Bruno
7.6Save $36/yrBest Git-native offline-first API client with .bru file format since 2023
Git-native offline-first API client with .bru Git-friendly file format since 2023.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source | Free | — | MIT-licensed core with .bru Git-friendly format. |
| Pro | $6.00/mo | $72.00/yr | Git integration, automation, unlimited workspaces. |
| Ultimate | $11.00/mo | $132.00/yr | SSO, SCIM, audit logs, complete Git UI. |
Bruno is the Git-native offline-first API client for developer teams whose evaluation centers on storing API collections in Git as plain text files plus offline-first workflow without mandatory cloud sync. Founded 2023 in India and MIT-licensed, Bruno built around the thesis that API collections are code that should live in Git alongside source code rather than locked inside a vendor cloud, with the .bru text file format designed for human-readable Git diffs.
Two tiers. Free covers open source MIT-licensed with the .bru Git-friendly file format plus no cloud sync required plus offline-first workflow. Bruno Cloud covers $9/user/mo optional cloud sync with the same Git-friendly format underneath.
The load-bearing wedge is the .bru-in-Git workflow. API collections stored as .bru files in the application repository get version-controlled alongside source code, reviewed in pull requests, and follow the same branch-merge workflow as application code; for teams that already manage configuration plus migrations plus tests in Git, Bruno fits the workflow naturally. The catch is the youth; Bruno launched 2023 and lacks the team-collaboration polish of Postman, the Kong API platform integration of Insomnia, or the deep test-runner ecosystem; for teams that need cloud-only collaboration, Bruno's offline-first thesis adds friction.
Pros
- MIT-licensed open source without vendor lock-in
- .bru file format for human-readable Git diffs
- Offline-first workflow without mandatory cloud sync
- Bruno Cloud $9/user as optional sync layer
- Strong fit for teams managing API collections in Git alongside code
Cons
- Younger than Postman/Insomnia; team-collaboration polish thinner
- Cloud-only collaboration teams find offline-first friction
Best for: Developer teams managing configuration in Git wanting API collections in .bru text files alongside source code rather than vendor cloud.
- Local-only plus cloud-sync posture
- 10
- Request response plus team sync latency
- 10
- Developer onboarding curve
- 9
- Value
- 10
- Support
- 8