Relay.app
8.7/10Save $492/yrBest no-code human-in-loop, hybrid AI plus approval gates
Hybrid AI plus human approval; 50+ integrations; Tiger Global and Khosla Ventures funded.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Relay.app free tier with 200 workflow steps per month and 50+ integrations |
| Professional | $9.00/mo | $108.00/yr | Relay.app professional tier per user with 5K steps and premium AI models |
| Team | $29.00/mo | $348.00/yr | Mid Relay.app tier per user with 25K steps and shared workflows plus roles |
| Enterprise | $100.00/mo | $1,200.00/yr | Premium Relay.app tier with unlimited steps plus SSO and dedicated CSM |
Relay.app is the hybrid AI no-code pick that blends AI steps with human-in-the-loop approval gates. Founded 2022 in San Francisco and backed by Tiger Global and Khosla Ventures. Around 50,000-plus users by Q4 2024. The wedge: Relay.app explicitly designs for workflows where some steps require human review before continuing, differentiating from autonomous-only platforms.
Free ships 200 workflow steps per month plus 50-plus integrations plus AI and human-in-loop steps. Professional is the upgrade tier at nine dollars per user monthly with five thousand steps and premium AI models. Team adds 25K steps plus shared workflows and audit logs. Enterprise covers unlimited steps plus SSO and dedicated CSM. Per-user pricing scales linearly with team size.
The trade-off versus Lindy is autonomous-only versus approval-gated; Relay.app is intentionally human-supervised. The trade-off versus Stack AI is workflow flexibility; Relay.app's approval-gate design constrains workflow shape. For no-code readers running business processes requiring human oversight, Relay.app fits cleanest.
Pros
- Around 50K+ users by Q4 2024 (specialist human-in-loop community)
- Hybrid AI steps plus human approval gates
- 50+ integrations on Free tier
- Per-user pricing on Pro at nine dollars per user monthly
- Tiger Global and Khosla Ventures funded; founded 2022
Cons
- Per-user pricing scales linearly with team size
- Approval-gate design constrains workflow shape versus autonomous platforms
Best for: No-code readers running business processes requiring human oversight on AI workflow steps and accept per-user pricing as the trade-off for human-in-loop design.
- Builder ease
- 8
- Integration breadth
- 7
- Self-hosting
- 8
- Value
- 9
- Support
- 7