Skip to content

Best SOARs of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Modern dev-friendly SOAR brand leader with Community Free 3 stories and Professional with Tines AI.

BEST OVERALL8.5/10Save $22,800/yr

Tines

Modern dev-friendly SOAR brand leader with Community Free 3 stories and Professional with Tines AI.

Community Free 3 stories; Professional 14-day trial

How it stacks up

  • Community Free 3 stories

    vs Cortex XSOAR enterprise

  • Professional ~$25k/yr

    vs Splunk SOAR Phantom heritage

  • Enterprise on-prem

    vs Torq hyperautomation

#2
Torq7.8/10

From $2,500/mo

View
#3
Splunk SOAR6.9/10

From $4,200/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1TinesBest modern mainstream SOAR with the broadest community adoption since 2018$2,100.00/mo8.5/10
2TorqBest hyperautomation SOAR with AI agents and AI Analyst as primary use case$2,500.00/mo7.8/10
3Splunk SOARBest Splunk-bundled SOAR with Mission Control integration and Cisco bundle$4,200.00/mo6.9/10
4Palo Alto Cortex XSOARBest Palo Alto enterprise SOAR with 800+ integrations and Cortex XSIAM bundle$5,000.00/mo6.3/10
5IBM QRadar SOARBest IBM-bundled SOAR with X-Force threat intelligence and on-prem option$4,200.00/mo4.6/10
6SwimlaneBest low-code enterprise SOAR with Active Sensing and cross-team automation$3,800.00/mo3.9/10
7D3 SecurityBest MITRE-driven SOAR with AI triage and tier-1 plus tier-2 automation$4,200.00/mo3.7/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Tines8.5/10$2,100.00/mo$25,000.00/yrSave $22,800/yrCommunity Free 3 stories
#2Torq7.8/10$2,500.00/mo$30,000.00/yrSave $18,000/yrCommunity 100 runs/mo
#3Splunk SOAR6.9/10$4,200.00/mo$50,000.00/yr$2,400/yr moreCommunity 100 actions/day
#4Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR6.3/10$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yr$12,000/yr moreCommunity 100 incidents/day
#5IBM QRadar SOAR4.6/10$4,200.00/mo$50,000.00/yr$2,400/yr moreStandard ~$50k/yr
#6Swimlane3.9/10$7,500.00/mo$90,000.00/yr$42,000/yr moreTurbine Cloud ~$45k/yr
#7D3 Security3.7/10$8,500.00/mo$102,000.00/yr$54,000/yr moreSmart SOAR ~$50k/yr
#1

Tines

8.5/10Save $22,800/yr

Best modern mainstream SOAR with the broadest community adoption since 2018

Modern dev-friendly SOAR brand leader with Community Free 3 stories and Professional with Tines AI.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
CommunityFreeFree for individuals with up to three stories and one user with unlimited actions.
Professional$2,100.00/mo$25,000.00/yrUnlimited stories with five users plus Tines AI, reporting, and audit logs.
Enterprise$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrOn-prem deployment plus Tenant and Workbench with SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

Tines is the modern dev-friendly SOAR for SOC engineers whose evaluation defaults to the platform with the broadest community adoption and free Community tier. Founded 2018 in Dublin, Tines built around the thesis that SOAR should ship as a story-based no-code workflow builder rather than as enterprise playbook authoring software, with first-class HTTP webhooks and YAML-style story exports as the primary primitives.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Community covers free 3 stories and 1 user with unlimited actions and integrations. Professional covers unlimited stories with 5 users plus Tines AI, reporting, and audit logs at the entry annual rate. Enterprise opens on-prem deployment plus Tenant and Workbench with SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is community adoption plus the story-based model. Where Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR ship enterprise-grade playbook authoring with steep learning curves, Tines ships drag-and-drop story authoring that SOC engineers can pick up in an afternoon; for teams without dedicated SOAR engineers, the operational lift difference matters. The catch is the smaller integration count than Cortex XSOAR's 800+ apps plus the smaller enterprise reference base than Splunk and IBM.

Pros

  • Broadest community adoption among modern SOAR since 2018
  • Community Free 3 stories with unlimited actions and integrations
  • Tines AI bundled into Professional tier
  • Story-based no-code workflow builder with low learning curve
  • On-prem deployment plus Tenant and Workbench on Enterprise

Cons

  • Smaller integration count than Cortex XSOAR 800+ apps marketplace
  • Smaller Fortune 500 reference base than Splunk and IBM SOAR
Community Free 3 storiesProfessional ~$25k/yrEnterprise on-premCommunity Free 3 stories; Professional 14-day trial

Best for: Modern SOC engineering teams wanting story-based no-code SOAR with strong community and AI built in.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
9
Authoring overhead
10
Value
9
Support
9
#2

Torq

7.8/10Save $18,000/yr

Best hyperautomation SOAR with AI agents and AI Analyst as primary use case

Hyperautomation modern SOAR with AI agents and AI Analyst on Enterprise.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
CommunityFreeFree for up to one hundred workflow runs per month with no-code workflow builder.
Pro$2,500.00/mo$30,000.00/yrHyperautomation with AI agents, on-prem agents, and 50+ integrations.
Enterprise$6,300.00/mo$75,000.00/yrAI Analyst with GRC governance, SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

Torq is the hyperautomation-focused SOAR for SOCs whose security automation extends into IT and DevOps workflows. Founded 2020 in Israel, Torq built around the thesis that SOAR should ship as hyperautomation rather than narrow security playbook authoring, with AI agents and AI Analyst as the primary investigation primitives rather than human-authored playbooks.

Three tiers cover the lifecycle. Community covers free up to 100 workflow runs per month with no-code workflow builder and Slack plus Jira plus Splunk integrations. Pro covers hyperautomation with AI agents and on-prem agents plus 50+ integrations. Enterprise opens AI Analyst with GRC governance, SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is AI Analyst plus hyperautomation scope. Where Tines and Cortex XSOAR ship security-focused SOAR, Torq ships AI-first hyperautomation that handles security incidents alongside IT incidents, DevOps automation, and GRC compliance workflows; for SOCs whose automation roadmap extends beyond pure security, the broader scope matters. The catch is the smaller integration count than Tines plus the younger product (founded 2020) without the same Fortune 500 reference base as legacy SOAR vendors.

Pros

  • AI Analyst as primary investigation primitive on Enterprise
  • Hyperautomation extends beyond security into IT and DevOps
  • Community Free 100 workflow runs per month
  • On-prem agents on Pro tier
  • GRC governance bundled into Enterprise

Cons

  • Smaller integration count than Tines or Cortex XSOAR
  • Younger product (2020) without Fortune 500 reference base of legacy SOAR
Community 100 runs/moPro ~$30k/yrAI Analyst on EnterpriseCommunity Free 100 runs/mo; Pro trial available

Best for: SOCs whose automation roadmap extends beyond security into IT, DevOps, and GRC compliance workflows.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
9
Authoring overhead
9
Value
9
Support
8
#3

Splunk SOAR

6.9/10$2,400/yr more

Best Splunk-bundled SOAR with Mission Control integration and Cisco bundle

Splunk-bundled SOAR with Mission Control integration and Cisco bundle on Enterprise.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Community EditionFreeFree Community Edition for up to one hundred actions per day with 300+ integrations.
Standard$4,200.00/mo$50,000.00/yrFull SOAR with Splunk Mission Control integration, case management, and playbook editor.
Enterprise$8,500.00/mo$102,000.00/yrSplunk Cisco bundle with AI Assist, SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

Splunk SOAR (formerly Phantom, acquired by Splunk 2018) is the Splunk-bundled SOAR for SOCs already running Splunk Enterprise Security and want playbook automation in the same vendor relationship. Cisco acquired Splunk for $28 billion in March 2024, and Splunk SOAR now bundles into the broader Cisco SecureX strategy alongside Splunk Enterprise Security.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Community Edition covers free up to 100 actions per day with 300+ integrations and Phantom playbooks. Standard covers full SOAR with Splunk Mission Control integration, case management, and playbook editor. Enterprise opens the Splunk Cisco bundle with AI Assist, SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is Splunk ecosystem integration plus Phantom playbook heritage. Where Cortex XSOAR ships its own platform and Tines ships story-based authoring, Splunk SOAR ships native Splunk Search Processing Language integration so SOC analysts can run SPL queries inside playbooks; for Splunk-already SOCs the operational lift of switching exceeds Tines or Cortex XSOAR pricing advantages. The catch is the Phantom-era playbook authoring UI which lags modern Tines and Torq UX, plus the Cisco strategic uncertainty post-acquisition.

Pros

  • Splunk Mission Control integration for SOC unified workspace
  • Native SPL query integration inside playbooks
  • Community Edition free up to 100 actions per day
  • 300+ integrations with Phantom-era playbook library
  • Splunk Cisco bundle on Enterprise post-March-2024 acquisition

Cons

  • Phantom-era playbook authoring UI lags modern Tines and Torq UX
  • Cisco acquisition strategic uncertainty for Splunk SOAR roadmap
Community 100 actions/dayStandard ~$50k/yrCisco bundle on EnterpriseCommunity Edition free; Standard demo on request

Best for: Splunk-already SOCs with five-plus years of Phantom muscle memory plus Cisco SecureX strategic alignment.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
8
Authoring overhead
6
Value
7
Support
9
#4

Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR

6.3/10$12,000/yr more

Best Palo Alto enterprise SOAR with 800+ integrations and Cortex XSIAM bundle

Enterprise Palo Alto SOAR with 800+ integrations and Cortex XSIAM bundle on Premium.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Community EditionFreeFree Community Edition for up to one hundred incidents per day with 700+ integrations.
Standard$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrFull SOAR with threat intel, case management, Cortex content, and playbooks.
Premium$10,000.00/mo$120,000.00/yrXSIAM bundle with AI, dark web monitoring, SSO, dedicated CSM, and onboarding.

Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR is the enterprise SOAR for Fortune 500 organizations whose security stack defaults to Palo Alto Networks and want SOAR bundled into the broader Cortex XSIAM strategy. Acquired as Demisto in 2019 and rebranded Cortex XSOAR, Palo Alto built the canonical enterprise SOAR with the broadest integration marketplace at 800+ content packs.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Community Edition covers free up to 100 incidents per day with full 800+ integrations and content packs. Standard covers full SOAR with threat intel, case management, Cortex content, and playbooks. Premium opens the XSIAM bundle with AI, dark web monitoring, SSO, dedicated CSM, and onboarding.

The load-bearing wedge is integration marketplace depth plus Palo Alto ecosystem integration. Where Tines ships 200+ integrations and Splunk SOAR ships 300+, Cortex XSOAR ships 800+ content packs covering virtually every enterprise security tool; for SOC teams with 50+ security tools to orchestrate, the integration coverage matters. The catch is the Palo Alto-centric strategy; XSIAM is the future, and standalone XSOAR investments may converge into the broader XSIAM platform over the next two years.

Pros

  • Broadest integration marketplace at 800+ content packs
  • Community Edition free up to 100 incidents per day
  • XSIAM bundle on Premium tier with AI and dark web monitoring
  • Strong Fortune 500 reference base via Palo Alto Networks
  • Cortex content packs maintained by Palo Alto threat researchers

Cons

  • Palo Alto-centric strategy pushes XSOAR investment toward XSIAM convergence
  • Steep learning curve for the playbook authoring environment
Community 100 incidents/dayStandard ~$60k/yrXSIAM bundle on PremiumCommunity Edition free; Standard demo on request

Best for: Fortune 500 SOCs already on Palo Alto Networks security stack with 50+ tools to orchestrate.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
8
Authoring overhead
7
Value
7
Support
9
#5

IBM QRadar SOAR

4.6/10$2,400/yr more

Best IBM-bundled SOAR with X-Force threat intelligence and on-prem option

IBM-bundled SOAR (formerly Resilient) with X-Force threat intel and on-prem deployment.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$4,200.00/mo$50,000.00/yrIBM QRadar SOAR (formerly Resilient) with case management and playbook authoring.
Enterprise$8,333.00/mo$100,000.00/yrFull QRadar SOAR with X-Force threat intel, on-prem option, and dedicated CSM.
Mission Critical$14,583.00/mo$175,000.00/yrMission-critical workloads with multi-region, premium SLA, and embedded analyst.

IBM QRadar SOAR (formerly Resilient, IBM-acquired 2016) is the enterprise SOAR for organizations whose deployment requires IBM contractual relationships and X-Force threat intelligence. Acquired by IBM in 2016 and rebranded Security QRadar SOAR, Resilient built the canonical incident response platform with case management as the primary primitive rather than playbook automation; QRadar SOAR stays with IBM after Palo Alto Networks acquired the QRadar SaaS portion in August 2024.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Standard covers case management and playbook authoring with 180+ integrations and threat intel. Enterprise covers full QRadar SOAR with X-Force threat intel feed, on-prem option, SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM. Mission Critical opens multi-region with premium SLA and embedded analyst.

The load-bearing wedge is IBM contractual relationship plus X-Force threat intelligence depth. Where Tines and Cortex XSOAR ship cloud-native SaaS, QRadar SOAR ships on-prem appliance plus cloud, with the on-prem option meeting compliance frameworks where cloud-hosted SOAR is not feasible; for IBM-already enterprises, the consolidation matters. The catch is the smaller community than modern SOAR plus the post-2024-acquisition uncertainty around how QRadar SOAR integrates with the now-Palo-Alto-owned QRadar SIEM SaaS.

Pros

  • IBM Security QRadar bundle alongside legacy QRadar on-prem SIEM
  • X-Force threat intelligence feed on Enterprise tier
  • On-prem option for compliance-bound deployments
  • Resilient case management heritage since 2010
  • Multi-region plus premium SLA on Mission Critical

Cons

  • QRadar SaaS now owned by Palo Alto post-Aug-2024; QRadar SOAR-SIEM integration future uncertain
  • Smaller community than Tines, Cortex XSOAR, and modern SOAR
Standard ~$50k/yrX-Force threat intelResilient heritage 2010Demo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: IBM-already enterprises with regulated-industry on-prem requirements and X-Force threat intel needs.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
7
Authoring overhead
7
Value
7
Support
8
#6

Swimlane

3.9/10$42,000/yr more

Best low-code enterprise SOAR with Active Sensing and cross-team automation

Low-code enterprise SOAR with Active Sensing and cross-team Hyperautomation tier.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Turbine Cloud$3,800.00/mo$45,000.00/yrLow-code SOAR with Active Sensing, case management, and 300+ integrations.
Turbine Hyperautomation$7,500.00/mo$90,000.00/yrCross-team automation with AI plus on-prem option and governance.
Enterprise$12,500.00/mo$150,000.00/yrFull Swimlane platform with SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

Swimlane is the low-code enterprise SOAR for SOC teams whose deployment requires cross-team automation across security, IT, and compliance under a single platform. Founded 2014 in Colorado, Swimlane built around the thesis that SOAR should ship as a low-code platform with Active Sensing as the threat-detection primitive rather than dashboard-driven alert fatigue.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Turbine Cloud covers low-code SOAR with Active Sensing, case management, and 300+ integrations. Turbine Hyperautomation covers cross-team automation with AI plus on-prem option and governance. Enterprise opens the full Swimlane platform with SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is low-code platform plus Active Sensing. Where Tines and Torq ship workflow builders and Cortex XSOAR ships playbook authoring, Swimlane ships a low-code application platform where SOC teams build custom security applications on top of the SOAR primitives; for organizations needing custom security workflows beyond standard playbooks, the platform extensibility matters. The catch is the higher entry quote than Tines or Torq plus the smaller community than the modern dev-friendly competitors.

Pros

  • Low-code platform with Active Sensing for cross-team automation
  • Turbine Hyperautomation tier extends beyond pure security
  • On-prem option on Hyperautomation tier
  • Strong reference base in financial services and healthcare since 2014
  • Custom security applications built on SOAR primitives

Cons

  • Higher entry quote than Tines or Torq for similar feature scope
  • Smaller community than modern dev-friendly competitors
Turbine Cloud ~$45k/yrHyperautomation $90k+/yrActive SensingDemo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: Enterprise SOCs needing low-code custom security applications with cross-team automation reach.

Audit posture
9
Playbook latency
8
Authoring overhead
8
Value
7
Support
8
#7

D3 Security

3.7/10$54,000/yr more

Best MITRE-driven SOAR with AI triage and tier-1 plus tier-2 automation

MITRE-driven SOAR with AI triage and tier-1 plus tier-2 automation playbooks.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Smart SOAR$4,200.00/mo$50,000.00/yrMITRE-driven playbooks with AI triage and tier-1 plus tier-2 automation.
Smart SOAR Pro$8,500.00/mo$102,000.00/yrMulti-tenant with MSSP plans plus advanced reporting and governance.
Enterprise$14,600.00/mo$175,000.00/yrFull SOAR with dedicated infrastructure, SSO, dedicated CSM, and onboarding.

D3 Security is the MITRE-driven SOAR for SOC teams whose threat-detection model defaults to MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping as the primary classification. Founded 2002 in Vancouver, D3 built around the thesis that SOAR should ship with MITRE ATT&CK playbooks as out-of-the-box content rather than requiring SOC teams to author technique-specific playbooks themselves.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Smart SOAR covers MITRE-driven playbooks with AI triage and tier-1 plus tier-2 automation. Smart SOAR Pro covers multi-tenant with MSSP plans plus advanced reporting and governance. Enterprise opens the full SOAR with dedicated infrastructure, SSO, dedicated CSM, and onboarding.

The load-bearing wedge is MITRE ATT&CK content depth plus AI triage. Where Cortex XSOAR ships content packs as a marketplace and Splunk SOAR ships Phantom playbooks, D3 ships out-of-the-box MITRE-mapped playbooks where every detection event automatically maps to ATT&CK techniques; for SOCs whose detection engineering centers on MITRE ATT&CK, the alignment matters. The catch is the smaller integration ecosystem than Cortex XSOAR plus the smaller global brand recognition than the IBM, Splunk, and Palo Alto incumbents.

Pros

  • MITRE ATT&CK out-of-the-box playbooks with technique mapping
  • AI triage on Smart SOAR base tier
  • Multi-tenant with MSSP plans on Smart SOAR Pro
  • Strong Canadian SOC and MSSP reference base since 2002
  • Tier-1 plus tier-2 automation playbooks pre-built

Cons

  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Cortex XSOAR 800+ apps
  • Smaller global brand recognition than IBM, Splunk, and Palo Alto
Smart SOAR ~$50k/yrMITRE ATT&CK playbooksMSSP on ProDemo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: SOCs whose detection engineering centers on MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping with MSSP delivery models.

Audit posture
8
Playbook latency
8
Authoring overhead
8
Value
8
Support
7

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

We weight price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, and fit 15. Tines wins composite at 8.080 and brand recognition for modern SOAR; no editorial pinning for picks[0]. Cortex XSOAR pinned #2 from composite #4 for Palo Alto enterprise brand recognition. Splunk SOAR pinned #3 from composite #3 for Splunk-bundled audience. Torq composite #2 to picks[3] for hyperautomation niche.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best modern mainstream SOAR

Tines

Read the full review →

Best Palo Alto-bundled SOAR

Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR

Read the full review →

Best Splunk-bundled SOAR

Splunk SOAR

Read the full review →

Best hyperautomation SOAR

Torq

Read the full review →

Best IBM-bundled SOAR

IBM QRadar SOAR

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (second). Worth flagging the 800+ integration marketplace; Cortex XSOAR has the broadest content pack ecosystem in SOAR by a significant margin.

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the AI Analyst on Enterprise tier; Torq AI Analyst is the most aggressive AI-first SOAR positioning in the category.

Already in picks (sixth). Worth flagging the Resilient case management heritage; QRadar SOAR centers on case management as the primary primitive rather than playbook automation.

Already in picks (seventh). Worth flagging MITRE ATT&CK out-of-the-box playbooks; D3 ships technique-mapped playbooks rather than requiring SOC teams to author them.

How to choose your SOAR

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best SOAR' search covers seven distinct shapes. Modern dev-friendly mainstream (Tines) targets SOC engineers wanting story-based no-code SOAR with broad community. Enterprise Palo Alto (Cortex XSOAR) targets Fortune 500 SOCs with 50+ security tools and Palo Alto stacks. Splunk-bundled (Splunk SOAR) targets Splunk-already SOCs with Phantom muscle memory. Hyperautomation modern (Torq) targets SOCs whose automation extends into IT and DevOps. Low-code enterprise (Swimlane) targets enterprises needing custom security applications. Enterprise IBM (QRadar SOAR) targets IBM-already regulated-industry deployments. MITRE-driven (D3 Security) targets MITRE ATT&CK-centric detection engineering. The honest framework: identify your existing security stack, your automation scope, and your community-versus-enterprise preference.

Free Community tiers separate startup-friendly from enterprise-only

Free Community tiers separate the SOC-startup-friendly platforms from enterprise-contract-only. The cap landscape across the seven picks: Tines Community covers 3 stories and 1 user with unlimited actions. Cortex XSOAR Community Edition covers 100 incidents per day with full 800+ integrations. Splunk SOAR Community Edition covers 100 actions per day with 300+ integrations. Torq Community covers 100 workflow runs per month. Swimlane, QRadar SOAR, and D3 Security require enterprise contracts with no free tier. The honest framework: for SOC engineering teams under 5 people evaluating SOAR adoption, free Community tiers (Tines, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq) are the rational entry. Enterprise-contract-only platforms make sense once SOC headcount exceeds 10 and the procurement budget supports six-figure annual contracts.

Hyperautomation extends SOAR ROI beyond security

Hyperautomation is the dominant 2026 SOAR framing. Where 2019-era SOAR centered on security incident response automation, 2026 SOAR extends into IT operations, DevOps deployment workflows, and GRC compliance automation. Torq Pro and Swimlane Turbine Hyperautomation explicitly target cross-team automation; Tines Professional and Cortex XSOAR support hyperautomation but ship with security-first defaults. The honest framework: if your SOC automation roadmap extends beyond pure security incident response into IT ticketing, DevOps deployment gates, or GRC compliance workflows, hyperautomation-first platforms (Torq, Swimlane) match the use case better than security-only SOAR. For pure-security automation, dedicated SOAR (Tines, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR) is more focused and easier to deploy quickly.

2024 acquisitions and consolidations reshape the SOAR landscape

Three vendor moves closed in 2024 that reshape SOAR. Cisco acquired Splunk for $28 billion in March 2024, bundling Splunk SOAR into the broader Cisco SecureX strategy alongside Splunk Enterprise Security. Palo Alto Networks acquired the QRadar SaaS portion from IBM in August 2024 for $500 million; QRadar SOAR stays with IBM but the integration future between IBM SOAR and Palo Alto SIEM is uncertain. Gartner folded the Magic Quadrant for SOAR into the Magic Quadrant for SIEM in 2024, signaling that SOAR is increasingly evaluated as a SIEM-bundled feature rather than a standalone category. The honest framework: vendor strategy and roadmap visibility shifted across three of seven picks. Splunk SOAR buyers should evaluate Cisco SecureX bundle terms; QRadar SOAR buyers should check QRadar-Palo Alto integration timelines; standalone SOAR buyers should consider whether SIEM-bundled SOAR (Sentinel Logic Apps, Datadog) fits the use case.

Integration count drives total cost of automation

Integration count drives total cost of automation more than per-incident pricing. The integration landscape: Cortex XSOAR ships 800+ content packs, Splunk SOAR 300+, Swimlane 300+, Tines 200+, Torq 50+, IBM QRadar SOAR 180+, D3 Security under 200. The honest framework: every missing integration becomes either a custom-built API connector (engineering time) or a manual workflow (analyst time). For SOCs orchestrating 50+ security tools, Cortex XSOAR's 800+ marketplace covers virtually every tool out-of-the-box; for SOCs orchestrating 20-30 tools, Tines or Splunk SOAR cover most cases with smaller marketplaces. Below 20 tools, integration count matters less than authoring ergonomics. Plan for at least 6 weeks of custom-integration engineering for any SOAR platform; the official integration count is the floor, not the ceiling, of practical deployment.

When Tines wins versus Cortex XSOAR versus Splunk SOAR by stack

Tines versus Cortex XSOAR versus Splunk SOAR is the load-bearing decision for SOCs choosing SOAR in 2026. Tines wins when (1) the SOC values story-based no-code authoring with a low learning curve, (2) the integration count under 200 covers the use case, (3) Community Free tier supports proof-of-concept before enterprise procurement. Cortex XSOAR wins when (1) the security stack is Palo Alto Networks with 50+ tools to orchestrate, (2) the 800+ integration marketplace eliminates custom connector engineering, (3) XSIAM convergence aligns with the procurement strategy. Splunk SOAR wins when (1) the SOC has five-plus years of Phantom muscle memory, (2) Splunk Enterprise Security is already deployed for SIEM, (3) Cisco SecureX bundle aligns post-March-2024 acquisition. The honest framework: modern-no-code-first defaults to Tines; Palo Alto-stack-first defaults to Cortex XSOAR; Splunk-stack-first defaults to Splunk SOAR.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

SOAR pricing is custom-quoted for nearly all paid tiers; figures here are industry estimates as of May 2026. Expect 20-40 percent variance based on incident volume and negotiation leverage. Free Community tiers are stable: Tines (3 stories), Cortex XSOAR (100 incidents/day), Splunk SOAR (100 actions/day), Torq (100 workflow runs/mo). Tines Professional, Torq Pro, Splunk SOAR Standard, and Cortex XSOAR Standard are typical entry points. Get quotes from three vendors.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Tines ranked first instead of Cortex XSOAR or Splunk SOAR?

Tines leads brand recognition for modern SOAR with the broadest community adoption since 2018 and uniquely matches the best-modern-mainstream-soar tile. Tines also wins composite math via the cheapest paid tier (Professional ~$25k/yr) compared to Cortex XSOAR Standard ~$60k/yr and Splunk SOAR Standard ~$50k/yr. The head-term reader for "best SOAR" in 2026 is mostly an SOC engineer evaluating modern dev-friendly SOAR; legacy enterprise SOAR sits at #2 and #3 for that audience.

Should I pick Tines or Cortex XSOAR?

Pick by SOC scale and integration count. Modern SOC engineering teams under 10 people with under 30 security tools default to Tines for the story-based authoring and Community Free tier. Fortune 500 SOCs with 50+ tools to orchestrate and Palo Alto Networks security stack default to Cortex XSOAR for the 800+ integration marketplace. The decision tree: small-team-modern-stack defaults to Tines; large-team-Palo-Alto-stack defaults to Cortex XSOAR.

When does Splunk SOAR beat Tines or Cortex XSOAR?

When the SOC already runs Splunk Enterprise Security and has five-plus years of Phantom playbook investment. Splunk SOAR ships native SPL query integration inside playbooks; for Splunk-already analysts the operational lift of switching to Tines or Cortex XSOAR exceeds any pricing or feature advantage. The Cisco SecureX bundle on Enterprise tier post-March-2024 acquisition extends Splunk SOAR into the broader Cisco security stack for organizations already on Cisco networking.

Why aren't Microsoft Sentinel SOAR, ServiceNow Security Ops, or Sumo Logic Cloud SOAR in the picks?

Microsoft Sentinel SOAR (Logic Apps) is reasonable for M365 E5 customers with Sentinel deployed but is bundled into Sentinel rather than a standalone SOAR. ServiceNow Security Operations is reasonable for ServiceNow-already enterprises but SOC adoption is smaller than dedicated SOAR vendors. Sumo Logic Cloud SOAR (formerly DFLabs IncMan, acquired May 2022) bundles with Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM. All three are reasonable for specific stack-driven RFPs.

How did the 2024 acquisitions affect SOAR product roadmaps?

Cisco-Splunk March 2024 ($28B) bundles Splunk SOAR into Cisco SecureX strategy. Palo Alto-QRadar SaaS August 2024 ($500M) splits QRadar product line between IBM (SOAR + on-prem SIEM) and Palo Alto (cloud SIEM); QRadar SOAR-SIEM integration future is uncertain. Gartner folded SOAR Magic Quadrant into SIEM Magic Quadrant signaling SOAR is evaluated as a SIEM-bundled feature. Vendor roadmap visibility shifted across three of seven picks; check current vendor strategy before multi-year commitments.

How hard is it to switch SOAR vendors later?

Painful but not catastrophic. Migrating SOAR requires reauthoring playbooks in the new platform, rebuilding integrations to existing security tools, and retraining SOC analysts. Tines stories, Cortex XSOAR playbooks, Splunk SOAR Phantom playbooks, and Torq workflows all use different authoring models. The hardest part is the integration rebuild; every connector to existing security tools must be re-implemented. Plan three to six months of parallel-run.

When does SIEM-bundled SOAR beat standalone SOAR?

When the organization is already running a SIEM with native SOAR features (Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps, Splunk Mission Control with Splunk SOAR) and the integration depth between SIEM and SOAR matters more than authoring ergonomics. SIEM-bundled wins for tightly-integrated detection-to-response; standalone SOAR (Tines, Cortex XSOAR, Torq) wins for cross-SIEM portability and richer integration marketplaces. For most modern SOCs, the choice is not either-or.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes, Cisco-Splunk SecureX bundle pricing changes post-March-2024 acquisition, IBM QRadar SOAR roadmap changes after Palo Alto Aug-2024 acquisition split QRadar SaaS, Torq AI Analyst pricing transparency improvements, Gartner SOAR-into-SIEM Magic Quadrant evolution. The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the SOAR you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides