For teams under data-residency or vendor-lock-in constraints, Lago Self-host is the proven path.

Pros

  • Apache 2.0 OSS license; self-host on your own infra
  • Cloud Premium ships SLA plus SAML SSO
  • Cloud Enterprise ships dedicated infra plus SOC 2
  • Usage-based plus flat-rate pricing models
  • On-prem option on Cloud Enterprise

Cons

  • Self-host requires Node.js, Postgres, plus DevOps capacity
  • Smaller ecosystem than Stripe or Chargebee
OSS self-host freeCloud Premium $500/moEnterprise $1.5k+/moOSS Apache 2.0 free; cancel-anytime monthly cloud

Best for: Teams under data-residency or vendor-lock-in constraints. Self-host free under Apache 2.0; Cloud Premium $500/mo annual; Cloud Enterprise $1500+/mo.

Tax + compliance
10
Billing engine
8
Setup complexity
7
Value
10
Support
7
#6

Recurly

3.4/10$2,400/yr more

Best institutional subscription management with fixed monthly tiers

Institutional subscription management at fixed monthly tiers from $199.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
Core$199.00/moSubscription billing, smart dunning, multi-currency, hosted payment pages.
Professional$399.00/moCore plus revenue recognition plus custom analytics plus tax integration.
Elite$1,000.00/moCustom enterprise pricing, SAML SSO, dedicated CSM, priority API rate limits.

Recurly is the institutional subscription management platform for mid-market and enterprise SaaS. Founded in 2009 in San Francisco and acquired by Accel-KKR in 2019, Recurly serves SaaS at the institutional level with deep revenue recognition, smart dunning, and SAML SSO support.

Three tiers serve three buyer profiles. Core at the entry monthly rate ships subscription billing, smart dunning, multi-currency, hosted payment pages. Professional at roughly twice the entry rate ships revenue recognition, custom analytics, and tax integration. Elite ships custom enterprise pricing with SAML SSO, dedicated success manager, and priority API rate limits.

The load-bearing wedge is the institutional polish for enterprise deals. Where Stripe Billing serves SaaS broadly and Chargebee serves SMB plus mid-market, Recurly's smart dunning, revenue recognition, and SAML SSO support fit enterprise procurement requirements; the platform feels purpose-built for finance teams rather than developers. The catch is the smaller mainstream brand in the modern SaaS ecosystem; Recurly is well-known among finance teams but less visible than Stripe in the developer-driven SaaS investor due diligence playbook. For mid-market SaaS at $5M+ ARR with finance-team requirements, Recurly Core is the proven institutional path.

Pros

  • Smart dunning plus multi-currency on Core
  • Revenue recognition plus tax integration on Professional
  • SAML SSO plus dedicated CSM on Elite
  • Hosted payment pages reduce PCI scope
  • Institutional polish for enterprise procurement

Cons

  • Smaller mainstream brand than Stripe in investor due diligence
  • No free tier; entry at the institutional fixed monthly rate
Core $199/moPro $399/moElite $1k+/moNo free tier; institutional contract

Best for: Mid-market SaaS at $5M+ ARR with finance-team requirements. Core $199/mo annual; Professional $399/mo with revenue recognition; Elite $1k+/mo.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
8
Setup complexity
8
Value
8
Support
9
#7

Orb

3.3/10$15,612/yr more

Best usage-based-first billing engine for AI plus infrastructure

Usage-based-first billing engine with real-time metering for AI and infrastructure.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Annual contract$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yrCustom enterprise contract for usage-based real-time metering plus hybrid pricing.

Orb is the usage-based-first billing engine for AI startups and infrastructure SaaS. Founded in 2021 in San Francisco and backed by Greylock, Orb positioned around the usage-based shape; the platform ships real-time metering, hybrid pricing models (flat fee plus usage plus seats), and event-driven billing that fits API-call, token-count, and storage-tier pricing.

One tier serves the audience. Annual contract ships custom enterprise pricing with usage-based billing engine, real-time metering, and hybrid pricing models.

The load-bearing wedge is real-time metering for usage-based pricing. Where Stripe Billing, Chargebee, and Recurly handle usage-based billing as a feature added to subscription primitives, Orb is purpose-built around metering as the foundation; the event ingestion API can handle millions of events per second, which fits AI inference billing where you charge per million tokens. The catch is the institutional pricing and lack of free tier; Orb is sold via annual contracts with custom pricing, which prices out solo founders and SMB SaaS. For AI startups and infrastructure SaaS with usage-based revenue at the institutional contract scale, Orb is the proven path.

Pros

  • Real-time metering at millions of events per second
  • Hybrid pricing (flat fee plus usage plus seats)
  • Event-driven billing fits AI token-count pricing
  • Revenue recognition plus quote-to-cash on enterprise
  • Custom enterprise contract with dedicated CSM

Cons

  • No free tier; institutional contract only
  • Smaller mainstream brand than Stripe or Chargebee
Annual contractReal-time meteringCustom pricingNo free tier; institutional annual contract

Best for: AI startups and infrastructure SaaS with usage-based revenue. Annual contract custom pricing; real-time metering plus hybrid pricing models.

Tax + compliance
9
Billing engine
10
Setup complexity
7
Value
7
Support
9

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

We weight price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, and fit 15. Stripe Billing, Paddle, Polar charge percentage-of-revenue (no fixed monthly); typical-tier heuristic shows $0, correct math but misleading prose. Editorial pinning places Stripe #1 over composite-leading Polar on brand recognition; documented in rationale and FAQ.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best mainstream billing platform on Stripe

Stripe Billing

Read the full review →

Best flat-rate subscription management

Chargebee

Read the full review →

Best merchant-of-record billing platform

Paddle

Read the full review →

Best OSS self-hostable billing platform

Lago

Read the full review →

Best usage-based billing platform

Orb

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (fifth) but worth flagging for cost-ceiling teams. Apache 2.0 self-host eliminates per-revenue compounding once SaaS billing platform spend exceeds six figures yearly.

Already in picks (sixth) but worth flagging for OSS maintainers on GitHub. Lowest MoR percentage in lineup at 4% plus 40c; GitHub-native flow ships in minutes for sponsorship products.

Already in picks (seventh) but worth flagging for AI startups. Real-time metering at millions of events per second fits API-call and token-count billing better than subscription-first platforms.

Already in picks (fourth) but worth flagging for internationally-selling SaaS. Merchant-of-record bundles VAT, GST, sales tax across 200+ jurisdictions into the per-transaction fee.

How to choose your Billing Platform

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best billing platforms' search covers seven distinct shapes, and most roundups conflate them with payment processors (Stripe Payments, Square) which only handle the card transaction. Mainstream percentage (Stripe Billing) targets SaaS already on Stripe Payments. Flat-rate subscription mgmt (Chargebee) targets SaaS expecting to scale past $1M ARR. Institutional subscription mgmt (Recurly) targets mid-market SaaS with finance-team requirements. Merchant-of-record (Paddle) targets internationally-selling SaaS wanting tax offload. OSS self-hostable (Lago) targets teams under data-residency constraints. OSS-creator MoR (Polar) targets GitHub-native maintainers. Usage-based-first (Orb) targets AI and infrastructure SaaS with usage-driven revenue. The honest framework: identify your scale, margin profile, tax exposure, and metering needs before subscribing.

Percentage vs flat-rate: pick by margin profile and ARR

The percentage-vs-flat-rate decision drives unit economics. Percentage models (Stripe Billing 0.5%-0.8%, Paddle 5%, Polar 4%) compound against revenue as you scale; a SaaS at $10M ARR pays roughly twenty times more in billing fees than at $500K ARR even though feature usage is identical. Flat-rate models (Chargebee, Recurly, Lago Cloud) charge a fixed monthly fee regardless of ARR. The honest framework: percentage wins for early-stage SaaS under $500K ARR where the absolute dollars are small; flat-rate wins past roughly $1M-$2M ARR depending on margin profile. High-margin SaaS (80%+ gross margin) can absorb percentage longer; low-margin e-commerce should switch earlier. Recompute the breakeven yearly; what was percentage-cheap at $500K ARR turns flat-rate-cheap at $5M ARR. For SaaS expecting growth, plan the migration path before you hit the breakeven.

Merchant-of-record vs self-tax: pick by international exposure

The merchant-of-record decision drives operational overhead. MoR platforms (Paddle, Polar) act as the legal merchant of record for your sales; the platform collects, files, and remits VAT, GST, and sales tax across 200+ jurisdictions while you receive a single net payout. Non-MoR platforms (Stripe Billing, Chargebee, Recurly, Lago, Orb) require you to handle tax compliance separately via Stripe Tax, Avalara, or TaxJar. The honest framework: MoR wins for internationally-selling SaaS with VAT and GST exposure; the operational savings exceed the higher percentage. Non-MoR wins for US-only SaaS without international tax exposure; the percentage premium is hard to justify. Track where your customers actually live before deciding; many founders assume international exposure is hypothetical and discover later that 30 percent of revenue came from EU customers triggering VAT obligations they did not realize.

Usage-based vs subscription: pick by metering depth needed

The usage-based-vs-subscription decision drives technical complexity. Subscription-first platforms (Stripe Billing, Chargebee, Recurly) treat usage as a feature added to subscription primitives; metering is fine for moderate event volumes but hits walls at API-call billing or AI token billing. Usage-based-first platforms (Orb) treat metering as foundational; event ingestion can handle millions of events per second. Lago is the OSS option that supports usage-based natively under Apache 2.0. The honest framework: subscription-first wins for SaaS with predictable seat-based or tier-based pricing; usage-based-first wins for AI inference, infrastructure-as-code, or any product where revenue scales with discrete events. AI startups in particular need usage-based-first (Orb or Lago) because token-count billing requires real-time metering at scale. Pick the metering shape that matches your product's revenue mechanics.

OSS self-host (Lago) vs SaaS billing platforms

Lago is the only OSS self-hostable pick in lineup, and it matters more than vendor-led roundups suggest. The honest framework: pick Lago OSS self-host when (1) data-residency requirements (HIPAA, GDPR, jurisdictional) mandate billing data stays on your infrastructure, (2) cost at scale exceeds SaaS economics ($100K+/yr in billing platform spend where self-host operational cost is lower), (3) vendor lock-in risk is unacceptable for the use case. Self-host pays infrastructure (Node.js plus Postgres, the same shape as a Next.js app) and absorbs operational tax of patching, backups, and uptime. For teams where SaaS is acceptable, Stripe Billing or Chargebee cover better at less operational overhead. For teams where data-residency or lock-in matters, Lago is the only option in lineup that delivers; the Apache 2.0 license guarantees you can keep running indefinitely even if Lago changes terms or shuts down.

When Stripe Billing wins versus Chargebee Launch

Stripe Billing versus Chargebee Launch is the load-bearing decision for early-stage SaaS. Both are effectively free at entry; Stripe Billing has no fixed monthly (just 0.5% on recurring) and Chargebee Launch is free under $250K ARR. The honest framework: Stripe Billing wins when (1) your SaaS already runs on Stripe Payments, (2) revenue is small enough that 0.5% on recurring is negligible (under $200K ARR), (3) you want the deepest developer-first API surface. Chargebee Launch wins when (1) you use non-Stripe payment gateways (Razorpay, Braintree), (2) you want a pure subscription-mgmt UI for finance-team operations, (3) you expect to scale past $250K ARR within 12-24 months and want flat-rate pricing locked in. For SaaS founders deciding fresh in 2026, Stripe Billing is the proven default for Stripe-native developer-first teams.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

Vendor pricing changes regularly. Rates here are what each vendor advertises in May 2026. Stripe Billing Standard 0.5% on recurring stable. Chargebee Rise $599/mo annual stable. Recurly Core $199/mo stable. Paddle MoR 5% + 50c per transaction stable. Lago Cloud Premium $500/mo annual stable. Polar 4% + 40c per transaction stable. Orb annual contract custom pricing varies. Verify current rates on the vendor site before committing.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership.

Why is Stripe Billing ranked first instead of composite-leading Polar?

Stripe Billing wins mainstream brand-recognition consensus across G2, Capterra, and SaaSWorthy AND uniquely-true on the mainstream-percentage-billing flag. Polar wins composite math at all-zero fixed fees plus free tier scoring, but covers a narrower OSS-creator-on-GitHub audience rather than mainstream SaaS. The picks-array order leads with the most-recognized billing platform for SaaS founders already on Stripe Payments. Polar is in picks (sixth) for OSS maintainers.

Should I pick percentage (Stripe, Paddle, Polar) or flat-rate (Chargebee, Recurly, Lago)?

Percentage wins for early-stage SaaS under $500K ARR where absolute dollars are small. Flat-rate wins past $1M-$2M ARR where percentage compounds against margin. Recompute breakeven yearly. High-margin SaaS (80%+ gross margin) can absorb percentage longer than low-margin e-commerce. Plan the migration path before hitting breakeven; switching billing platforms mid-flight costs engineering time and disrupts dunning workflows.

When does merchant-of-record (Paddle, Polar) beat self-tax (Stripe, Chargebee)?

When you sell internationally with VAT or GST exposure. MoR offloads tax compliance across 200+ jurisdictions into the per-transaction fee; self-tax requires Stripe Tax, Avalara, or TaxJar plus bookkeeping. MoR premium is roughly two to three times non-MoR rates, but operational savings exceed that for international SaaS. Track where customers actually live before deciding; many founders discover too late that 30 percent of revenue comes from EU customers triggering VAT obligations.

When does usage-based (Orb, Lago) beat subscription (Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly)?

When revenue scales with discrete events instead of seats or tiers. AI inference, infrastructure-as-code, and API-call billing need real-time metering at millions of events per second; subscription-first platforms hit walls. Orb is purpose-built for usage-based; Lago is the OSS option supporting usage natively. For seat-based SaaS, subscription-first platforms cover at lower operational complexity. Many SaaS use a hybrid (Stripe Billing for subscriptions plus Orb for usage overages).

When does OSS self-host (Lago) beat SaaS billing platforms?

When data-residency requirements mandate billing data stays on your infrastructure, when SaaS billing spend exceeds six figures yearly, or when vendor lock-in risk is unacceptable. Self-host pays infrastructure (Node.js plus Postgres) and absorbs operational tax of patching plus backups plus uptime. SaaS wins for teams without DevOps capacity. Lago is the only Apache 2.0 self-hostable pick in lineup; the license guarantees you can keep running indefinitely.

How much does a billing platform actually cost at scale with hidden fees?

Beyond the advertised rate, factor in: payment processor fees (Stripe Payments adds roughly 3% on top of Stripe Billing 0.5%), tax compliance services (Stripe Tax sold separately), fraud detection (sometimes bundled), payment gateway fees in non-Stripe ecosystems, and PCI compliance overhead. Realistic running cost for a $5M ARR SaaS on Stripe Billing plus Payments plus Tax: roughly 4 percent of revenue all-in, around $200K yearly in platform fees alone.

What happens if my billing platform raises prices or shuts down?

Six of the seven picks have no code-export, which means migrating plan definitions, customer subscriptions, and dunning rules manually. Lago is the exception; the Apache 2.0 OSS license lets you self-host indefinitely. Customer payment data lives in PCI-compliant token storage at the underlying processor; switching billing platforms means re-tokenizing. Plan migration paths before locking in.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes (rates stable through May 2026), new entrants (Maxio, Octane, Stigg), Stripe Billing percentage adjustments, MoR platform jurisdictional expansion. The lastReviewed date at the top reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Billing Platform you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides