Greenhouse Alternatives

Applicant Tracking Systems
PlanMonthlyAnnual
Essential$600.00/mo$7,200.00/yr
AdvancedMost popular$1,700.00/mo$20,000.00/yr
Expert$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yr

Verdict

Greenhouse Essential lands at $6K-$9K annually for a 25-employee team and scales to $40K-$80K at 500 employees on Expert. The structured interviewing plus 500+ integrations make it the default for series B+ companies that already moved off Lever or Workable. For mid-market teams under 100 employees, the alternatives win on price: Lever bundles ATS plus CRM at half the cost, Workable starts at $169 monthly with no per-employee scaling, Ashby is analytics-native at $3K-$5K yearly for 25 employees, Recruitee fits EU-headquartered teams at €224 monthly, and Breezy HR offers a free tier for 1-position pipelines.

By Subrupt EditorialPublished Reviewed

$6K-$9K yearly for 25 employees on Greenhouse Essential. That number sets the bar against which every alternative is measured. The structured interviewing posture and 500+ integration ecosystem justify the premium for series B+ companies, but mid-market teams routinely find that 60-80% of Greenhouse's feature surface is unused while the per-seat cost climbs at hire. The pricing model rewards companies hiring at scale; it punishes teams hiring 10-30 roles per year.

The category split: Greenhouse and Lever target series B+ scale (50+ requisitions per year, dedicated TA leader, structured DEI program). Workable and Ashby target series A and growth-stage (10-50 requisitions, hiring manager driven). Recruitee fits EU-headquartered teams with GDPR-aligned residency. Breezy HR fits founder-led hiring or one-position pipelines. The crossover where Greenhouse's polished depth pays back is typically: 50+ annual hires plus dedicated TA leadership plus enterprise integration list.

Pick by what you actually need. Bundled ATS plus sourcing CRM at half the cost: Lever. Per-month flat pricing without per-employee scaling: Workable. Analytics-native with bundled ATS plus CRM plus scheduling: Ashby. EU-headquartered with GDPR residency: Recruitee. Free tier for solo or founder-led hiring: Breezy HR.

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

At a glance: Greenhouse alternatives

Quick comparison across pricing floor, best fit, and switching effort. Tap a row to jump to the full pick.

Our picks for Greenhouse alternatives

#1

Lever

Medium switching effort

Best for bundled ATS plus sourcing CRM

Try Lever

LeverTRM at $3.5K-$5.5K yearly for 25 employees bundles applicant tracking with a sourcing CRM and nurture campaigns. Where Greenhouse separates ATS from sourcing tools (often requiring add-ons or a Gem contract for sourcing CRM), Lever ships the bundle in the base license. For teams whose recruiters spend equal time on inbound applicants and outbound sourcing campaigns, the bundled posture removes a second-tool tax. The trade-off vs Greenhouse: smaller third-party integration list, less polished structured interviewing, weaker DEI reporting at scale.

Strengths

  • +Bundled ATS plus sourcing CRM at half Greenhouse cost
  • +Nurture campaigns plus sequences built in
  • +$10K-$18K yearly for 100 employees beats Greenhouse pricing
  • +Strong fit for outbound sourcing teams

Trade-offs

  • Smaller third-party integration ecosystem
  • Less polished structured interviewing flow
  • Weaker DEI reporting at 500+ employee scale
LeverTRM
Custom (~$3.5K-$5.5K/yr for 25 emp)
Pro
Custom (~$10K-$18K/yr for 100 emp)
Enterprise
Custom (~$35K-$60K/yr for 500 emp)
Strength
Bundled CRM + sequences
Migration steps
  1. Schedule call with Lever (4-6 weeks discovery).
  2. Export Greenhouse candidate database via API.
  3. Configure Lever pipelines plus nurture campaigns.
  4. Run parallel for 60 days with one open role on Lever.
  5. Cancel Greenhouse once Lever covers your sourcing plus ATS.

Not for: Pass on Lever if your DEI reporting depends on Greenhouse's manager dashboards or your structured interview kits are deeply tuned across 100+ requisitions.

Paid plans from $350.00/mo

#2

Workable

Free tierMedium switching effort

Best for flat per-month pricing under 50 employees

Try Workable

Workable Starter at $169 monthly for up to 50 employees and Standard at $360 monthly for up to 50 employees skip the per-employee scaling that Greenhouse and Lever apply. For a 30-person company hiring 15 roles annually, Workable Standard runs $4,320 yearly. The same workload on Greenhouse Essential lands closer to $7,200. Workable's value compounds at steady hiring volumes where the per-employee scaling on Greenhouse becomes a tax.

Strengths

  • +$169-$360/mo flat pricing skips per-employee scaling
  • +AI sourcing plus job board posting included on Starter
  • +$599/mo Premier covers SSO plus onboarding
  • +Simple to deploy without dedicated TA leader

Trade-offs

  • Less polished workflow vs Greenhouse at 100+ requisitions
  • Smaller integration list than Greenhouse
  • Premier still requires per-employee scaling above 50 employees
Starter
$169/mo, 50 employees
Standard
$360/mo, 50 employees
Premier
$599/mo + per-emp scaling
Strength
Flat pricing under 50 employees
Migration steps
  1. Sign up at workable.com (15-day free trial).
  2. Configure pipelines plus scorecards plus job postings.
  3. Migrate Greenhouse open roles to Workable.
  4. Run parallel for 30-45 days.
  5. Cancel Greenhouse subscription once Workable covers active hiring.

Not for: Workable falls short for 100+ requisitions yearly where Greenhouse's structured interviewing and DEI reporting earn back the price difference.

Paid plans from $169.00/mo

#3

Ashby

High switching effort

Best for analytics-native with bundled scheduling

Try Ashby

Ashby Plus at $10K-$16K yearly for 100 employees bundles ATS plus CRM plus interview scheduling plus sourcing analytics in one platform. Where a Greenhouse stack at the same scale typically requires Greenhouse plus Gem (sourcing) plus GoodTime (scheduling) plus a separate analytics layer, Ashby ships the full set. For TA teams running everything off pipeline analytics, the bundled approach removes integration glue and surfaces scheduling data inline with hiring data. The trade-off vs Greenhouse: smaller community plus integration list, newer platform with less battle-tested at 1K+ employee scale.

Strengths

  • +Bundled ATS + CRM + scheduling + analytics in one platform
  • +Analytics-native posture beats Greenhouse reports
  • +$10K-$16K/yr at 100 emp vs Greenhouse $15K-$25K Advanced
  • +Strong fit for TA teams running off pipeline metrics

Trade-offs

  • Smaller community than Greenhouse
  • Newer platform, less proven at 1K+ employee scale
  • Smaller integration list than Greenhouse 500+
Foundations
Custom (~$3K-$5K/yr for 25 emp)
Plus
Custom (~$10K-$16K/yr for 100 emp)
Enterprise
Custom (~$30K-$55K/yr for 500 emp)
Strength
Bundled CRM + scheduling + analytics
Migration steps
  1. Schedule call with Ashby (4-6 weeks discovery).
  2. Export Greenhouse plus Gem plus GoodTime data.
  3. Configure Ashby pipelines plus scheduling templates.
  4. Run parallel for 60-90 days with subset of roles.
  5. Cancel Greenhouse plus Gem plus GoodTime once Ashby covers them.

Not for: Avoid Ashby if your hiring stack is deeply tied to Greenhouse's 500+ integrations or you need 5+ years of platform stability for Fortune 500 vendor risk approval.

Paid plans from $350.00/mo

#4

Recruitee

Medium switching effort

Best for EU-headquartered teams

Try Recruitee

Recruitee Scale at €359 monthly is Amsterdam-headquartered with EU data residency and integrates 1325 job boards (Indeed plus LinkedIn plus Glassdoor plus regional EU boards). For European teams under GDPR, the data residency posture removes a compliance review that Greenhouse's US-first posture creates. The 1325-job-board reach beats Greenhouse's connector list for European recruiting where local boards (StepStone, Reed, Welcome to the Jungle) matter. The trade-off vs Greenhouse: smaller US presence, less polished US enterprise integrations (Workday, ADP).

Strengths

  • +Amsterdam-headquartered with EU data residency
  • +1325 job board posting beats Greenhouse for European boards
  • +€359/mo Scale fits 50-200 employee teams
  • +Strong fit for EU SaaS plus regulated industries

Trade-offs

  • Less polished US enterprise integrations
  • Smaller US customer base than Greenhouse
  • DEI reporting weaker than Greenhouse at scale
Launch
€224/mo, up to 5 jobs
Scale
€359/mo, unlimited jobs
Lead
Custom (~€800+/mo)
Strength
EU residency + 1325 boards
Migration steps
  1. Sign up at recruitee.com (18-day free trial).
  2. Configure career site plus pipelines plus EU job board postings.
  3. Migrate active Greenhouse roles to Recruitee.
  4. Run parallel for 45-60 days.
  5. Cancel Greenhouse subscription when Recruitee covers EU hiring stack.

Not for: Recruitee is the wrong call for US-first companies without EU residency requirements; staying with Greenhouse keeps the US enterprise integration depth.

Paid plans from $245.00/mo

#5

Breezy HR

Free tierLow switching effort

Best for free-tier solo or founder-led hiring

Try Breezy HR

Breezy HR Bootstrap is free forever for 1 active position and 1 user. Startup at $157 monthly unlocks unlimited positions plus 50+ job boards. Growth at $273 monthly adds video interviews and scheduling. Business at $439 monthly covers SSO and advanced reporting. For founder-led hiring or product teams running 1-3 open roles, Breezy's free tier eliminates the entire ATS subscription line item. The trade-off vs Greenhouse: limited DEI reporting, smaller integration list, no CRM plus sourcing tools at the entry tier.

Strengths

  • +Free forever for 1 active position
  • +$157/mo Startup beats Workable plus Greenhouse entry
  • +Video interviews on Growth tier
  • +Strong fit for founder-led plus solo hiring

Trade-offs

  • Limited DEI reporting
  • Smaller integration list than Greenhouse plus Workable
  • No bundled sourcing CRM at entry tiers
Bootstrap
Free, 1 active position
Startup
$157/mo, unlimited positions
Growth
$273/mo + video interviews
Business
$439/mo + SSO
Migration steps
  1. Sign up at breezy.hr (free Bootstrap tier).
  2. Configure career site plus pipeline plus 1-3 open roles.
  3. Migrate Greenhouse candidate emails plus notes manually for active roles.
  4. Cancel Greenhouse subscription once Breezy covers active hiring.

Not for: Breezy is the wrong fit for 50+ requisitions yearly or DEI-program teams; staying with Greenhouse is correct for those scales.

Paid plans from $157.00/mo

When to stay with Greenhouse

Stay with Greenhouse if your hiring team has built structured interview kits across 100+ requisitions, your DEI dashboards inform compensation cycles, or your dedicated CSM relationship covers ongoing scorecard tuning. The picks below address Lever's TRM bundle, Workable's per-employee floor, Ashby's analytics-native platform, EU-friendly Recruitee, and free-tier-friendly Breezy HR.

5 Alternatives to Greenhouse

Lever starts at $350.00/mo vs Greenhouse Advanced at $1,700.00/mo

From $350.00/mo

Save $1,350.00/mo ($16,200.00/yr)

Switch to Lever
WorkableFree tier

Workable starts at $169.00/mo vs Greenhouse Advanced at $1,700.00/mo

From $169.00/mo

Save $1,531.00/mo ($18,372.00/yr)

Switch to Workable

Ashby starts at $350.00/mo vs Greenhouse Advanced at $1,700.00/mo

From $350.00/mo

Save $1,350.00/mo ($16,200.00/yr)

Switch to Ashby

Recruitee starts at $245.00/mo vs Greenhouse Advanced at $1,700.00/mo

From $245.00/mo

Save $1,455.00/mo ($17,460.00/yr)

Switch to Recruitee
Breezy HRFree tier

Breezy HR starts at $157.00/mo vs Greenhouse Advanced at $1,700.00/mo

From $157.00/mo

Save $1,543.00/mo ($18,516.00/yr)

Switch to Breezy HR

Price Comparison

Compared against Greenhouse Advanced ($1,700.00/mo)

Continue your research

How we picked

ATS alternatives split along three vectors: hiring volume (under 10 roles vs 10-50 vs 50+ yearly), team shape (founder-led vs hiring manager driven vs dedicated TA leader), and feature scope (ATS-only vs ATS plus CRM vs ATS plus CRM plus scheduling plus analytics). Picks below address each combination.

Pricing pulled from each vendor's site or sales conversations on the review date. We score on cost-at-volume for representative hiring teams (15 hires plus 25 employees, 50 hires plus 100 employees, 200 hires plus 500 employees), feature breadth at the entry tier, and operational lift to migrate. We weight against tools whose advertised pricing excludes essential features (SSO, custom roles, sourcing CRM) that quickly push users to Enterprise tier.

Update history1 update
  • Initial published version with 5 picks.

Frequently asked questions about Greenhouse alternatives

When does Greenhouse's pricing become problematic?

Math: a 100-employee company on Greenhouse Advanced pays $15K-$25K yearly. The same team on Lever Pro pays $10K-$14K yearly. Workable Standard at $360 monthly hits roughly $4,320. Ashby Plus lands at $10K-$16K. The price spread is 1.5-3x at growth-stage scale. Greenhouse pays back when DEI reporting plus 500+ integrations plus dedicated CSM matter more than the $5K-$15K price difference; for teams hiring under 50 roles per year without dedicated TA leadership, the alternatives are typically better cost-fit.

How do I evaluate ATS migration complexity?

Three factors: (1) candidate database size (under 10K candidates is straightforward, 10K-100K requires careful API extraction, 100K+ needs vendor migration services); (2) integration depth (Greenhouse plus 20+ integrations means each integration needs reconfiguration in the new platform); (3) interview kit complexity (heavily customized scorecards plus structured interviewing translate poorly between platforms). Plan 6-12 weeks for a clean Greenhouse-to-Lever migration with under 10K candidates plus standard integrations.

What about Lever vs Greenhouse for series B+ companies?

Lever and Greenhouse compete head-to-head at series B+ scale. Greenhouse wins on structured interviewing depth, DEI reporting maturity, and 500+ integration list. Lever wins on bundled sourcing CRM plus nurture sequences plus a more cohesive single-platform feel. Companies that source heavily outbound (recruiting team driven) often prefer Lever; companies that prioritize structured interview rigor (TA-leader driven) often prefer Greenhouse. The pricing is roughly comparable at series B+; the choice comes down to platform shape.

Are there free alternatives to Greenhouse worth considering?

Three credible free options: (1) Breezy HR Bootstrap for 1 active position, fits founder-led hiring; (2) Workable's 15-day free trial covers a single hiring cycle; (3) Greenhouse, Lever, and Ashby do not offer free tiers, but Workable Starter at $169 monthly is the cheapest credible paid floor. For pre-seed plus seed companies hiring 1-5 roles per year, Breezy or Workable Starter cover the use case at $0-$169 monthly versus Greenhouse's $7K+ yearly entry.

How does Ashby compare to Greenhouse for analytics-driven TA teams?

Ashby ships analytics natively (pipeline conversion, source attribution, recruiter productivity) where Greenhouse requires the Pro tier or third-party tools. For TA teams that run daily standups off pipeline metrics, Ashby's analytics surface beats Greenhouse's reports. The trade is platform maturity: Greenhouse has 12+ years of feature accumulation; Ashby is newer with smaller community and fewer 1K+ employee customers. Companies prioritizing analytics depth at 100-500 employee scale increasingly pick Ashby; Fortune 500 enterprise procurement still defaults to Greenhouse.

SE

About the author: Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish comparisons where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Get notified of price drops for Greenhouse

We'll email you when Greenhouse or its alternatives lower their prices.

Track Greenhouse and find more savings

Add Greenhouse to your dashboard to monitor spending and discover even more alternatives.

Go to Dashboard