SSubrupt

Postman Alternatives

API ClientsFree tier available
Visit Postman
PlanMonthlyAnnual
FreeFree—
Basic$19.00/mo$168.00/yr
ProfessionalMost popular$39.00/mo$348.00/yr
Enterprise$99.00/mo$1,044.00/yr

Verdict

Postman is the established API client and remains a fair pick for teams that already pay for Professional or Enterprise tiers. For solo developers and small teams whose actual usage is sending requests, the alternatives below cover the same job at a fraction of the price (often free). The cheapest credible Postman replacement is Bruno; the most polished is Insomnia Pro at $5; the best for VS Code-native developers is Thunder Client.

By Subrupt EditorialPublished Reviewed

Postman started as a Chrome extension for sending HTTP requests in 2012 and grew into the dominant API platform with 30M+ users. The free tier got tighter over the years (collaborator caps, mock and monitor limits) which pushed many teams to evaluate alternatives. Basic at $19 per user per month and Professional at $39 are honest pricing for teams that use the API design tooling, governance, and runs at high volume; for teams whose actual usage is sending requests, the price is overkill.

Where the alternatives below fit: Bruno is a Git-friendly local-first client built around a plain text file format (.bru) that works the way you would version-control any other source code; Insomnia is open source at the core with a polished pro tier at $5 per user; Hoppscotch is a fully open-source web app that you can self-host for free; Apidog combines API design plus testing plus docs in one tool at $9 per user; Thunder Client lives in VS Code with a $36-per-year perpetual license.

Decide by where the API client lives in your workflow. Git-friendly local-first: Bruno. Polished cloud sync at low cost: Insomnia Pro. Self-host on your own infrastructure: Hoppscotch. Combined design plus testing plus docs: Apidog. VS Code-native: Thunder Client.

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

If you want Git-friendly version control with no cloud lock-inBrunoBruno stores collections as plain text .bru files that diff cleanly in any Git repo.If you want polished cloud sync at a quarter of Postman's priceInsomniaInsomnia Pro at $5/user/mo covers cloud sync, encrypted collections, and Git sync.If you want a fully open-source web app you can self-hostHoppscotchHoppscotch is MIT-licensed and runs as a web app, desktop app, or self-host on your infrastructure.If you want API design, testing, mock, and docs in one toolApidogApidog combines all four workflows for $9/user/mo on Basic, well below Postman Pro at $39.If you live in VS Code and want the API client thereThunder ClientThunder Client is a VS Code extension with cloud sync available for $36/year perpetual.

At a glance: Postman alternatives

Quick comparison across pricing floor, best fit, and switching effort. Tap a row to jump to the full pick.

Our picks for Postman alternatives

#1

Bruno

Free tierLow switching effort

Best for Git-friendly local-first workflows

Try Bruno

Bruno stores collections as plain text .bru files that live in your Git repo alongside source code. The diff on a request change is human-readable, branching collections is the same as branching code, and there is no cloud sync to misconfigure. For teams who treat their API surface as something that should be version-controlled with the code that calls it, Bruno handles that pattern and Postman's cloud-only model is a step backwards.

Strengths

  • +Open source MIT
  • +Plain text .bru format diffs cleanly in Git
  • +No cloud lock-in
  • +Works fully offline

Trade-offs

  • −Smaller community than Postman
  • −Bruno Cloud sync still maturing
  • −Newer project (2023)
Free
Open source MIT
Bruno Cloud
$9/user/mo (sync optional)
Format
Plain text .bru
Founded
2023
Migration steps
  1. Install Bruno from usebruno.com.
  2. Export your Postman collections as JSON.
  3. Import JSON into Bruno; the converter creates corresponding .bru files.
  4. Commit the .bru files to your repo and adopt the same review process as for code.

Not for: Bruno is the wrong fit if you depend on Postman Monitors, Mock Servers, or governance APIs; those require Postman Cloud or Apidog.

Paid plans from $9.00/mo

#2

Insomnia

Free tierLow switching effort

Best for polished cloud sync at low price

Try Insomnia

Insomnia ships an open-source core with a Pro tier at $5 per user per month for cloud sync, encrypted shared collections, and Git sync. The product is polished, the team workflow is shaped like Postman's was before the ownership change, and the price is roughly a quarter of Postman Basic. For teams who want the Postman experience without Postman pricing, Insomnia Pro is the leading fit.

Strengths

  • +$5/user Pro vs Postman Basic $19
  • +Polished UX comparable to Postman
  • +REST plus GraphQL plus gRPC support
  • +Open source core

Trade-offs

  • −Free tier is local-only (no cloud sync)
  • −Acquired by Kong; long-term direction depends on Kong's strategy
  • −Smaller integration ecosystem than Postman
Free
Local-only collections
Pro
$5/user/mo
Enterprise
$25/user/mo
Owned by
Kong (since 2022)
Migration steps
  1. Install Insomnia from insomnia.rest.
  2. Import Postman collections via the JSON export/import.
  3. Sign up for Insomnia Pro if you need cloud sync.
  4. Migrate environments and switch authentication setups; the surface is similar enough that most workflows port directly.

Not for: Pass on Insomnia if you specifically want to avoid vendor concentration; Bruno or Hoppscotch are independently developed.

Paid plans from $5.00/mo

#3

Hoppscotch

Free tierMedium switching effort

Best for fully open-source self-host

Try Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is MIT-licensed and runs as a web app, desktop app, or self-host on your own infrastructure. The protocol coverage (REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, SSE, MQTT, Realtime) is broader than most alternatives. For organizations that want their API client running on their own servers (data sovereignty, air-gapped environments, regulated industries), Hoppscotch earns its place and Postman's cloud-only model does not work.

Strengths

  • +Open source MIT
  • +Self-host fully free
  • +REST + GraphQL + WebSocket + SSE + MQTT
  • +Browser-based with no install required

Trade-offs

  • −UX less polished than Insomnia or Postman
  • −Self-host requires Docker plus Postgres
  • −Smaller plugin ecosystem
Free cloud or self-host
Yes
Cloud Pro
$19/user/mo
Enterprise
Custom (self-host with support)
Protocols
REST, GraphQL, WS, SSE, MQTT
Migration steps
  1. Try Hoppscotch web app at hoppscotch.io with no account.
  2. Import Postman collections via the JSON converter.
  3. If self-hosting, deploy via Docker Compose with Postgres backend.
  4. Configure SAML SSO if needed for the team; cut over once parity is verified.

Not for: Hoppscotch comes up short if you want a polished native desktop UX; Insomnia or Postman are shaped better there.

Paid plans from $19.00/mo

#4

Apidog

Free tierMedium switching effort

Best for combined API design plus testing plus docs

Try Apidog

Apidog combines what Postman, Stoplight, and ReadMe do separately: API design, testing, mock servers, and auto-generated docs in one tool. Free covers up to 4 team members; Basic at $9 per user per month is below Postman Basic at $19 with broader functionality. For teams whose API workflow spans design through documentation, Apidog is shaped right and using three separate tools is the friction Apidog targets.

Strengths

  • +API design, testing, mock, and docs unified
  • +Free for up to 4 team members
  • +$9/user Basic well below Postman Basic
  • +Auto-generated docs from spec

Trade-offs

  • −Newer brand outside Asia
  • −UI dense with features (steeper learning curve)
  • −Some translations from Mandarin can feel rough
Free
Up to 4 team members
Basic
$9/user/mo
Professional
$21/user/mo
Functions
Design + test + mock + docs
Migration steps
  1. Sign up at apidog.com (free for up to 4 team members).
  2. Import Postman collections or OpenAPI spec.
  3. Configure mock servers and CI integration if needed.
  4. Replace separate design and testing tools; cancel Postman once Apidog covers your API workflow.

Not for: Apidog is not the right call for teams using only the API client surface; Bruno or Insomnia are simpler and cheaper.

Paid plans from $9.00/mo

#5

Thunder Client

Free tierLow switching effort

Best for VS Code-native API client

Try Thunder Client

Thunder Client lives in VS Code as an extension with a free local tier and a Pro license at $36 per year (perpetual once paid for that year) covering cloud sync, team workspaces, and Git sync. For developers whose code editor is the center of their workflow, having the API client in the same window is a real productivity win. The price is a fraction of Postman, Insomnia, or Apidog.

Strengths

  • +VS Code-native (no context switch)
  • +$36/year perpetual license is the cheapest paid option
  • +Cloud sync available
  • +Lightweight install

Trade-offs

  • −Limited to VS Code (no JetBrains, no standalone app)
  • −Smaller feature set than Postman or Insomnia
  • −Sole maintainer means slower feature pace
Free
VS Code extension, local
Pro
$36/year
Cloud sync
Pro tier
Founded
2020
Migration steps
  1. Install Thunder Client from the VS Code extension marketplace.
  2. Import Postman collections via JSON.
  3. If team-based, buy Pro license and configure cloud sync.
  4. Cancel Postman once Thunder Client covers your daily flow.

Not for: Pass on Thunder Client if you are not a VS Code user; Insomnia or Bruno are shaped better as standalone apps.

When to stay with Postman

Stay with Postman if your team relies on collection runs, monitors, or governance features that require Professional or Enterprise tiers. The list below favors local-first workflows, Git-friendly file formats, and lower-cost alternatives that match Postman's core feature set.

5 Alternatives to Postman

InsomniaFree tier

Insomnia starts at $5.00/mo vs Postman Professional at $39.00/mo

From $5.00/mo

Save $34.00/mo ($408.00/yr)

Switch to Insomnia
BrunoFree tier

Bruno starts at $9.00/mo vs Postman Professional at $39.00/mo

From $9.00/mo

Save $30.00/mo ($360.00/yr)

Switch to Bruno
HoppscotchFree tier

Hoppscotch starts at $19.00/mo vs Postman Professional at $39.00/mo

From $19.00/mo

Save $20.00/mo ($240.00/yr)

Switch to Hoppscotch
ApidogFree tier

Apidog starts at $9.00/mo vs Postman Professional at $39.00/mo

From $9.00/mo

Save $30.00/mo ($360.00/yr)

Switch to Apidog
Thunder ClientFree tier

From $0/mo (free)

Switch to Thunder Client

Price Comparison

Compared against Postman Professional ($39.00/mo)

Continue your research

Bruno alternativesInsomnia alternativesHoppscotch alternativesApidog alternatives

How we picked

API client alternatives are scored on workflow fit (Git-native vs cloud sync, standalone vs editor-embedded) and feature scope (client-only vs design-plus-test-plus-docs). Each pick leads on one axis: file format, price, openness, scope, or editor integration.

Pricing is taken from each vendor's site on the review date. Per-user pricing on team tiers compounds; we noted real per-user costs on each pick where they differ from the headline.

Update history1 update
  • Initial published version with 5 picks.

Frequently asked questions about Postman alternatives

Is Postman Free still usable in 2026?

For solo developers sending occasional requests, yes. The 3-collaborator cap and limited collection runs make it impractical for teams. Most teams that hit the limits land on Insomnia Pro or Bruno for the cost-versus-feature win.

Can I migrate Postman collections to other tools?

Yes. Postman exports collections as JSON. Bruno, Insomnia, Hoppscotch, Apidog, and Thunder Client all import the JSON format with high fidelity. Pre-request scripts and tests written in Postman's script API may need minor adjustments.

What is the difference between Insomnia and Bruno?

Insomnia stores collections in a cloud-synced encrypted format (Pro tier required for sync). Bruno stores them as plain text .bru files in your Git repo. Insomnia is more polished; Bruno is more portable. Pick based on whether you want cloud sync (Insomnia) or Git-friendly version control (Bruno).

Is Hoppscotch's self-host actually viable for teams?

Yes. Hoppscotch's self-host runs on Docker Compose with a Postgres database. Teams running it report stable operation. The trade-off vs cloud is operational responsibility: backups, TLS, and updates are on you. Hoppscotch Cloud Pro at $19 per user covers teams that prefer hosted.

Does Apidog really replace Stoplight or ReadMe?

For documentation generation from OpenAPI specs, yes. For design-by-portal collaboration with non-engineering stakeholders, Stoplight remains shaped better. Apidog is best for engineering-led API workflows; Stoplight is best when product or technical writing teams own the API design surface.

SE

About the author: Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish comparisons where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Get notified of price drops for Postman

We'll email you when Postman or its alternatives lower their prices.

Track Postman and find more savings

Add Postman to your dashboard to monitor spending and discover even more alternatives.

Go to Dashboard