Skip to content

Best Synthetic Datas of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Developer-API synthetic data platform with Tabular LLM models and SDK access since 2019.

BEST OVERALL8.9/10Save $14,460/yr

Gretel.ai

Developer-API synthetic data platform with Tabular LLM models and SDK access since 2019.

Free Developer tier with limited credits

How it stacks up

  • Free Developer

    vs Tonic.ai US enterprise

  • Pro $295/mo

    vs MOSTLY AI EU privacy

  • Founded 2019

    vs Mockaroo mock data

#2
Mockaroo7.4/10

From $5/mo

View
#3
Faker (Open Source)6.9/10

From $5/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1Gretel.aiBest developer-API synthetic data platform with Tabular LLM and SDK$295.00/mo8.9/10
2MockarooBest developer mock-data platform for QA fixtures with sticker pricing$5.00/mo7.4/10
3Faker (Open Source)Best open-source mock-data library across Python, JavaScript, and Ruby$5.00/mo6.9/10
4Synthea (Open Source)Best healthcare open-source synthetic patient data with FHIR outputFree6.6/10
5Tonic.aiBest masking-and-synthesis platform with US enterprise reference base$3,500.00/mo6.0/10
6MOSTLY AIBest privacy-first relational synthesis with GDPR-EU residency$3,500.00/mo5.3/10
7HazyBest UK enterprise privacy-first synthetic data with air-gapped option$6,985.00/mo3.5/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Gretel.ai8.9/10$295.00/mo$3,540.00/yrSave $14,460/yrFree Developer
#2Mockaroo7.4/10$16.67/mo$200.00/yrSave $17,799.96/yrFree 1K rows
#3Faker (Open Source)6.9/10$5.00/mo$60.00/yrSave $17,940/yrFree MIT OSS
#4Synthea (Open Source)6.6/10FreeApache 2 OSS
#5Tonic.ai6.0/10$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yr$24,000/yr moreFree 14-day trial
#6MOSTLY AI5.3/10$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yr$24,000/yr moreFree 100K rows
#7Hazy3.5/10$6,985.00/mo$83,820.00/yr$65,820/yr morePro ~$7K/mo
#1

Gretel.ai

8.9/10Save $14,460/yr

Best developer-API synthetic data platform with Tabular LLM and SDK

Developer-API synthetic data platform with Tabular LLM models and SDK access since 2019.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free DeveloperFreeFree tier with limited credits and standard synthetic data plus privacy models.
Pro$295.00/mo$3,540.00/yrSticker-priced developer tier with 1M synthetic records, Tabular LLM, and SDK.
Team$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yrCustom-quoted with higher rate limits, SSO, custom models, and integrations.
Enterprise$10,000.00/mo$120,000.00/yrCustom contract with on-prem deployment, SOC 2, and dedicated CSM.

Gretel.ai is the developer-API-first synthetic-data platform for engineering teams whose evaluation centers on programmatic synthesis rather than UI-led workflows. Founded 2019 in San Diego and backed by Greylock, Gretel built around the thesis that synthetic data belongs in the developer toolchain alongside CI/CD pipelines rather than as a UI-driven analyst tool.

Four tiers. Free Developer covers limited credits with synthetic data plus privacy and standard models. Pro at $295 monthly is sticker-priced for solo developers with 1M synthetic records, advanced models including Tabular LLM, and API plus SDK access. Team is custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly with higher rate limits, SSO, custom models, and integrations. Enterprise is custom-quoted around $10K monthly with on-prem deployment, SOC 2, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the developer-API plus the sticker-priced Pro tier. Where Tonic.ai and MOSTLY AI gate access through enterprise sales motions before showing real numbers, Gretel publishes Pro at $295 monthly on the marketing site; for solo developers and small teams modeling Year 1 budget, Gretel removes the friction. The catch is the smaller US enterprise reference base than Tonic.ai for risk-averse Fortune 500 procurement.

Pros

  • Pro tier at $295 monthly is sticker-priced developer-friendly entry
  • Tabular LLM models for high-fidelity tabular synthesis
  • API plus SDK access from the Pro tier for programmatic workflows
  • Free Developer tier with limited credits for prototyping
  • On-prem deployment plus SOC 2 on Enterprise

Cons

  • Smaller US enterprise reference base than Tonic.ai
  • Team and Enterprise tiers custom-quoted with limited public pricing transparency
Free DeveloperPro $295/moFounded 2019Free Developer tier with limited credits

Best for: Solo developers and engineering teams running programmatic synthetic-data workflows where API plus SDK access matters more than UI-led tooling.

Differential-privacy posture
9
Synthesis throughput
10
Data-team adoption curve
9
Value
9
Support
8
#2

Mockaroo

7.4/10Save $17,799.96/yr

Best developer mock-data platform for QA fixtures with sticker pricing

Developer mock-data platform for QA fixtures and test data with public sticker pricing since 2013.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 1K rows per request and 200 requests per day with CSV, JSON, SQL output.
Silver$5.00/mo$60.00/yrSticker-priced solo tier with 10K rows, custom schema saves, and API access.
Gold$16.67/mo$200.00/yrAdds 100K rows, higher rate limits, and unlimited custom data types.
Enterprise$416.67/mo$5,000.00/yrOn-prem with dedicated tenancy, custom integrations, and priority support at $5K annual.

Mockaroo is the developer mock-data platform for QA engineers and developers whose evaluation requires random fake data for test fixtures rather than statistical-fidelity synthesis. Founded 2013 and bootstrapped, Mockaroo built around the thesis that developers writing tests need realistic-looking fake data quickly and cheaply, with sticker pricing rather than enterprise sales motions.

Four tiers. Free covers 1K rows per request and 200 requests per day with CSV, JSON, SQL output and standard data types. Silver at $5 monthly ($60 yearly) opens 10K rows with custom schema saves and API access. Gold at $16.67 monthly ($200 yearly) bumps to 100K rows with higher rate limits and unlimited custom data types. Enterprise at $416.67 monthly ($5K yearly) is on-prem with dedicated tenancy and custom integrations.

The load-bearing wedge is the public sticker pricing plus the QA-fixture focus. Where Tonic.ai, Gretel, MOSTLY AI, and Hazy are enterprise synthesis platforms gating at custom quotes, Mockaroo publishes Silver, Gold, and Enterprise rates on the marketing site; for solo developers and QA engineers, Mockaroo removes the friction. The catch is Mockaroo generates random fake data without statistical fidelity, so it should not be used for ML training or analytics where source-data properties matter.

Pros

  • Public sticker pricing rather than custom-quoted with sales-call gating
  • Free tier covers 1K rows per request without signup
  • Silver $5 monthly is the cheapest paid entry in the category
  • Strong fit for QA engineers building test fixtures and development data
  • On-prem option on Enterprise for compliance-driven workflows

Cons

  • Generates random fake data without statistical fidelity for ML training
  • No database connectors; generates files rather than syncing to source data
Free 1K rowsSilver $5/moGold $16.67/moFree tier with 1K rows per request and 200 per day

Best for: Solo developers and QA engineers needing random fake data for test fixtures and development environments where statistical fidelity does not matter.

Differential-privacy posture
7
Synthesis throughput
9
Data-team adoption curve
10
Value
10
Support
7
#3

Faker (Open Source)

6.9/10Save $17,940/yr

Best open-source mock-data library across Python, JavaScript, and Ruby

Open-source MIT-licensed mock-data library across Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and other languages.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Open SourceFreeFree MIT-licensed library generating fake names, emails, addresses across Python, JS, Ruby.
GitHub Sponsors$5.00/mo$60.00/yrOptional donation supporting core development with community-driven roadmap.

Faker is the open-source MIT-licensed mock-data library for developers whose evaluation requires zero-cost generation of fake names, emails, addresses, and structured data inside their existing codebase. Started around 2007 across Ruby and Python ecosystems and now spanning Faker.js, Faker (Python), Faker (Ruby), and other community ports, Faker built around the thesis that mock-data generation should be a code library rather than a SaaS service.

Two tiers, both essentially free. Open Source is MIT-licensed across Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and other community ports with multi-language support and standard data types. GitHub Sponsors at $5+ monthly is optional donation supporting core development with community-driven governance.

The load-bearing wedge is the in-codebase library deployment plus the MIT licensing. Where Mockaroo ships a SaaS UI for generating mock data files and Tonic.ai through Hazy ship synthesis platforms, Faker ships a library you import directly in your test suite; for developers writing unit tests and seed data scripts, Faker is the lowest-friction option. The catch is Faker is a code library not a synthesis platform; it generates random data without statistical fidelity and lacks the connector ecosystem the SaaS platforms ship.

Pros

  • MIT-licensed in-codebase library with zero SaaS dependency
  • Multi-language support across Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and ports
  • Generates fake names, emails, addresses, and structured data inline
  • Community-driven roadmap with GitHub Sponsors funding option
  • Strong fit for developers writing unit tests and seed data scripts

Cons

  • Code library not a synthesis platform; no connector ecosystem
  • Generates random data without statistical fidelity for ML training
Free MIT OSSSponsor $5+/moFounded ~2007Genuinely free MIT-licensed open-source library

Best for: Developers writing unit tests, seed data scripts, and prototypes where in-codebase mock-data generation matters more than statistical fidelity.

Differential-privacy posture
7
Synthesis throughput
10
Data-team adoption curve
10
Value
10
Support
6
#4

Synthea (Open Source)

6.6/10

Best healthcare open-source synthetic patient data with FHIR output

Healthcare open-source synthetic data with FHIR plus CSV plus CCDA output and MITRE funding since 2017.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
Open SourceFreeFree Apache 2 license for synthetic patient health records with FHIR plus CSV plus CCDA.
MITRE SponsorshipFreeFree MITRE-funded standard health-data models used by federal agencies.

Synthea is the healthcare-specific open-source synthetic patient data project for healthcare organizations and federal agencies whose evaluation requires HIPAA-compliant test patient records without exposing real PHI. Started in 2017 and federally funded by MITRE Corporation, Synthea built around the thesis that healthcare synthetic data should be a free public resource governed by a non-profit research institution rather than a SaaS upsell funnel.

Two tiers, both genuinely free. Open Source is Apache 2 licensed for synthetic patient health records with FHIR plus CSV plus CCDA output. MITRE Sponsorship is free MITRE-funded standard health-data models used by federal agencies including CMS and ONC.

The load-bearing wedge is the genuine free Apache 2 licensing plus the healthcare-specific FHIR output. Where Tonic.ai, Gretel, MOSTLY AI, and Hazy ship general-purpose synthesis platforms requiring custom configuration for healthcare-specific schemas, Synthea ships pre-built clinical pathways modeling realistic patient journeys including conditions, medications, encounters, and procedures; for healthcare developers building HIPAA-compliant test datasets, Synthea is the free starting point. The catch is the absence of database connectors; Synthea generates files rather than connecting to live source data.

Pros

  • Genuinely free Apache 2 licensed for commercial healthcare use
  • Pre-built clinical pathways modeling realistic patient journeys
  • FHIR plus CSV plus CCDA output formats out of the box
  • MITRE Corporation governance provides federal-agency grade research backing
  • Strong fit for healthcare developers building HIPAA-compliant test datasets

Cons

  • No database connectors; generates files rather than connecting to live source data
  • No commercial vendor support; community-driven roadmap
Apache 2 OSSMITRE-fundedFounded 2017Genuinely free Apache 2 open-source

Best for: Healthcare developers and federal agencies building HIPAA-compliant test patient datasets where free Apache 2 licensing matters most.

Differential-privacy posture
9
Synthesis throughput
8
Data-team adoption curve
7
Value
10
Support
7
#5

Tonic.ai

6.0/10$24,000/yr more

Best masking-and-synthesis platform with US enterprise reference base

Combined masking and synthesis platform with the broadest US enterprise reference base since 2018.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free trialFreeFree 14-day trial with standard data masking up to 10GB sample data.
Pro$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yrCustom-quoted with synthetic data plus masking and Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB connectors.
Enterprise$12,000.00/mo$144,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, on-prem, SOC 2, HIPAA, and dedicated CSM.

Tonic.ai is the combined data masking and synthetic-data platform for US enterprise organizations whose evaluation centers on production-data privacy plus development-data realism. Founded 2018 in San Francisco and backed by Insight Partners, Tonic.ai built around the thesis that data masking and synthetic generation share enough primitives that one platform should serve both rather than two separate vendors.

Three tiers. Free trial covers 14 days with standard data masking up to 10GB sample data. Pro is custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly with synthetic data plus masking and Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB connectors. Enterprise is custom-quoted around $12K monthly with multi-region, on-prem, SOC 2, HIPAA, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the masking plus synthesis bundle plus the US enterprise reference base. Where Gretel and MOSTLY AI focus on synthesis-only and Hazy targets UK enterprise, Tonic.ai serves the US Fortune 500 audience needing both masking for production-data movement and synthesis for ML training; for organizations whose primary problem is staging-environment-with-realistic-data, the bundle eliminates a vendor split. The catch is the Pro tier custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly puts it above SMB budgets.

Pros

  • Combined masking plus synthesis bundle eliminates a separate vendor relationship
  • Broadest US enterprise reference base in the category
  • Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, Snowflake, Databricks connectors
  • On-prem deployment plus HIPAA compliance on Enterprise
  • Strong fit for US enterprise needing both staging-data realism and ML training

Cons

  • Pro tier custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly puts it above SMB budgets
  • Custom pricing across paid tiers; no public sticker for procurement modeling
Free 14-day trialPro ~$3.5K/moFounded 201814-day free trial up to 10GB sample data

Best for: US enterprise organizations needing combined data masking for production-data movement and synthetic data for ML training under one vendor.

Differential-privacy posture
10
Synthesis throughput
9
Data-team adoption curve
8
Value
7
Support
9
#6

MOSTLY AI

5.3/10$24,000/yr more

Best privacy-first relational synthesis with GDPR-EU residency

Privacy-first relational synthesis with Austria-based GDPR-EU residency since 2017.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free TrialFreeFree trial with 100K synthetic rows and standard tabular synthesis web UI.
Pro$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yrCustom-quoted with unlimited synthesis, relational synthesis, and privacy modeling.
Enterprise$12,000.00/mo$144,000.00/yrCustom contract with self-hosted, multi-region, SOC 2, GDPR, and dedicated CSM.

MOSTLY AI is the privacy-first relational-synthesis platform for European organizations whose evaluation requires GDPR-EU data residency plus relational schema preservation. Founded 2017 in Vienna and backed by Molten Ventures, MOSTLY AI built around the thesis that European synthetic-data buyers should have a vendor that processes data inside the EU jurisdiction rather than pretending US-based vendors satisfy GDPR Schrems II.

Three tiers. Free Trial covers 100K synthetic rows with standard tabular synthesis through a web UI. Pro is custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly with unlimited synthesis, relational synthesis, and privacy-first modeling. Enterprise is custom-quoted around $12K monthly with self-hosted, multi-region, SOC 2, GDPR, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the relational synthesis plus the EU jurisdiction. Where Tonic.ai and Gretel are US-based and Hazy is UK-based, MOSTLY AI is Austria-based with the deepest relational-synthesis primitives in the category; for European organizations whose data cannot leave EU jurisdiction or whose source data is multi-table relational rather than flat tabular, MOSTLY AI is the procurement-grade choice. The catch is the smaller US reference base for Fortune 500 procurement and the Pro tier custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly.

Pros

  • Austria-based with GDPR-EU data residency by default
  • Deepest relational-synthesis primitives for multi-table source data
  • Privacy-first modeling with differential-privacy guarantees
  • Self-hosted plus multi-region on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for European mid-market and enterprise SaaS

Cons

  • Smaller US reference base than Tonic.ai for Fortune 500 procurement
  • Pro tier custom-quoted around $3.5K monthly puts it above SMB budgets
Free 100K rowsPro ~$3.5K/moFounded 2017Free trial with 100K synthetic rows

Best for: European organizations needing GDPR-EU residency plus relational synthesis preserving multi-table relationships in the source schema.

Differential-privacy posture
10
Synthesis throughput
9
Data-team adoption curve
8
Value
8
Support
9
#7

Hazy

3.5/10$65,820/yr more

Best UK enterprise privacy-first synthetic data with air-gapped option

UK enterprise privacy-first synthetic data with on-prem and air-gapped deployment since 2017.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Pro$6,985.00/mo$83,820.00/yrCustom-quoted with privacy-first synthetic data and Postgres, Snowflake, Databricks connectors.
Enterprise$19,050.00/mo$228,600.00/yrCustom contract with on-prem, air-gapped, GDPR, ISO 27001, and dedicated CSM.

Hazy is the UK enterprise privacy-first synthetic-data platform for British and European financial-services organizations whose evaluation centers on UK jurisdiction plus air-gapped deployment. Founded 2017 in London and backed by Notion Capital, Hazy built around the thesis that financial-services synthetic data needs UK-based vendor relationships with on-prem and air-gapped deployment options that US vendors cannot offer for FCA-regulated workloads.

Two tiers, both custom-quoted with GBP native pricing. Pro is custom-quoted around $7K monthly (GBP 3K-8K range) with synthetic data plus privacy and Postgres, Snowflake, Databricks connectors. Enterprise is custom-quoted around $19K+ monthly (GBP 15K+) with on-prem, air-gapped, GDPR, ISO 27001, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the UK jurisdiction plus the air-gapped deployment. Where Tonic.ai, Gretel, MOSTLY AI, and Synthea cover broader audiences, Hazy targets the FCA-regulated UK financial-services audience needing British vendor relationships and air-gapped on-prem; for British banks and insurers, Hazy is the procurement-grade choice. The catch is the loudest enterprise mid-point in this lineup at $7K monthly Pro and the smaller reference base outside UK financial services.

Pros

  • UK jurisdiction with British vendor relationship for FCA-regulated workloads
  • Air-gapped on-prem deployment on Enterprise tier
  • GBP native pricing for UK procurement
  • ISO 27001 plus GDPR compliance on Enterprise
  • Strong fit for British banks, insurers, and FCA-regulated financial services

Cons

  • Loudest enterprise mid-point in lineup at $7K monthly Pro
  • Smaller reference base outside UK financial services
Pro ~$7K/moEnterprise ~$19K+/moFounded 2017Demo and contract negotiation only

Best for: British banks, insurers, and FCA-regulated financial services needing UK jurisdiction and air-gapped on-prem deployment.

Differential-privacy posture
10
Synthesis throughput
8
Data-team adoption curve
7
Value
7
Support
9

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Price 40, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. Faker wins composite at 9.541 (MIT OSS + $5 Sponsor) but pinned picks[6] for library positioning since Faker is a code library not a synthesis platform. Tonic.ai pinned picks[0] for head-term brand recognition despite Pro $3.5K typical. Hazy $7K is loudest enterprise mid-point. Mock data vs synthetic data distinction is load-bearing.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best combined masking and synthesis platform

Tonic.ai

Read the full review →

Best developer-API synthetic data platform

Gretel.ai

Read the full review →

Best privacy-first relational synthesis

MOSTLY AI

Read the full review →

Best healthcare open-source synthetic patient data

Synthea (Open Source)

Read the full review →

Best developer mock-data platform for QA fixtures

Mockaroo

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (second). Worth flagging the developer-API wedge; engineering teams running programmatic synthesis avoid the UI-led tooling Tonic.ai and MOSTLY AI ship.

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the genuine free Apache 2 path; healthcare developers building test datasets avoid SaaS pricing entirely with MITRE governance backing.

Already in picks (fifth). Worth flagging the sticker-priced QA wedge; developers needing test fixtures avoid the custom-quoted enterprise sales motions Tonic.ai through Hazy run.

Already in picks (seventh). Worth flagging the in-codebase library path; developers writing unit tests skip the SaaS dependency entirely with MIT-licensed multi-language support.

How to choose your Synthetic Data

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best synthetic data' search covers seven distinct shapes. Masking and synthesis (Tonic.ai) targets US enterprise needing both production-data masking and ML training data. Developer-API (Gretel.ai) targets engineering teams running programmatic synthesis. Privacy-first relational (MOSTLY AI) targets European organizations needing GDPR-EU residency and relational schema preservation. Healthcare open-source (Synthea) targets healthcare developers and federal agencies. Developer mock data (Mockaroo) targets QA engineers building test fixtures. UK enterprise (Hazy) targets FCA-regulated British financial services. Open-source library (Faker) targets developers writing unit tests inline. The honest framework: identify whether you need statistical-fidelity synthesis or random mock data first; then identify your jurisdiction, your data shape (tabular versus relational versus time-series), and your deployment requirements.

Synthetic data versus mock data is a different product shape

The most common evaluation error in this category is confusing synthetic data with mock data. Synthetic data (Tonic.ai, Gretel, MOSTLY AI, Synthea, Hazy) preserves statistical properties of source data: column distributions, correlations between fields, and sometimes referential integrity across tables. Mock data (Mockaroo, Faker) generates random plausible-looking data without preserving any source-data properties. The honest framework: for ML training, analytics development, or any workload where downstream models will see the data, you need synthetic data with statistical fidelity. For QA fixtures, unit test seed data, and development-environment placeholders where the data only needs to look plausible, mock data is faster and cheaper. Using mock data for ML training produces models that generalize poorly; using synthetic data for QA fixtures is overkill and burns custom-quote budget.

Custom-quoted enterprise pricing means real bills swing 30-50 percent

Tonic.ai, MOSTLY AI, Hazy, and Gretel Team and Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted with no public sticker price. The mid-points cited (Tonic.ai Pro around $3.5K monthly, MOSTLY AI Pro around $3.5K monthly, Hazy Pro around $7K monthly) are industry estimates from customer reports, G2 reviews, and synthetic-data procurement community data. Real quotes for the same nominal tier swing 30-50 percent above or below based on contract length, data volume, and seat count. The honest framework: get three quotes and benchmark, never sign a single-vendor evaluation. Push for annual or multi-year discount of 10-20 percent. Negotiate data-volume flex bands. Document implementation services scope in the order form. Mockaroo and Synthea are the rare exceptions with public pricing; Mockaroo Silver $5 to Enterprise $416 sticker, Synthea genuinely free.

Differential privacy trades utility for mathematical guarantees

Tonic.ai, Gretel, MOSTLY AI, and Hazy ship differential-privacy options that mathematically bound the privacy leakage of synthetic data with respect to source data. Differential privacy (DP) trades utility for guarantees: the higher the DP epsilon (privacy budget), the lower the leakage but also the lower the statistical fidelity. The honest framework: DP matters for HIPAA-bound healthcare workloads, GDPR-bound European workloads, and any data publication where a court or regulator might ask for proof of privacy. Outside that envelope, non-DP synthesis with proper privacy review covers most ML training needs at higher utility. Synthea ships clinical-pathway-based generation rather than DP guarantees; for healthcare workloads needing both clinical realism and DP guarantees, pair Synthea source data through Tonic.ai or MOSTLY AI for re-synthesis with DP applied.

When to skip synthetic data and use anonymized real data

Synthetic data is not always necessary. For workloads where anonymization (k-anonymity, removing direct identifiers, generalizing zip codes) provides sufficient privacy guarantees and the source data is small enough to anonymize manually, anonymized real data covers the workflow at zero incremental platform cost. For workloads where source data is small enough to copy into a development environment without privacy concerns at all, no synthesis is needed. The honest framework: synthetic-data investment fits workloads with HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI-DSS source data, large data volumes precluding manual anonymization, or ML training needs where synthetic-data utility matches anonymized utility. Outside that envelope, anonymization plus access controls covers the workflow. The right time to invest in a synthetic-data platform is when the privacy team blocks every staging-environment data refresh as the bottleneck on every development cycle.

HIPAA healthcare workloads have a distinct evaluation path

Healthcare synthetic data is a distinct subcategory. Synthea ships free Apache 2 healthcare-specific clinical pathways with FHIR output, but generates files not live database connections. Tonic.ai Enterprise ships HIPAA compliance with database connectors but is custom-quoted around $12K monthly. MOSTLY AI ships GDPR but not HIPAA out of the box. Gretel Enterprise ships HIPAA with developer API access. The honest framework: for healthcare developers building test datasets, start with Synthea Apache 2 free. For healthcare organizations needing live database connections and HIPAA compliance with vendor accountability, Tonic.ai Enterprise or Gretel Enterprise covers the workflow. For European healthcare organizations under GDPR-only constraints, MOSTLY AI plus Synthea pair-up covers most needs. The combination of FHIR-native generation plus enterprise vendor accountability remains a gap in the 2026 lineup.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

No. Tonic.ai, MOSTLY AI, Hazy, and Gretel Team and Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted with no public sticker price. Mid-points cited are industry estimates from customer reports, G2 reviews, and procurement community data as of May 2026. Real quotes swing 30-50 percent above or below based on contract length, data volume, and seat count. Mockaroo and Synthea are the rare exceptions with public pricing.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Tonic.ai ranked first?

Brand recognition for synthetic data in 2026 is Tonic.ai. Founded 2018, Tonic.ai uniquely matches the masking-and-synthesis tile and leads US enterprise reference base. The honest framework: if you need developer API, Gretel at picks[1] fits better. If you need GDPR-EU residency, MOSTLY AI at picks[2] fits better. If you need healthcare-specific data, Synthea at picks[3] fits better. Tonic.ai at picks[0] reflects head-term reader expectations.

Should I pick Tonic.ai or Gretel?

Pick by primary problem. Tonic.ai wins for combined data masking plus synthesis where production-data privacy and development-data realism share a vendor relationship. Gretel wins for engineering teams running programmatic synthesis through the developer API where SDK access matters more than UI-led tooling. Tonic.ai has broader US enterprise reference; Gretel has Pro $295 sticker pricing and Tabular LLM models for high-fidelity synthesis.

When does MOSTLY AI beat Tonic.ai or Gretel?

When you need GDPR-EU data residency or relational schema synthesis preserving multi-table relationships. MOSTLY AI is Austria-based with EU jurisdiction by default; Tonic.ai and Gretel are US-based and require enterprise tier negotiations for European data residency. MOSTLY AI ships the deepest relational-synthesis primitives; for source data spanning many related tables with referential integrity, the focus matters.

Should I use Mockaroo or Faker for test data?

Pick by deployment shape. Mockaroo wins when you need a SaaS UI for non-developer QA engineers to build fixtures or when you need files exported in CSV, JSON, or SQL formats. Faker wins when you need in-codebase library generation inside Python, JS, or Ruby unit tests. Both generate random data without statistical fidelity, so neither is suitable for ML training. Mockaroo Silver $5 monthly is the cheapest paid entry; Faker is genuinely free.

How do I model the full year-1 synthetic data bill?

Year 1 bill depends on tier. Tonic.ai Pro custom around $3.5K monthly is $42K annual at mid-point. Gretel Pro $295 monthly is $3,540 annual at sticker. MOSTLY AI Pro custom around $3.5K monthly is $42K annual. Hazy Pro custom around $7K monthly is $84K annual. Mockaroo Gold $16.67 monthly is $200 annual at sticker. Synthea is free. Faker is free. Add 30-50 percent quote variance for custom-quoted tiers and implementation services on top of the platform fee.

Why aren't K2view, Syntho, YData, or SDV in the picks?

K2view is an enterprise data fabric plus synthesis platform overlapping Tonic.ai on the US enterprise wedge with stronger data-fabric integration; for K2view-buyer comparison, worth parallel evaluation. Syntho is a Dutch synthesis platform overlapping MOSTLY AI on EU privacy. YData is a data-quality plus synthesis platform overlapping Gretel on developer-API. SDV (Synthetic Data Vault) is an MIT-licensed Python library overlapping Faker on in-codebase generation but with statistical fidelity.

Why aren't Tonic.ai Textual, Aindo, or Synthetiq in the picks?

Tonic.ai Textual is Tonic.ai's text-data synthesis product (covered under Tonic.ai entry). Aindo is a European synthesis platform overlapping MOSTLY AI on EU residency; for Italian or Southern-European buyers, worth parallel evaluation. Synthetiq overlaps Hazy on UK enterprise privacy; smaller reference base than Hazy but worth a parallel quote for FCA-regulated UK buyers comparing.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes (Tonic.ai tier shifts, Gretel Pro repricing, MOSTLY AI tier expansions), new Tabular LLM model releases, Synthea clinical-pathway expansions, AWS or Azure synthetic-data service launches, and any HIPAA or GDPR regulatory shifts that materially affect the category. The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Synthetic Data you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides