Skip to content

Best Video Conferencing Services of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

The Microsoft 365 bundled meetings pick with Teams, 1TB OneDrive, and web Office at $6/user.

BEST OVERALL7.8/10Save $48/yr

Microsoft Teams

The Microsoft 365 bundled meetings pick with Teams, 1TB OneDrive, and web Office at $6/user.

30-day trial

How it stacks up

  • Free 60-min meetings

    vs $13.33 Zoom Pro for similar duration

  • Essentials $4/mo, Business Basic $6/mo

    vs ~$10 category-average typical-tier

  • Microsoft 365 included

    vs no Office bundle on Zoom or Whereby

#2
Whereby6.0/10

From $10.99/mo

View
#3
Zoom5.9/10

From $13.33/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingScore
1Microsoft TeamsBest for Microsoft 365 households$4.00/mo7.8/10
2WherebyBest browser-first with no installer required$10.99/mo6.0/10
3ZoomBest mainstream video conferencing$13.33/mo5.9/10
4Google MeetBest for Google Workspace households$7.20/mo5.5/10
5AroundBest for casual modern team meetings$10.99/mo5.3/10
6LoomBest for async video messaging$15.00/mo5.3/10
7TandemBest for always-on virtual office presence$10.00/mo5.3/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Top spec
#1Microsoft Teams7.8/10$6.00/moSave $48/yrFree 60-min meetings
#2Whereby6.0/10$10.99/mo$11.88/yr moreFree 1 room, 45-min
#3Zoom5.9/10$13.33/mo$159.96/yr$39.96/yr moreFree 40-min meetings
#4Google Meet5.5/10$14.40/mo$52.80/yr moreFree 60-min meetings
#5Around5.3/10$10.99/mo$11.88/yr moreFree 45-min, 12 participants
#6Loom5.3/10$15.00/mo$60/yr moreFree 25 videos, 5-min
#7Tandem5.3/10$10.00/moFree virtual office
#1

Microsoft Teams

7.8/10Save $48/yr

Best for Microsoft 365 households

The Microsoft 365 bundled meetings pick with Teams, 1TB OneDrive, and web Office at $6/user.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 100 participants, 60-minute meetings, and 5GB storage
Essentials$4.00/mo300 participants and 30-hour meetings with 10GB storage at $4/user/mo (Teams-only, no Office bundle)
Business Basic$6.00/mo300 participants and 30-hour meetings with 1TB OneDrive and web Office apps at $6/user/mo

Microsoft Teams is the video conferencing tool that is already paid for if your company runs on Microsoft 365. The wedge is integration depth: meetings drop into Outlook calendar invites natively, files attach from OneDrive without re-upload, and chat threads persist across the company.

Free tier covers 100 participants, 60-minute meetings, and 5GB storage. Standalone Teams Essentials at $4/mo covers just the meeting product without the Office bundle. Business Basic at $6/user/mo includes Teams (300 participants, 30-hour meetings) plus 1TB OneDrive plus web versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook. E2E encryption is available on demand for one-on-one and group calls.

The catch: standalone Teams without Microsoft 365 is a worse Zoom, and the Linux desktop client trails the Windows and Mac apps in features. Default to Teams when Microsoft 365 is already on the bill; pay Zoom when cross-platform reliability matters more than the bundle.

Pros

  • Business Basic at $6 bundles Teams + 1TB OneDrive + web Office
  • Free tier covers 60-minute meetings with 100 participants
  • Deep Outlook calendar and OneDrive integration
  • Mature transcription and live captions on paid tiers
  • E2E encryption for one-on-one and group calls on demand

Cons

  • Standalone Teams without Microsoft 365 is a worse Zoom
  • Linux desktop client trails the Windows and Mac apps in features
Free 60-min meetingsEssentials $4/mo, Business Basic $6/moMicrosoft 365 included30-day trial

Best for: Households or teams already paying for Microsoft 365 who want video conferencing inside the Office suite they already use.

Privacy
7
Video quality
8
UI
8
Value
10
Support
9
#2

Whereby

6.0/10$11.88/yr more

Best browser-first with no installer required

The browser-first Norway-based meetings pick where participants click a link and join from any browser.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 1 meeting room with 100 participants and 45-minute meetings
Pro$10.99/mo3 meeting rooms with recording and custom branding at $10.99/mo
Business$14.99/moUnlimited rooms with SSO and priority support at $14.99/mo

Whereby is the video conferencing tool when you cannot ask participants to install anything. The product runs entirely in the browser using WebRTC, with no app store install on any platform. Whereby is incorporated in Norway, which sits outside the 14 Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance, a meaningful editorial wedge for privacy-bound teams.

Free tier covers 1 room, 100 participants, and 45-minute meetings, enough for most external client calls. Pro at $10.99/mo covers 3 meeting rooms, recording, and custom branding. Business at $14.99/mo unlocks unlimited rooms and SSO. The Embedded API lets you add video to your own product, which is a real wedge for SaaS shops.

The catch: no native transcripts (manual or third-party only), TLS in transit rather than native end-to-end encryption, and a smaller third-party-integration ecosystem than Zoom or Teams. Default to Whereby for agencies, telehealth, and small teams running client-facing meetings; pay Zoom when transcripts or breakout-room depth matter.

Pros

  • Norway HQ sits outside the 14 Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance
  • Runs entirely in the browser; no installer for any platform
  • Free tier with 100 participants and 45-minute meetings
  • Embedded API for adding video to your own product
  • Recording on Pro tier at $8.99 a month

Cons

  • No native transcripts (manual or third-party only)
  • TLS in transit; no native end-to-end encryption
Free 1 room, 45-minPro $8.99/mo, Business $11.99/moNorway jurisdiction14-day trial

Best for: Agencies, telehealth providers, and teams who run client-facing calls and cannot ask participants to install software.

Privacy
9
Video quality
8
UI
10
Value
8
Support
7
#3

Zoom

5.9/10$39.96/yr more

Best mainstream video conferencing

The mainstream meeting default every other tool benchmarks against, on every OS without configuration.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
BasicFreeFree 40-minute meetings with up to 100 participants
Pro$13.33/mo30-hour meetings with up to 100 participants and cloud storage at $13.33/mo on annual
Business$21.99/mo300 participants with admin portal and managed domains at $21.99/mo

Zoom is the video conferencing tool everyone else benchmarks against. The wedge against the rest of the field is reliability: it works on every OS (Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android, ChromeOS), the desktop app handles bandwidth dropouts gracefully, and the meeting product has the deepest feature surface (polls, Q&A, captions, hand raise, co-host) that mature business workflows depend on.

Free tier covers 40-minute meetings with 100 participants, which is enough for most one-off calls before the participant count or duration pushes you to paid. Pro at $13.33/mo on annual covers 30-hour meetings with up to 100 participants, cloud recording, transcripts, and breakout rooms. Business at $21.99/mo extends to 300 participants with the admin portal and managed domains. E2E encryption is available on demand for sensitive meetings.

The catch: $13.33 typical is the highest paid price in our seven picks, and there is no native workspace integration (Microsoft 365 households and Google Workspace households both have cheaper options inside their existing suite). Default to Zoom when cross-platform reliability matters and you do not live in a single workspace ecosystem; pay Teams or Meet when bundle math wins.

Pros

  • Works on every OS without configuration; Linux client included
  • 30-hour meetings on Pro, 40-minute meetings on Free
  • Deepest feature surface: polls, Q&A, captions, breakout rooms
  • Mature E2E encryption available on demand for sensitive meetings
  • Free tier is the most-recognized free meeting product in the category

Cons

  • $13.33 typical is the highest paid price in our seven picks
  • No native workspace integration with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace
Free 40-min meetingsPro $13.33/mo, Business $21.99/moE2E encryption

Best for: Mainstream business users who want a video conferencing tool that works on every platform without ecosystem dependency.

Privacy
8
Video quality
9
UI
9
Value
7
Support
9
#4

Google Meet

5.5/10$52.80/yr more

Best for Google Workspace households

The Google Workspace bundled meetings pick with browser-first joining and Calendar plus Gmail integration.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 60-minute meetings with up to 100 participants
Business Starter$7.20/mo24-hour meetings with 100 participants, 30GB Drive storage, and custom email at $7.20/user/mo
Business Standard$14.40/mo24-hour meetings with 150 participants, 2TB storage, and meeting recording at $14.40/user/mo

Google Meet is the video conferencing tool that is already paid for if your company runs on Google Workspace. The wedge against Teams is browser-first joining: participants click a link and join from any modern browser without installing anything, which is a real advantage when meetings span vendors and clients on different stacks.

Free tier covers 60-minute meetings with 100 participants, ahead of Zoom Free on duration. Business Starter at $7.20/user/mo covers 24-hour meetings with 100 participants, custom email at your domain, and 30GB Drive storage. Business Standard at $14.40/mo unlocks meeting recording, 150 participants, and 2TB storage. Native integration with Google Calendar and Gmail makes scheduling friction-free, and real-time captions in 50+ languages ship on paid tiers.

The catch: no native E2E encryption (Workspace contractual data handling instead), and recording requires Business Standard at $14.40/mo. Default to Meet when Google Workspace is already on the bill or when client-facing browser-first joining matters; pay Zoom when E2E or Linux-client reliability is the wedge.

Pros

  • Business Starter at $7.20 includes Meet plus custom email and 30GB Drive
  • Free tier covers 60-minute meetings with 100 participants
  • Browser-first joining with no installer required for participants
  • Native Google Calendar and Gmail integration
  • Real-time captions in 50+ languages on paid tiers

Cons

  • No native E2E encryption (Workspace contractual data handling instead)
  • Recording requires Business Standard at $14.40 a month
Free 60-min meetingsStarter $7.20/mo, Standard $14.40/moBrowser-first joining14-day Workspace trial

Best for: Households or teams on Google Workspace who want video conferencing inside Calendar and Gmail.

Privacy
6
Video quality
9
UI
9
Value
8
Support
8
#5

Around

5.3/10$11.88/yr more

Best for casual modern team meetings

The minimalist casual-meeting pick with auto-framing, AI noise cancellation, and overlay-style participant tiles.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 45-minute meetings with up to 12 participants, noise cancellation, and auto-framing
Pro$10.99/moUnlimited meetings with recording and transcription at $10.99/mo (50-participant cap)

Around is the video conferencing tool when Zoom's 'meeting room' visual metaphor feels overweight for a 5-person engineering standup. The wedge is the UI: participant tiles are circular and overlay the screen rather than dominating it, AI auto-framing keeps faces centered, and noise cancellation runs by default rather than as an opt-in.

Free tier covers 45-minute meetings with up to 12 participants. Pro at $10.99/mo covers unlimited meetings, recording, and transcription. The product is designed for casual recurring meetings (daily standups, design crits, pair programming) rather than formal presentations.

The catch: 50-participant cap on paid limits use to small teams, no breakout rooms (not a fit for facilitated workshops), and a desktop app is required. Default to Around when daily standups and informal calls dominate the calendar; pay Zoom when participant scale or breakout rooms drive the choice.

Pros

  • Minimalist circular participant tiles overlay screen rather than dominate
  • AI auto-framing keeps faces centered automatically
  • Noise cancellation on by default (no opt-in needed)
  • Pro at $10.99 with unlimited meetings and recording
  • Designed for casual recurring meetings rather than formal presentations

Cons

  • 50-participant cap on paid tier limits use to small teams
  • No breakout rooms; not a fit for facilitated workshops
Free 45-min, 12 participantsPro $10.99/moAuto-framing + noise cancellation14-day trial

Best for: Engineering and design teams who run frequent informal calls and want lower cognitive overhead than Zoom.

Privacy
7
Video quality
9
UI
9
Value
7
Support
6
#6

Loom

5.3/10$60/yr more

Best for async video messaging

The async record-and-share video pick acquired by Atlassian in 2023, replacing live meetings with shareable recordings.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 25 videos with a 5-minute time limit and screen-plus-camera recording
Business$15.00/moUnlimited videos, no time limit, custom branding, and engagement insights at $15/mo

Loom is the video conferencing tool when the answer is record-and-share rather than schedule-and-attend. The wedge is the entire async-meeting workflow: instead of scheduling a 30-minute call to walk through a design, record a 4-minute Loom and let viewers watch on their schedule with playback speed controls, timestamped comments, and emoji reactions.

Free tier covers 25 videos with a 5-minute time limit. Business at $15/mo covers unlimited videos, no time limit, custom branding, and engagement insights showing who watched and where they paused. Atlassian acquired Loom in 2023 and is integrating it into the Atlassian Cloud (Confluence, Jira). Native browser extension and desktop app handle screen-plus-camera recording.

The catch: not for live meetings (no participant limit because there are no participants), and $15 typical is the highest paid price among our seven picks. Default to Loom when half your meetings could have been an email plus a 4-minute screen recording; pay Zoom or Teams when synchronous back-and-forth is the requirement.

Pros

  • Atlassian-acquired in 2023; deep Confluence and Jira integration coming
  • Engagement insights show who watched and where they paused
  • Unlimited videos and unlimited length on Business at $15
  • Free tier covers 25 videos with 5-minute time limit
  • Native browser extension and desktop app for screen plus camera recording

Cons

  • Not for live meetings; no live conferencing functionality
  • $15 typical is the highest paid price among our seven picks
Free 25 videos, 5-minBusiness $15/mo unlimitedAsync record-and-share14-day trial

Best for: Distributed teams who can replace half their meetings with async videos to recover calendar time.

Privacy
7
Video quality
9
UI
10
Value
8
Support
8
#7

Tandem

5.3/10

Best for always-on virtual office presence

The always-on virtual office pick with persistent rooms and see-before-you-join presence for remote-first teams.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeFree virtual office with screen sharing and Slack, Jira, and Asana integrations
Pro$10.00/moUnlimited conversation history, custom rooms, and admin controls at $10/mo

Tandem is the video conferencing tool when the workflow is not 'meet at 2 pm' but 'I am in the design room if you want to chat.' The wedge is presence: rooms persist between sessions, you can see who is in which room before joining, and conversations start with a click rather than a calendar invite.

Free tier covers the virtual office with screen sharing and integrations. Pro at $10/mo covers unlimited history, custom rooms, and admin controls. Native integrations with Slack, Jira, and Asana provide context-aware presence so teammates know what you are working on without asking. The product is designed for distributed engineering and design teams who used to chat at their desks and now need a digital equivalent.

The catch: no recording, no transcripts, no breakout rooms (the whole product is breakout rooms), and no native E2E encryption. Niche product that only works if your team adopts the always-on workflow. Default to Tandem when remote-first meeting fatigue is the problem; pay Zoom or Meet when scheduled meetings remain the dominant workflow.

Pros

  • Persistent virtual rooms with see-before-you-join presence
  • Pro at $10 a month with unlimited history
  • Free tier covers the virtual office with screen sharing
  • Designed for unstructured collaboration rather than scheduled meetings
  • Native integrations with Slack, Jira, Asana for context-aware presence

Cons

  • No recording, no transcripts, no breakout rooms
  • Niche product: only useful if your team adopts the always-on workflow
Free virtual officePro $10/mo unlimited historyAlways-on presence

Best for: Remote-first engineering and design teams who feel meeting-fatigued and want unstructured collaboration.

Privacy
7
Video quality
8
UI
8
Value
8
Support
6

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Composite weights: price 40%, features 30%, free tier 15%, editor fit 15%. Microsoft Teams and Google Meet are bundled with their workspace suites, so the standalone $6 and $7.20 typical understates the all-in value when you also need Office or Workspace. Picks are sorted composite-descending; tile overrides handle ecosystem coverage where two picks would otherwise claim the same audience.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best free tier

Zoom

Read the full review →

Cheapest paid

Microsoft Teams

Read the full review →

Best browser-first

Whereby

Read the full review →

Best workspace integration

Google Meet

Read the full review →

Best for async video

Loom

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Plus at $7 typical with gamified virtual office (avatars walking around a 2D map). Niche but editorially distinct from Tandem. Worth knowing for community events and team retreats.

How to choose your Video Conferencing Service

Live vs async vs virtual-office: which workflow fits

Live (Zoom, Teams, Meet, Whereby, Around) is the right answer when the work needs synchronous back-and-forth: kickoffs, brainstorming, sales demos, status meetings with five or more people. Async (Loom) replaces meetings whose entire content could have been an email plus a 4-minute screen recording: design walk-throughs, bug demonstrations, training videos. Virtual-office (Tandem, Gather) replaces ambient office presence with persistent digital rooms; it works when the team has already committed to the always-on workflow and fails when adoption is partial. Most teams need primarily one of these and use the other two occasionally; picking on workflow rather than feature checklist produces a better fit.

Free tier ceilings and when you outgrow them

Zoom Free caps at 40-minute meetings. Microsoft Teams Free caps at 60 minutes. Google Meet Free caps at 60 minutes. Whereby Free caps at 45 minutes. Around Free caps at 45 minutes. Loom Free caps at 25 videos with 5-minute length. Tandem Free is unlimited but with smaller team size. The signal that you have outgrown a free tier is hitting the duration cap twice in a week or running into a participant cap during a real meeting. For solo professionals running occasional client calls, free tiers cover most of the year.

Workspace integration: Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace

Microsoft Teams Business Basic at $6 a month per user includes Teams + 1TB OneDrive + web Office apps. Google Meet Business Starter at $7.20 includes Meet + custom email + 30GB Drive. Both are price-leaders in their respective ecosystems and dominate the workspace tile depending on which suite the household already uses. The decision is rarely Teams vs Meet on its own merits; it is whether your company runs on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. For households that want neither (or both), Zoom plus a separate productivity stack is the right answer.

Browser-first vs installer-required

Browser-first products (Whereby, Google Meet, Loom, Gather, Tandem) work without installing software. Participants click a link and join from any modern browser. This is a real advantage when meetings cross organizational boundaries: clients, vendors, prospects who are not going to install your video tool just for one call. Installer-required products (Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Around) trade installation friction for richer in-app features (deeper screen-share controls, better bandwidth handling on flaky connections, more device support). For external-facing work, prefer browser-first; for internal-facing work where everyone has the app, installer-required tools are usually better.

Privacy: end-to-end encryption and jurisdiction

Most video conferencing products use TLS-encrypted transport but not end-to-end encryption (the provider can decrypt the stream if compelled). Zoom and Microsoft Teams support E2E encryption on demand for sensitive meetings, with the trade-off that some features (cloud recording, transcripts) are unavailable in E2E mode. Whereby is Norway-based, which sits outside the 14 Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance. The other six picks are US-based and 14 Eyes. For regulated-industry meetings (legal, medical, financial advice), the combination of E2E + non-14-Eyes is rare; Whereby with TLS-only is the closest mainstream answer, and end-to-end encrypted alternatives like Jitsi (open source, self-host) sit outside our seven picks.

Frequently asked questions

Why is Microsoft Teams at #2 over Google Meet at #3?

Composite math. Teams Business Basic at $6 typical scores against a $10 category average; Meet Business Starter at $7.20 lands slightly higher. Both bundle the rest of their respective suites (Microsoft 365 vs Google Workspace), so the standalone comparison understates the all-in value. For Microsoft 365 households Teams is the natural pick; for Google Workspace households Meet wins. Override pin sends the workspace tile to Meet so both pick types claim a tile.

Why does Zoom show $13.33 typical when most pages quote $14.99?

Zoom Pro is $13.33 a month when paid annually ($159.96/year), or $14.99 month-to-month. Our pricing pipeline uses the annual-equivalent monthly rate. The runner-up cards correctly surface the $13.33 entry; the comparison-matrix Monthly column shows the same.

Should I use Zoom or Microsoft Teams if my company has Microsoft 365?

Use Teams. The bundle math is decisive: Teams is included in Microsoft 365 Business Basic ($6/user/month) along with OneDrive and web Office apps. Subscribing to Zoom Pro on top of an existing Microsoft 365 subscription doubles the bill for video conferencing without doubling the value. Switch to Zoom only if you have specific feature requirements (better breakout-room workflow, deeper polling, larger participant limits) that Teams cannot meet.

Does Google Meet really not need a download?

Correct. Google Meet runs entirely in modern browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari) and on Android / iOS apps. Participants click a calendar link and join from any device with a browser. There is no Mac or Windows desktop app to install. This is a real advantage when meetings cross client boundaries.

Is Whereby genuinely better for client-facing work?

Yes when the client is unwilling or unable to install software. Whereby runs entirely in the browser using WebRTC, supports custom-branded meeting rooms, and uses a Norway-based provider that sits outside the 14 Eyes alliance. The trade-off is feature depth: no transcripts, smaller third-party-integration ecosystem, $8.99 a month is more expensive than Microsoft Teams Essentials at $4. For agencies, telehealth, and external-meeting-heavy work, Whereby is the right pick.

Can Loom replace my live meetings?

Roughly half of them, on average. Async videos work for content that does not need synchronous discussion: design walk-throughs, status updates, training, bug demonstrations, code reviews of straightforward changes. They do not work for kickoffs, brainstorming, contentious feedback, or high-stakes decisions where reading the room matters. Teams that adopt Loom typically convert about half their meetings to async videos within three months.

Will my data move cleanly between video conferencing tools?

Conversation history and recordings rarely move between tools because formats differ. Recordings export as MP4 from any of the seven picks; transcripts export as text. Calendar invites and recurring meetings need to be recreated by hand because every tool generates its own meeting URLs. Plan a week of parallel use when migrating, and rebuild recurring meetings in the new tool ahead of the cutover date.

Is end-to-end encryption available on all picks?

Zoom and Microsoft Teams support E2E encryption on demand (with the trade-off that recording and transcripts are unavailable in E2E mode). Google Meet uses Workspace contractual data handling rather than E2E. Whereby, Around, Loom, and Tandem use TLS-encrypted transport without true E2E. For regulated meetings where E2E is non-negotiable, the closest answer outside our seven picks is Jitsi (open source, self-hostable).

How does the bandwidth math compare for screen-share-heavy meetings?

Zoom and Microsoft Teams handle bandwidth dropouts most gracefully because they have the deepest adaptive-bitrate engineering. Google Meet is solid but trails Zoom on flaky connections. Whereby relies on browser WebRTC, which works well on stable connections but degrades faster on poor ones. Around is optimized for small-group meetings on reliable home WiFi. For teams with field workers on cellular connections, Zoom is the safest pick; for office-only teams, the differences are marginal.

How often is this guide updated?

Pricing and feature flags refresh from our service catalog automatically when a vendor updates a plan in our database. Composite scores and tile assignments recompute on the next page render. Editorial prose (rationales, FAQ, buying-guide sections) is reviewed quarterly. Video conferencing moves slower than AI tools but faster than email marketing; we cross-check the major picks (Zoom, Teams, Meet) every two months for tier changes.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Video Conferencing Service you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides