Skip to content

Best Spreadsheet Apps of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

OSS self-hostable spreadsheet-database under Apache 2.0 with cloud and self-host options.

BEST OVERALL8.0/10Save $144/yr

Grist

OSS self-hostable spreadsheet-database under Apache 2.0 with cloud and self-host options.

Free dev tier plus OSS self-host; cancel-anytime monthly

How it stacks up

  • Free + OSS self-host

    vs Rows mainstream AI

  • Pro $8/user/mo

    vs Equals SQL-native

  • Team $22/user/mo

    vs Visor SaaS sync

#2
Rows7.5/10

From $8/mo

View
#3
Visor6.6/10

From $9/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingScore
1GristBest OSS self-hostable spreadsheet-database under Apache 2.0$8.00/mo8.0/10
2RowsBest mainstream AI-native spreadsheet for modern teams$8.00/mo7.5/10
3VisorBest SaaS sync spreadsheet for Jira, HubSpot, Salesforce$9.00/mo6.6/10
4QuadraticBest programming-language spreadsheet for technical users$20.00/mo6.4/10
5SourcetableBest AI assistant spreadsheet with warehouse data sources$20.00/mo5.7/10
6EqualsBest SQL-native spreadsheet for data analysts$29.00/mo4.7/10
7CausalBest financial modeling spreadsheet for FP&A teams$50.00/mo4.5/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Top spec
#1Grist8.0/10$8.00/mo$96.00/yrSave $144/yrFree + OSS self-host
#2Rows7.5/10$8.00/mo$96.00/yrSave $144/yrFree dev tier
#3Visor6.6/10$9.00/mo$108.00/yrSave $132/yrFree dev tier
#4Quadratic6.4/10$20.00/mo$240.00/yrFree 3 files
#5Sourcetable5.7/10$20.00/mo$240.00/yrFree dev tier
#6Equals4.7/10$29.00/mo$348.00/yr$108/yr moreFree 5 workbooks
#7Causal4.5/10$50.00/mo$600.00/yr$360/yr moreFree 100 inputs
#1

Grist

8.0/10Save $144/yr

Best OSS self-hostable spreadsheet-database under Apache 2.0

OSS self-hostable spreadsheet-database under Apache 2.0 with cloud and self-host options.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free PersonalFreeUp to 5 docs of 5MB each plus self-host OSS option.
Pro$8.00/mo$96.00/yrUnlimited docs, custom domain, sharing, 1GB per doc.
Team$22.00/mo$264.00/yrGranular permissions, audit logs, forms, integrations.
Enterprise$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrSelf-hosted enterprise, SSO, dedicated CSM.

Grist is the OSS self-hostable spreadsheet for teams under data-residency or vendor-lock-in constraints. Founded in 2017 by ex-Google Sheets team members, Grist combines spreadsheet familiarity with relational data structure (linked records, calculated columns, computed widgets) and ships under Apache 2.0 with both managed cloud and self-host paths.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free Personal ships up to 5 docs with the self-host OSS option included. Pro at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited docs with custom domain and sharing. Team adds granular permissions plus audit logs plus forms. Enterprise ships self-hosted enterprise plus SSO at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is the OSS escape hatch combined with spreadsheet-database hybrid. Where Rows, Equals, Causal, Quadratic, Sourcetable, and Visor lock you into the vendor's hosted runtime, Grist lets you self-host the entire stack on your own infrastructure under Apache 2.0; if the vendor changes terms or shuts down, you keep running. The spreadsheet-database hybrid sits between Excel-style sheets and Airtable-style databases without forcing a binary choice. The catch is fewer AI features than Rows; Grist has a Python-cell capability but does not match Rows AI-credit depth. For teams wanting OSS self-host plus spreadsheet-database hybrid, Grist Pro is the proven path.

Pros

  • Apache 2.0 OSS license with self-host included
  • Spreadsheet-database hybrid (linked records, computed columns)
  • Custom domain plus unlimited docs on Pro
  • Granular permissions plus forms on Team
  • Self-hosted enterprise plus SSO on Enterprise

Cons

  • Fewer AI features than Rows or Sourcetable
  • Python-cell capability is the only programming option
Free + OSS self-hostPro $8/user/moTeam $22/user/moFree dev tier plus OSS self-host; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: Teams under data-residency or lock-in constraints. Free + OSS self-host; Pro $8/user/mo annual; Team $22/user/mo for permissions.

Data residency
10
Calculation engine
8
Spreadsheet familiarity
8
Value
10
Support
7
#2

Rows

7.5/10Save $144/yr

Best mainstream AI-native spreadsheet for modern teams

Mainstream AI-native spreadsheet with the deepest AI-credit catalog.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFree100 AI credits per month with 50 cell connections for solo learning.
Plus$8.00/mo$96.00/yrUnlimited cell connections plus 500 AI credits for solo founders.
Pro$19.00/mo$228.00/yr5K AI credits, premium integrations, sharing and branding.
Enterprise$50.00/mo$600.00/yrSSO, audit logs, RBAC, dedicated success manager.

Rows is the default modern AI-native spreadsheet for most readers in this category. Founded in 2016 in Lisbon and backed by Lakestar, Rows positioned around the AI-first shape with the deepest AI-credit catalog and cleanest onboarding for non-technical users coming from Excel.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships solo learning with 100 AI credits and 50 cell connections. Plus at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited cell connections plus 500 AI credits monthly. Pro adds 5K AI credits plus premium integrations plus sharing. Enterprise ships SSO plus audit logs plus RBAC at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is how natural Rows feels for users coming from Excel. Where Equals demands SQL and Quadratic demands Python, Rows lets a non-technical reader paste a question into the AI prompt and get a working formula or chart; the spreadsheet feels like Excel with an AI copilot bolted on rather than a fundamentally new tool. The catch is AI-credit metering at scale; 500 credits on Plus is enough for solo founders but not teams running daily AI-driven analyses, and the jump to Pro is roughly twice the price. For non-technical solo founders, Rows Plus is the proven default.

Pros

  • Deepest AI-credit catalog in modern spreadsheet apps
  • Excel-familiar UI with AI copilot bolted on
  • Unlimited cell connections on Plus
  • 5K AI credits plus premium integrations on Pro
  • SSO plus audit on Enterprise

Cons

  • AI-credit metering scales unpredictably with usage
  • Less powerful for SQL or Python workflows than Equals or Quadratic
Free dev tierPlus $8/user/moPro $19/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: Non-technical solo founders and small teams wanting AI-first sheets. Free for solo learning; Plus $8/user/mo annual; Pro $19/user/mo for richer use.

Data residency
8
Calculation engine
8
Spreadsheet familiarity
10
Value
9
Support
8
#3

Visor

6.6/10Save $132/yr

Best SaaS sync spreadsheet for Jira, HubSpot, Salesforce

SaaS sync spreadsheet syncing with Jira, HubSpot, and Salesforce as a project-tracking sheet.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree spreadsheet plus roadmap views with Jira and HubSpot sync.
Pro$9.00/mo$108.00/yrUnlimited views with collaboration plus premium integrations.
Business$18.00/mo$216.00/yrRoles, audit, admin controls, custom workflows.
Enterprise$50.00/mo$600.00/yrSSO, custom integrations, dedicated success manager.

Visor is the SaaS sync spreadsheet for teams that want a spreadsheet view over Jira tickets, HubSpot deals, or Salesforce records. Founded in 2017, Visor reads from Jira, HubSpot, and Salesforce, presents the data as a familiar spreadsheet with custom views and roadmap layouts, and writes changes back to the source system.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships spreadsheet plus roadmap views with Jira, HubSpot, and Salesforce sync. Pro at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited views plus collaboration plus premium integrations. Business adds roles plus audit plus admin plus custom workflows. Enterprise ships SSO plus custom integrations at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is the bidirectional sync to existing SaaS source systems. Where Rows, Equals, Causal, Quadratic, Sourcetable, and Grist treat the spreadsheet as the source of truth, Visor treats Jira, HubSpot, or Salesforce as the source and the spreadsheet as a flexible view; product managers can edit a roadmap in spreadsheet form and have changes propagate back to Jira automatically. The catch is the narrow scope; if your team is not on Jira, HubSpot, or Salesforce, Visor offers little. For PMs already on those systems wanting spreadsheet flexibility, Visor Pro is the no-brainer entry.

Pros

  • Bidirectional sync with Jira, HubSpot, Salesforce
  • Spreadsheet plus roadmap views from one project
  • Premium integrations on Pro
  • Roles plus audit plus custom workflows on Business
  • SSO plus dedicated CSM on Enterprise

Cons

  • Narrow scope (only Jira, HubSpot, Salesforce sync)
  • No AI copilot or programming-language cells
Free dev tierPro $9/user/moBusiness $18/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: PMs and revenue teams already on Jira, HubSpot, or Salesforce. Free spreadsheet plus roadmap views; Pro $9/user/mo annual; Business $18/user/mo for roles.

Data residency
8
Calculation engine
8
Spreadsheet familiarity
9
Value
8
Support
7
#4

Quadratic

6.4/10

Best programming-language spreadsheet for technical users

Programming-language-in-cells spreadsheet with Python, SQL, and JavaScript inside cells.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeUp to 3 files with Python, SQL, and JS in cells.
Pro$20.00/mo$240.00/yrUnlimited files plus 1K AI prompts plus database connectors.
Team$40.00/mo$480.00/yrTeam workspaces, sharing, roles, audit logs.
Enterprise$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrSelf-hosted option, SSO, dedicated success manager.

Quadratic is the programming-language spreadsheet for technical users who want Python, SQL, or JavaScript inside cells. Founded in 2022 in San Francisco, Quadratic supports Python (with NumPy and Pandas), SQL, and JavaScript inside cells, which makes it the only mainstream spreadsheet that lets a developer write idiomatic code instead of formula-language workarounds.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships up to 3 files with Python, SQL, and JS in cells. Pro at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited files plus 1K AI prompts plus database connectors. Team adds workspaces plus sharing plus roles plus audit logs. Enterprise ships self-hosted plus SSO at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is the multi-language cell environment. Where Rows treats AI as the workflow primitive and Equals treats SQL as primary, Quadratic treats programming languages as first-class; an engineer can write a Python loop, a SQL query, and a JavaScript transformation in three adjacent cells of the same workbook. The catch is the smaller brand recognition and the requirement that users know at least one supported language; Quadratic prices reasonably but excludes non-technical readers. For technical users wanting code-first sheets, Quadratic Pro covers the use case better than any AI-only alternative.

Pros

  • Python, SQL, and JavaScript inside cells (only one in lineup)
  • NumPy and Pandas support inside Python cells
  • Database connectors plus 1K AI prompts on Pro
  • Roles plus audit logs on Team
  • Self-hosted option plus SSO on Enterprise

Cons

  • Requires programming knowledge for full value
  • Smaller mainstream brand recognition than Rows
Free 3 filesPro $20/user/moTeam $40/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: Data engineers and developers wanting code-first sheets. Free up to 3 files; Pro $20/user/mo annual; Team $40/user/mo for shared workspaces.

Data residency
9
Calculation engine
9
Spreadsheet familiarity
7
Value
9
Support
8
#5

Sourcetable

5.7/10

Best AI assistant spreadsheet with warehouse data sources

AI assistant spreadsheet with warehouse data sources first-class.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeLimited workbooks with AI assistant and basic data sources.
Pro$20.00/mo$240.00/yrUnlimited workbooks with AI plus Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery.
Team$40.00/mo$480.00/yrTeam workspaces, roles, scheduled refresh.
Enterprise$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrSSO, audit logs, custom integrations, dedicated CSM.

Sourcetable is the AI-assistant-first spreadsheet for analysts who want a chat-like interface over warehouse data. Founded in 2020, Sourcetable foregrounds an AI assistant that ingests warehouse data (Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery) and answers analytical questions in spreadsheet cells, with the option to drop into raw SQL when the AI is wrong.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships limited workbooks with AI assistant. Pro at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited workbooks plus AI plus warehouse connectors. Team adds workspaces plus roles plus scheduled refresh. Enterprise ships SSO at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is AI-first analytical workflow over warehouse data. Where Rows leads on AI for non-technical users without database connectors, and Equals leads on SQL-first analysts, Sourcetable sits in between; you can ask the AI a question about warehouse data and get a working sheet, or drop to SQL when the AI gets it wrong. The catch is the lack of unique wedge versus Rows or Equals individually; Sourcetable competes head-on with both rather than carving a separate niche. For analysts wanting AI-first warehouse exploration with SQL escape hatch, Sourcetable Pro covers the use case but Rows or Equals may serve better.

Pros

  • AI-first interface over warehouse data
  • Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery connectors on Pro
  • SQL escape hatch when AI guess is wrong
  • Team workspaces plus scheduled refresh on Team
  • SSO plus audit on Enterprise

Cons

  • Lacks a unique wedge versus Rows or Equals individually
  • Smaller mainstream brand recognition than Rows or Equals
Free dev tierPro $20/user/moTeam $40/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: Analysts wanting AI-first warehouse exploration with SQL escape hatch. Free dev tier; Pro $20/user/mo annual; Team $40/user/mo for scheduled refresh.

Data residency
8
Calculation engine
9
Spreadsheet familiarity
8
Value
8
Support
7
#6

Equals

4.7/10$108/yr more

Best SQL-native spreadsheet for data analysts

SQL-native spreadsheet connecting Postgres, Snowflake, and BigQuery directly.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeUp to 5 workbooks with basic SQL and integrations.
Plus$29.00/mo$348.00/yrUnlimited workbooks with Postgres, Snowflake, and BigQuery.
Team$59.00/mo$708.00/yrScheduled refresh, sharing, custom roles, audit logs.
Enterprise$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrSSO, custom integrations, dedicated success manager.

Equals is the SQL-native spreadsheet for data analysts running on a warehouse. Founded in 2020 by ex-Intercom team members, Equals connects Postgres, Snowflake, and BigQuery natively and lets analysts write SQL queries that populate cells directly, with scheduled refresh keeping dashboards live.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships up to 5 workbooks with basic SQL. Plus at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited workbooks plus warehouse connectors. Team adds scheduled refresh plus sharing plus custom roles plus audit logs. Enterprise ships SSO plus custom integrations at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is how cleanly SQL queries embed inside spreadsheet cells. Where Rows treats SQL as an integration and Quadratic puts SQL alongside Python and JS, Equals treats SQL as the primary language; analysts can write a query, populate a sheet, build a chart, and schedule a refresh in minutes without leaving the spreadsheet. The catch is the steeper price than Rows or Grist; Plus at the entry per-user rate is over three times the Rows Plus rate, reflecting warehouse-connector depth but pricing out non-analyst readers. For data analysts running on a warehouse, Equals Plus is the proven path.

Pros

  • SQL queries embed natively inside cells
  • Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery connectors first-class
  • Scheduled refresh keeps dashboards live
  • Custom roles plus audit on Team
  • SSO plus custom integrations on Enterprise

Cons

  • Steeper price than Rows or Grist for non-analyst readers
  • Steeper learning curve for non-SQL users
Free 5 workbooksPlus $29/user/moTeam $59/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: Data analysts and ops teams running on a warehouse. Free up to 5 workbooks; Plus $29/user/mo annual; Team $59/user/mo for live dashboards.

Data residency
9
Calculation engine
9
Spreadsheet familiarity
7
Value
7
Support
8
#7

Causal

4.5/10$360/yr more

Best financial modeling spreadsheet for FP&A teams

Financial modeling spreadsheet with scenario modeling first-class.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeUp to 100 inputs and outputs for solo financial models.
Pro$50.00/mo$600.00/yrUnlimited models and scenarios with Stripe and QuickBooks.
Business$200.00/mo$2,400.00/yrCustom dashboards, sharing, team workspaces, roles.
Enterprise$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yrSSO, audit logs, custom integrations, dedicated CSM.

Causal is the financial modeling spreadsheet for FP&A teams running scenario analysis. Founded in 2019 in London and backed by Accel, Causal treats variables and scenarios as first-class objects rather than cells, which makes uncertainty modeling tractable in ways Excel-style cell math is not.

Four tiers serve four buyer profiles. Free ships up to 100 inputs and outputs for solo modeling. Pro at the entry per-user rate ships unlimited models plus scenarios plus Stripe and QuickBooks integrations. Business adds custom dashboards plus team workspaces plus roles. Enterprise ships SSO plus audit logs at custom pricing.

The load-bearing wedge is how naturally Causal handles uncertainty. Where Rows, Equals, and Quadratic treat numbers as deterministic cells, Causal treats numbers as probability distributions or scenario branches; an FP&A analyst can model headcount with hiring uncertainty and immediately see the revenue impact across scenarios without rebuilding. The catch is the steepest price in lineup and a learning curve for non-FP&A readers; Pro is over six times the Rows Plus rate, and the variable-and-scenario abstraction takes time to learn. For FP&A teams running scenario analysis, Causal Pro is the proven path.

Pros

  • Variables and scenarios as first-class objects
  • Probability distributions for uncertainty modeling
  • Stripe plus QuickBooks integration on Pro
  • Custom dashboards plus team workspaces on Business
  • SSO plus custom integrations on Enterprise

Cons

  • Steepest price in lineup for non-FP&A readers
  • Variable-and-scenario abstraction takes time to learn
Free 100 inputsPro $50/user/moBusiness $200/user/moFree dev tier; cancel-anytime monthly

Best for: FP&A teams running scenario analysis on revenue, expenses, headcount. Free up to 100 inputs; Pro $50/user/mo annual; Business $200/user/mo for richer use.

Data residency
9
Calculation engine
9
Spreadsheet familiarity
7
Value
6
Support
9

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

We weight price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, and fit 15. Per-user pricing means typical equals low across the lineup. The mainstream-vs-specialized decision drives the shortlist; generalists pick Rows; specialists pick Equals (SQL), Causal (FP&A), Quadratic (programming), or Grist (OSS).

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best mainstream AI-native spreadsheet

Rows

Read the full review →

Best SQL-native spreadsheet for analysts

Equals

Read the full review →

Best financial modeling spreadsheet

Causal

Read the full review →

Best programming-language spreadsheet

Quadratic

Read the full review →

Best OSS self-hostable spreadsheet

Grist

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (fifth) but worth flagging for OSS-required teams. The only Apache 2.0 self-hostable pick in lineup; matters for data-residency or vendor-lock-in constraints.

Already in picks (fourth) but worth flagging for technical users. The only no-code pick that lets you write Python, SQL, and JavaScript inside spreadsheet cells.

Already in picks (third) but worth flagging for FP&A teams. Variables and scenarios as first-class objects make uncertainty modeling tractable in a way Excel cannot.

Already in picks (seventh) but worth flagging for Jira-native teams. Bidirectional sync turns Jira tickets into a roadmap spreadsheet that writes changes back automatically.

How to choose your Spreadsheet App

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best spreadsheet apps' search covers seven distinct shapes, and most roundups conflate them with no-code app builders (Airtable, Coda) and project management (Smartsheet) which are different categories. Mainstream AI-native (Rows) targets non-technical readers wanting AI-first sheets. SQL-native (Equals) targets data analysts on warehouses. Financial modeling (Causal) targets FP&A teams. Programming-language cells (Quadratic) targets technical users. AI-with-data-sources (Sourcetable) targets analysts wanting AI-first warehouse exploration. OSS self-hostable (Grist) targets teams under data-residency constraints. SaaS sync (Visor) targets PMs on Jira or HubSpot. The honest framework: identify your role and data backbone before subscribing. Most readers will land on Rows for AI-first, Equals for SQL-first analyst workflows, or Grist for OSS self-host.

Mainstream vs specialized: pick role before pricing

The mainstream-vs-specialized decision drives the shortlist before pricing matters. Mainstream picks (Rows for AI-native generalists, Grist for OSS spreadsheet-database hybrid) cover the broadest reader profile and serve as the default starting point. Specialized picks narrow on role: Equals for SQL-first data analysts, Causal for FP&A scenario modeling, Quadratic for engineers wanting Python plus SQL plus JS in cells, Sourcetable for AI-first warehouse exploration, Visor for PMs syncing with Jira and HubSpot. The honest framework: solo founders and non-technical users pick Rows; data analysts pick Equals; FP&A pick Causal; engineers pick Quadratic; OSS-required teams pick Grist. Picking a specialized tool when a generalist would do creates friction; picking a generalist when a specialized tool exists creates capability gaps that cost more in workarounds than the price delta.

The data-source decision narrows the shortlist further

After role-vs-mainstream, the data-source decision narrows the shortlist by another half. Direct warehouse connectors (Equals, Quadratic, Sourcetable, Causal at Pro+) suit teams where Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, or MySQL is the source of truth. Spreadsheet-as-source (Rows, Grist) suit teams that build the data inside the spreadsheet itself with manual entry, integrations, or imports. Source-system sync (Visor) suits teams where Jira, HubSpot, or Salesforce is the source and the spreadsheet is a flexible view. The honest framework: the data backbone you already use should drive the platform choice. For warehouse-native ops teams, Equals is the no-brainer entry. For Jira-native PM teams, Visor wins. For greenfield use cases without an existing data source, Rows custom database or Grist spreadsheet-database hybrid covers the broadest functionality.

AI-credit metering and per-user pricing scale unpredictably

Modern spreadsheet apps charge by usage proxies that are hard to predict before launch. Rows meters AI credits (100 free, 500 on Plus, 5K on Pro). Quadratic meters AI prompts (100 free, 1K on Pro). Causal meters inputs and outputs (100 on free). Equals, Sourcetable, Visor, and Grist charge per user with no AI metering. The honest framework: do not commit to the entry tier without modeling realistic usage. A Rows team running daily AI-driven analyses can burn through 500 credits in a week; a Quadratic team running AI-assisted SQL can burn 1K prompts in days. The tier-jump multiples are steep across the lineup; Rows Plus to Pro is roughly 2.4 times the price, Equals Plus to Team is roughly 2 times. Before launching, simulate one month of expected usage with a dummy workbook to confirm the entry tier covers it.

When OSS self-host (Grist) beats SaaS spreadsheet apps

Grist is the only OSS self-hostable pick in lineup, and it matters more than vendor-led roundups suggest. The honest framework: pick Grist OSS self-host when (1) data-residency requirements (HIPAA, GDPR special-category, or jurisdictional) mandate that data stays on your infrastructure, (2) vendor lock-in risk is unacceptable for the use case (mission-critical workflows, decade-long ownership), (3) cost at scale exceeds SaaS economics (300+ users where per-user pricing exceeds self-host operational cost). Self-host pays infrastructure (Node.js plus database server, roughly the same shape as a Next.js app) and absorbs the operational tax of patching, backups, and uptime. For teams where SaaS is acceptable, Rows or Equals cover better at less operational overhead. For teams where data-residency or lock-in matters, Grist is the only option in lineup that delivers; the Apache 2.0 license guarantees you can keep running indefinitely even if the vendor changes terms or shuts down.

When Excel or Google Sheets still wins

Modern spreadsheet apps do not replace Excel and Google Sheets for every use case. Stick with Excel or Google Sheets when (1) collaboration is with non-technical readers who already use those tools, (2) the spreadsheet is personal and modern AI features are not load-bearing, (3) IT or finance mandates Excel for audit reasons, (4) Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace integration depth is load-bearing (Power BI, Looker Studio, Office macros). Modern spreadsheet apps win when (1) AI-first workflows are core (Rows, Quadratic), (2) warehouse connection is required and Excel Power Query is too clunky (Equals, Sourcetable), (3) scenario modeling is core (Causal), (4) OSS self-host is required (Grist), (5) source-system sync is required (Visor). Both can coexist.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

Vendor pricing changes regularly. Rates here are what each vendor advertises in May 2026. Rows Plus $8/user/mo annual stable. Equals Plus $29/user/mo annual stable. Causal Pro $50/user/mo annual stable. Quadratic Pro $20/user/mo annual stable. Sourcetable Pro $20/user/mo annual stable. Grist Pro $8/user/mo annual stable. Visor Pro $9/user/mo annual stable. Verify current rates on the vendor site before committing to annual prepay.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership.

Why is Rows ranked first instead of cheaper Grist or specialized Equals?

Rows wins both mainstream brand-recognition consensus across Zapier, NoCode.tech, G2, and Capterra AND uniquely-true on the mainstream-AI-spreadsheet flag. Grist ties Rows on price (both at the entry per-user rate) and wins the OSS tile, but does not match Rows AI-credit depth or non-technical onboarding. Equals is more expensive (over three times Rows Plus) and serves a narrower SQL-analyst audience. Rows is the right starting point for most readers.

Should I pick a modern spreadsheet app over Excel or Google Sheets?

Pick modern when AI-first workflows are core (Rows, Quadratic), warehouse connection is required (Equals, Sourcetable), scenario modeling is core (Causal), OSS self-host is required (Grist), or source-system sync is required (Visor). Stick with Excel or Google Sheets for collaboration with non-technical readers, personal use without AI needs, IT-mandated Excel for compliance, or Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace integration depth. Both can coexist; pick modern for the workflows above.

When does Equals beat Rows for analytical workflows?

When SQL queries against a warehouse are the primary workflow. Equals connects Postgres, Snowflake, and BigQuery directly and treats SQL as the language of the spreadsheet; Rows treats SQL as an integration. Equals Plus is over three times Rows Plus, but for data analysts running daily warehouse queries, the cost is justified by the workflow speed. Rows wins for non-technical users who want AI-first sheets without a database backbone.

Should I use Causal or a custom Excel model for FP&A?

Causal when scenario modeling and uncertainty are core to the work. Causal treats variables and scenarios as first-class objects; Excel forces you to recreate the same model multiple times for different assumptions. Causal Pro is the steepest price in lineup but pays back when modeling complex businesses with multiple drivers. Excel wins for simple deterministic models, audit-mandated workflows, or teams that already have a robust Excel-based FP&A practice.

When does Quadratic beat Equals for SQL workflows?

When you also need Python or JavaScript alongside SQL. Quadratic supports Python (with NumPy and Pandas), SQL, and JavaScript inside cells; Equals is SQL-only. Quadratic Pro is cheaper than Equals Plus, but Equals has deeper warehouse connector polish. Quadratic wins for engineers and data scientists who want a multi-language environment; Equals wins for analysts who only need SQL plus dashboard polish.

Why are Airtable, Coda, and Smartsheet not in this lineup?

Different category. Airtable and Coda are spreadsheet-database hybrids that sit in our /best/no-code-app-builders guide because the primary use case is building internal apps, not crunching numbers. Smartsheet is project-management and competes against Asana, Monday, ClickUp. The picks here target the Excel and Google Sheets replacement use case for analysts, finance, engineers, and AI-first founders.

What happens if my modern spreadsheet vendor raises prices or shuts down?

Six of the seven picks have no code-export, which means you migrate workbooks manually if the vendor changes terms or shuts down. Grist is the exception; the Apache 2.0 OSS license lets you self-host the entire stack indefinitely. For warehouse-connected sheets (Equals, Quadratic, Sourcetable, Causal), data lives in the warehouse and survives; you only lose the front-end. For Rows and Visor, both data and front-end live in the vendor; export workbooks to CSV on a schedule.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes (rates stable through May 2026), new entrants, AI-credit-pricing model changes, and Grist OSS license changes. The lastReviewed date at the top reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Spreadsheet App you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides