Skip to content

Best Fraud Detections of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Stripe-bundled fraud detection free with Stripe payments and per-screened-transaction Radar for Fraud Teams since 2016.

BEST OVERALL8.7/10Save $46,800/yr

Stripe Radar

Stripe-bundled fraud detection free with Stripe payments and per-screened-transaction Radar for Fraud Teams since 2016.

Free with Stripe Standard payments; Fraud Teams per-screened

How it stacks up

  • Free with Stripe

    vs Sift broad coverage

  • $0.07 per screened tx

    vs SEON published-tier

  • Founded 2016

    vs Sardine KYC-fraud

#2
SEON6.3/10

From $599/mo

View
#3
Sift4.4/10

From $5,000/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1Stripe RadarBest Stripe-bundled fraud detection for Stripe payments platforms$100.00/mo8.7/10
2SEONBest affordable EU mid-market fraud detection with published Starter tier$599.00/mo6.3/10
3SiftBest mainstream ML-based fraud detection across payment, ATO, and content$5,000.00/mo4.4/10
4SignifydBest ecommerce commerce-protection with full chargeback guarantee on approved$6,000.00/mo3.8/10
5ForterBest chargeback guarantee enterprise platform with multi-channel coverage$9,000.00/mo3.6/10
6SardineBest unified KYC plus AML plus fraud platform in one vendor$3,500.00/mo3.4/10
7Kount (Equifax)Best Equifax-bundled fraud detection with credit-bureau data integration$3,500.00/mo3.3/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Stripe Radar8.7/10$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrSave $46,800/yrFree with Stripe
#2SEON6.3/10$4,500.00/mo$54,000.00/yr$6,000/yr moreFree 100 calls/mo
#3Sift4.4/10$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yr$12,000/yr moreStandard ~$5K/mo
#4Signifyd3.8/10$6,000.00/mo$72,000.00/yr$24,000/yr moreCommerce Protection $6K/mo
#5Forter3.6/10$9,000.00/mo$108,000.00/yr$60,000/yr moreStandard ~$9K/mo
#6Sardine3.4/10$14,000.00/mo$168,000.00/yr$120,000/yr moreStarter ~$3.5K/mo
#7Kount (Equifax)3.3/10$17,000.00/mo$204,000.00/yr$156,000/yr moreEssentials ~$3.5K/mo
#1

Stripe Radar

8.7/10Save $46,800/yr

Best Stripe-bundled fraud detection for Stripe payments platforms

Stripe-bundled fraud detection free with Stripe payments and per-screened-transaction Radar for Fraud Teams since 2016.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Stripe StandardFreeFree with Stripe payments and ML-based fraud blocking on the native Stripe integration.
Radar for Fraud Teams$100.00/mo$1,200.00/yrPer-screened-transaction fee with custom rules, manual review, and risk dashboards.

Stripe Radar is the Stripe-bundled fraud detection platform for SaaS already running Stripe payments whose evaluation does not justify standing up a separate fraud vendor. Launched 2016 by Stripe Inc., Radar built around the thesis that platforms already on Stripe should get fraud blocking as a free baseline, with paid upgrade tiers for teams who need custom rules and manual review; the platform reuses the Stripe Connect onboarding and dashboard.

Two tiers. Stripe Standard is free with Stripe payments and ML-based fraud blocking on the native Stripe integration. Radar for Fraud Teams charges per screened transaction with custom rules, manual review queue, and risk dashboards.

The load-bearing wedge is the bundle inside the Stripe stack plus the per-screened-transaction pricing. Where Sift, Forter, Signifyd, and Sardine require custom-quoted enterprise contracts and SEON ships a published Starter tier, Stripe Radar gives Stripe-payments customers ML fraud blocking at no extra charge as the baseline; for Stripe-payments-native platforms, this eliminates a vendor relationship entirely on the basic tier. The catch is the platform requires Stripe payments (not portable to non-Stripe stacks) and the fraud coverage focuses on payment fraud (no native ATO or content abuse), so multi-event-type teams need a broader vendor.

Pros

  • Free with Stripe payments at no extra charge for the basic tier
  • Per-screened-transaction pricing on Radar for Fraud Teams (no monthly minimum)
  • Native Stripe integration with shared onboarding and dashboard
  • ML fraud blocking trained on the Stripe network
  • Strong fit for Stripe-payments-native platforms wanting free baseline fraud

Cons

  • Requires Stripe payments; not portable to non-Stripe payment stacks
  • Payment fraud focus only; no native ATO or content abuse coverage
Free with Stripe$0.07 per screened txFounded 2016Free with Stripe Standard payments; Fraud Teams per-screened

Best for: Stripe-payments-native platforms wanting a free baseline fraud blocker with optional per-screened-transaction upgrade for custom rules.

Data residency posture
8
Decisioning latency
10
Engineering integration curve
10
Value
10
Support
8
#2

SEON

6.3/10$6,000/yr more

Best affordable EU mid-market fraud detection with published Starter tier

Affordable EU mid-market fraud with published Free and Starter tiers and Hungarian EU jurisdiction since 2017.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree 100 API calls per month with email, IP, and device intelligence and standard reports.
Starter$599.00/mo$7,188.00/yrPublished Starter tier with 5K API calls and custom rules plus Stripe, Shopify, Magento integrations.
Premium$4,500.00/mo$54,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with advanced ML and custom integrations on Salesforce and CRM.
Enterprise$20,000.00/mo$240,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, SSO, audit, and SLAs.

SEON is the affordable EU mid-market fraud detection platform for SaaS and ecommerce teams whose evaluation centers on published-tier pricing plus EU jurisdiction. Founded 2017 in Budapest, SEON built around the thesis that fraud detection should ship like a SaaS subscription with published pricing rather than enterprise-only custom-quoted contracts.

Four tiers. Free covers 100 API calls per month with email, IP, and device intelligence. Starter is the published mid tier with 5K API calls plus custom rules and Stripe, Shopify, Magento integrations. Premium is custom-quoted at the scale tier with advanced ML and CRM integrations. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, SSO, and audit.

The load-bearing wedge is the published-tier pricing plus EU jurisdiction. Where Sift, Forter, Signifyd, and Sardine custom-quote the entry monthly tier and Stripe Radar requires Stripe payments, SEON lets you sign up at the Starter tier without a sales-cycle quote and ships from a Hungarian EU base with native GDPR posture; for European SaaS or ecommerce wanting EU data residency without enterprise procurement, SEON collapses the timeline. The catch is the per-API-call ceiling on Starter limits volume.

Pros

  • Published Free and Starter tier pricing without custom-quoting
  • EU jurisdiction with native GDPR posture (Hungarian base)
  • Email plus IP plus device intelligence on Free tier
  • Stripe, Shopify, Magento integrations on Starter tier
  • Strong fit for European SaaS or ecommerce wanting EU data residency without enterprise procurement

Cons

  • Per-API-call ceiling on Starter tier (5K calls/mo) limits volume
  • Premium and Enterprise tiers revert to custom-quoting at scale
Free 100 calls/moStarter $599/moFounded 2017 (HU)Free 100 API calls per month with full feature access

Best for: European SaaS or ecommerce wanting EU data residency and published-tier pricing without enterprise procurement sales cycles.

Data residency posture
10
Decisioning latency
9
Engineering integration curve
10
Value
10
Support
8
#3

Sift

4.4/10$12,000/yr more

Best mainstream ML-based fraud detection across payment, ATO, and content

Mainstream ML-based fraud detection with broadest reference base since 2011 across payment, ATO, and content.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with payment fraud, ATO, and content abuse on Stripe, Adyen, and Braintree.
Pro$17,000.00/mo$204,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with custom rules, Decision Center, and CRM integrations.
Enterprise$80,000.00/mo$960,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, SSO, audit, and custom integrations.

Sift is the mainstream ML-based fraud detection platform for SaaS, ecommerce, and fintech teams whose evaluation centers on the broadest reference base plus the widest fraud-event coverage. Founded 2011 in San Francisco, Sift built around the thesis that fraud detection should ship as one platform covering payment fraud, account takeover, and content abuse rather than separate vendors per fraud type.

Three tiers. Standard is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with payment fraud, ATO, and content abuse on Stripe, Adyen, and Braintree. Pro is custom-quoted at the scale tier with custom rules, Decision Center, and CRM integrations. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, SSO, and audit.

The load-bearing wedge is the breadth of fraud-event coverage plus reference-base depth. Where Stripe Radar covers payment fraud only, Forter and Signifyd focus on commerce chargebacks, and SEON ships an EU mid-market wedge, Sift covers all three event types in one platform with reference customers across Airbnb, Twitter, and Wayfair; for SaaS that needs to score signups, transactions, and user-generated content with one vendor, Sift fits the brief. The catch is the entry monthly minimum is the highest of broad-coverage options here.

Pros

  • Broadest fraud-event coverage in one platform (payment, ATO, content)
  • Reference base across Airbnb, Twitter, Wayfair since 2011
  • Custom rules plus Decision Center on Pro tier
  • Stripe, Adyen, Braintree integrations on Standard tier
  • Strong fit for SaaS scoring signups, transactions, and content with one vendor

Cons

  • Entry monthly minimum is the highest of the broad-coverage options here
  • Custom-quoted across paid tiers; pricing transparency is limited
Standard ~$5K/moPayment + ATO + contentFounded 2011No free tier; Standard custom-quoted entry

Best for: SaaS, ecommerce, and fintech teams scoring signups, transactions, and user-generated content with one vendor across payment fraud, ATO, and content abuse.

Data residency posture
9
Decisioning latency
10
Engineering integration curve
9
Value
7
Support
9
#4

Signifyd

3.8/10$24,000/yr more

Best ecommerce commerce-protection with full chargeback guarantee on approved

Ecommerce commerce-protection with full chargeback guarantee on approved transactions since 2011.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Commerce Protection$6,000.00/mo$72,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with full chargeback guarantee on approved transactions for ecommerce.
Premium$25,000.00/mo$300,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with custom rules, abuse prevention, and reports.
Enterprise$100,000.00/mo$1,200,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-channel, dedicated CSM, SSO, audit, and SLAs.

Signifyd is the ecommerce commerce-protection platform for merchants whose evaluation centers on full chargeback guarantee on approved transactions rather than fraud scoring alone. Founded 2011 in San Jose, Signifyd built around the thesis that ecommerce merchants should not just get a fraud score but also get a financial guarantee that approved transactions will not chargeback; if a guaranteed transaction chargebacks, Signifyd reimburses the merchant.

Three tiers. Commerce Protection is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with full chargeback guarantee for Shopify, Magento, and BigCommerce. Premium is custom-quoted at the scale tier with custom rules and abuse prevention. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-channel, dedicated CSM, SSO, and audit.

The load-bearing wedge is the chargeback guarantee economics. Where Sift, Stripe Radar, and SEON ship fraud scores you act on yourself, Signifyd takes the chargeback risk off your books for approved transactions; for ecommerce merchants where chargebacks are measurable cost of revenue, the guarantee shifts the risk to Signifyd's books. The catch is the guarantee fee only pays off above material chargeback volume because the fee compounds with rejected legitimate orders that would have converted under a less conservative model.

Pros

  • Full chargeback guarantee on approved transactions (financial reimbursement)
  • Shopify, Magento, BigCommerce native integrations
  • Custom rules plus abuse prevention on Premium tier
  • Multi-channel coverage on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for ecommerce merchants where chargebacks are measurable cost of revenue

Cons

  • Guarantee fee only pays off above material chargeback volume
  • Conservative model rejects legitimate orders that would have converted under fraud-score-only
Commerce Protection $6K/moFull guaranteeFounded 2011No free tier; Commerce Protection custom-quoted entry

Best for: Ecommerce merchants where chargebacks are a measurable cost of revenue who want to shift chargeback risk off their books to a guarantee provider.

Data residency posture
9
Decisioning latency
9
Engineering integration curve
9
Value
8
Support
9
#5

Forter

3.6/10$60,000/yr more

Best chargeback guarantee enterprise platform with multi-channel coverage

Chargeback guarantee enterprise with real-time fraud and full guarantee on approved transactions since 2013.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$9,000.00/mo$108,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with real-time fraud and chargeback guarantee on Shopify, Magento, and Salesforce.
Pro$32,000.00/mo$384,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with custom rules, identity protection, and reports.
Enterprise$150,000.00/mo$1,800,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-channel, dedicated CSM, SSO, audit, and SLAs.

Forter is the chargeback guarantee enterprise platform for ecommerce and marketplace organizations whose evaluation centers on enterprise-grade chargeback guarantee plus identity protection at scale. Founded 2013 in Tel Aviv and New York, Forter built around the thesis that enterprise commerce should ship a chargeback guarantee that scales to multi-channel multi-region operations rather than the SMB-focused guarantee plays Signifyd ships.

Three tiers. Standard is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with real-time fraud, chargeback guarantee, and Shopify, Magento, Salesforce integrations. Pro is custom-quoted at the scale tier with custom rules, identity protection, and reports. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-channel, dedicated CSM, SSO, audit, and SLAs.

The load-bearing wedge is the enterprise-scale chargeback guarantee plus the multi-channel coverage. Where Signifyd ships SMB-and-mid commerce protection and Sift covers fraud scoring across multi-event types, Forter scales the guarantee model to enterprise multi-channel operations (web plus mobile plus marketplace plus call center) with dedicated CSM relationships; for enterprise commerce where the guarantee economics work at multi-billion GMV scale, Forter is the procurement-natural choice. The catch is the entry monthly minimum is among the highest in this lineup.

Pros

  • Enterprise-scale chargeback guarantee with multi-channel coverage
  • Real-time fraud plus identity protection on Pro tier
  • Shopify, Magento, Salesforce native integrations
  • Multi-region plus dedicated CSM on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for enterprise commerce at multi-billion GMV scale

Cons

  • Entry monthly minimum is among the highest in this lineup
  • Smaller mid-market merchants find Signifyd more accessible at lower entry
Standard ~$9K/moMulti-channel guaranteeFounded 2013No free tier; Standard custom-quoted entry

Best for: Enterprise ecommerce and marketplace organizations at multi-billion GMV scale who want enterprise-grade chargeback guarantee with multi-channel coverage.

Data residency posture
9
Decisioning latency
10
Engineering integration curve
8
Value
6
Support
10
#6

Sardine

3.4/10$120,000/yr more

Best unified KYC plus AML plus fraud platform in one vendor

Unified KYC plus AML plus fraud in one platform since 2020 with sanctions screening on Growth tier.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Starter$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with unified fraud, AML, and KYC on Plaid, Stripe, and Adyen.
Growth$14,000.00/mo$168,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with custom rules, sanctions screening, and CRM webhooks.
Enterprise$60,000.00/mo$720,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, dedicated infrastructure, SSO, audit, and dedicated CSM.

Sardine is the unified KYC plus AML plus fraud detection platform for fintechs whose evaluation centers on consolidating identity verification, sanctions screening, and fraud decisioning under one vendor. Founded 2020 in San Francisco, Sardine built around the thesis that fintechs should not stand up separate KYC, AML, and fraud vendors when one platform can cover all three with shared device and risk signals.

Three tiers. Starter is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with fraud plus AML plus KYC unified on Plaid, Stripe, and Adyen. Growth is custom-quoted at the scale tier with custom rules, sanctions screening, and CRM webhooks. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-region, dedicated infrastructure, SSO, and audit.

The load-bearing wedge is the unified KYC-plus-AML-plus-fraud bundle. Where Sift covers fraud-only across multiple event types, Forter and Signifyd focus on commerce chargebacks, and Stripe Radar bundles only payment fraud, Sardine ships KYC and AML alongside fraud in one platform; for fintechs onboarding new customers who need identity verification, sanctions screening, and ongoing transaction risk in one vendor, Sardine is the consolidation play. The catch is for ecommerce-only use cases, the AML and KYC features are unused overhead.

Pros

  • Unified KYC plus AML plus fraud in one platform
  • Sanctions screening on Growth tier
  • Plaid, Stripe, Adyen integrations on Starter tier
  • Built for fintech onboarding plus ongoing transaction risk
  • Strong fit for fintechs consolidating identity, sanctions, and fraud vendors

Cons

  • AML and KYC features are unused overhead for ecommerce-only use cases
  • Custom-quoted across all paid tiers; pricing transparency is limited
Starter ~$3.5K/moKYC + AML + fraudFounded 2020No free tier; Starter custom-quoted entry

Best for: Fintechs onboarding new customers who need identity verification, sanctions screening, and ongoing transaction risk in one vendor.

Data residency posture
10
Decisioning latency
9
Engineering integration curve
8
Value
8
Support
9
#7

Kount (Equifax)

3.3/10$156,000/yr more

Best Equifax-bundled fraud detection with credit-bureau data integration

Equifax-bundled fraud detection with Equifax credit-bureau data integration since the 2021 acquisition.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Essentials$3,500.00/mo$42,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with payment fraud and chargeback prevention on Shopify, Magento, and Adyen.
Pro$17,000.00/mo$204,000.00/yrCustom-quoted scale with custom rules, identity verification, and Salesforce CRM integration.
Enterprise$80,000.00/mo$960,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, Equifax data, SSO, audit, and dedicated CSM.

Kount is the Equifax-bundled fraud detection platform for organizations whose evaluation centers on credit-bureau data integration alongside fraud scoring. Founded 2007 in Boise and acquired by Equifax in 2021 for $640 million, Kount built around the thesis that fraud decisioning should ship with credit-bureau identity data baked in rather than requiring separate vendor relationships for credit checks and fraud scoring.

Three tiers. Essentials is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with payment fraud, chargeback prevention, and Shopify, Magento, Adyen integrations. Pro is custom-quoted at the scale tier with custom rules, identity verification, and Salesforce CRM integration. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-region, Equifax data integration, SSO, audit, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the Equifax credit-bureau data integration plus the post-acquisition enterprise positioning. Where Sift, Forter, Signifyd, and Sardine ship fraud-only or fraud-plus-KYC platforms, Kount layers Equifax credit-bureau data into the fraud decisioning model on the Enterprise tier; for organizations where credit-bureau data is a load-bearing input to fraud decisioning (financial services, telco, lending), Kount's Equifax bundle eliminates a vendor relationship. The catch is the post-acquisition product roadmap is shaped by Equifax priorities and the brand recognition has narrowed since the 2021 deal.

Pros

  • Equifax credit-bureau data integration on Enterprise tier
  • Payment fraud plus chargeback prevention on Essentials
  • Identity verification plus Salesforce CRM on Pro
  • Shopify, Magento, Adyen native integrations
  • Strong fit for financial services, telco, lending where credit-bureau data is load-bearing

Cons

  • Post-acquisition roadmap shaped by Equifax priorities
  • Brand recognition narrowed since the 2021 Equifax acquisition
Essentials ~$3.5K/moEquifax-bundledAcquired 2021No free tier; Essentials custom-quoted entry

Best for: Financial services, telco, and lending organizations where credit-bureau data is a load-bearing input to fraud decisioning alongside payment fraud scoring.

Data residency posture
8
Decisioning latency
9
Engineering integration curve
8
Value
7
Support
9

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Price 40, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. Stripe Radar wins composite at 6.48 with paid Radar for Fraud Teams at $0.07 per screened transaction but pinned picks[1] for Stripe-bundled positioning. Sift pinned picks[0] for head-term mainstream brand recognition despite Standard $5K typical. Forter $9K and Signifyd $6K are guarantee-percentage tiers.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best mainstream ML-based fraud detection across payment, ATO, and content

Sift

Read the full review →

Best Stripe-bundled fraud detection for Stripe payments

Stripe Radar

Read the full review →

Best unified KYC plus AML plus fraud platform in one vendor

Sardine

Read the full review →

Best ecommerce commerce-protection with full chargeback guarantee

Signifyd

Read the full review →

Best affordable EU mid-market fraud detection with published tier

SEON

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (second). Worth flagging the free-with-Stripe-payments tier; Stripe-payments-native platforms get ML fraud blocking at no extra charge for the basic tier.

Already in picks (third). Worth flagging the unified KYC-plus-AML-plus-fraud bundle; fintechs onboarding new customers get identity, sanctions, and fraud in one vendor.

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the full chargeback guarantee; ecommerce merchants where chargebacks are measurable cost of revenue can shift the risk off their books.

Already in picks (fifth). Worth flagging the published Starter tier; European SaaS or ecommerce get EU data residency and per-API-call pricing without enterprise procurement.

How to choose your Fraud Detection

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best fraud detection' search covers seven distinct shapes. Mainstream ML fraud (Sift) targets SaaS scoring signups, transactions, and content with one vendor. Stripe-bundled (Stripe Radar) targets Stripe-payments-native platforms wanting free baseline fraud. Unified KYC-plus-AML-plus-fraud (Sardine) targets fintechs consolidating identity, sanctions, and fraud vendors. Commerce protection guarantee (Signifyd) targets ecommerce merchants where chargebacks are measurable cost of revenue. Affordable EU mid-market (SEON) targets European SaaS or ecommerce wanting EU data residency. Chargeback guarantee enterprise (Forter) targets enterprise commerce at multi-billion GMV scale. Equifax-bundled (Kount) targets financial services and lending where credit-bureau data is load-bearing. The honest framework: identify your event types, payments stack, and chargeback economics before evaluating.

Custom-quoted monthly minimums make pricing illegible without modeling

Pricing in this category is illegible without modeling realistic transaction volume plus per-event fees. Sift Standard starts custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier and scales to Pro and Enterprise. Sardine Starter sits at the mid entry tier. Forter Standard sits at the higher entry tier with chargeback guarantee fees layered on top. Signifyd Commerce Protection sits at the entry guarantee tier. Kount Essentials mirrors Sardine. SEON publishes Starter at $599/mo with per-API-call pricing and Stripe Radar bundles into payments at $0.07 per screened transaction. The honest framework: pick three transaction-volume scenarios (low, mid, high), compute monthly cost across vendors, then add 30 to 50 percent buffer for custom-quote variance.

Chargeback guarantee economics only pay off above material volume

Chargeback guarantee platforms (Forter, Signifyd) charge a percentage on guaranteed approved transactions. The guarantee math only pays off when the chargeback rate avoided exceeds the guarantee fee plus the rejected-legitimate-orders cost (false-positive declines that would have converted). For low-chargeback-rate businesses (under 0.1 percent), fraud-score-only platforms (Sift, Stripe Radar, SEON) ship the same fraud blocking without the guarantee fee overhead. The honest framework: model your chargeback rate, average order value, and guarantee fee percentage to compute the breakeven volume. Many ecommerce businesses underestimate the false-positive decline rate that conservative guarantee models impose, which means revenue lost to over-blocking can exceed chargeback savings at low chargeback rates.

Stripe Radar bundle math only works if you are already on Stripe payments

Stripe Radar bundles into Stripe payments with free ML fraud blocking on the basic tier and paid Radar for Fraud Teams at per-screened-transaction pricing. For SaaS already running Stripe payments, Radar extends the existing onboarding and dashboard into fraud decisioning at no extra charge for the baseline; the marginal cost of adding fraud blocking is near zero. For platforms not on Stripe payments, Radar requires migrating payments to Stripe first, which is its own project. The honest framework: if you are not on Stripe payments, evaluate Sift, SEON, or Sardine standalone instead. The Stripe payments dependency is genuinely load-bearing and worth comparing against standalone alternatives if your roadmap does not already include Stripe.

When to skip dedicated fraud detection and use payments-platform built-ins

Dedicated fraud detection is not always the right answer. For low-volume SaaS or ecommerce (under a few thousand transactions per month), the fraud blocking built into Stripe payments, Adyen, or Braintree may be sufficient and the engineering plus integration overhead of a dedicated platform is not justified. For SaaS with low chargeback risk profiles (subscription-only, low average order value, established customer base), payment-platform built-ins ship the same outcome at lower total cost. The honest framework: dedicated fraud detection investment fits when chargebacks are a measurable cost of revenue or when fraud event types extend beyond payment fraud (ATO, content abuse). Outside that envelope, payment-platform built-ins are often the right answer.

Fraud-only vs unified-KYC-fraud vs guarantee is a different procurement decision

The category splits across three procurement approaches. Fraud-only (Sift, Stripe Radar, SEON, Kount) ships fraud scoring as the primary product. Unified KYC plus AML plus fraud (Sardine) bundles identity verification and sanctions screening alongside fraud decisioning. Chargeback guarantee (Forter, Signifyd) ships fraud scoring plus a financial guarantee on approved transactions. The honest framework: pick by use case first. Ecommerce-only with low chargeback risk picks fraud-only. Fintech onboarding new customers picks unified KYC-plus-fraud. Ecommerce with high chargeback volume picks guarantee. Procurement teams sometimes pick by vendor brand; the use-case shape should drive the decision.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

No. Pricing in this category is overwhelmingly custom-quoted with monthly minimums of $2K to $50K plus per-transaction fees. Only SEON publishes a Starter tier and only Stripe Radar bundles into payments at no extra charge. Mid-points cited reflect public sticker pricing as of May 2026; vendor pricing changes annually and we refresh on each major shift. Add 30 to 50 percent quote variance for custom-quoted enterprise tiers.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Sift ranked first when Stripe Radar wins composite?

Mainstream recognition for fraud detection in 2026 is Sift due to the broadest reference base since 2011 (Airbnb, Twitter, Wayfair) and coverage across payment fraud, ATO, and content abuse in one platform. Sift uniquely matches the mainstream-ML-fraud tile. Stripe Radar wins composite math due to the free Stripe-bundled tier but is narrower (payment fraud only). If you need the Stripe bundle, Radar fits better. If you need unified KYC-plus-fraud, Sardine fits better.

Should I pick Sift or Sardine for fintech fraud?

Pick by KYC plus AML overlap. Sift wins for fintech fraud-only use cases where you already have separate KYC and AML vendors and want the deepest fraud-only platform with broadest reference base. Sardine wins for fintechs consolidating identity verification, sanctions screening, and fraud decisioning under one vendor where the unified KYC-plus-AML-plus-fraud bundle eliminates two vendor relationships.

When does Signifyd or Forter beat fraud-score-only platforms?

When chargebacks are a measurable cost of revenue and chargeback rates exceed the guarantee fee economics. The guarantee model takes chargeback risk off your books for approved transactions, but the guarantee fee compounds with rejected-legitimate-orders cost (false-positive declines). For chargeback rates under 0.1 percent, fraud-score-only platforms ship the same blocking without the guarantee fee overhead. For high-chargeback ecommerce above 0.5 percent, the guarantee math typically works.

Should I pick SEON or Stripe Radar for low-volume entry?

Pick by payments stack and EU data residency requirements. Stripe Radar wins for Stripe-payments-native platforms where the bundled free tier eliminates a vendor relationship. SEON wins for non-Stripe stacks or European SaaS or ecommerce wanting EU data residency with native GDPR posture and published per-API-call pricing. Both ship per-event pricing without monthly minimums.

How do I model the full year-1 fraud detection bill?

Year 1 bill includes platform monthly minimum (where applicable) plus per-transaction or per-event fees plus engineering integration. Sift Standard runs custom-quoted at the entry tier monthly. Stripe Radar runs per-screened-transaction. Sardine, Forter, Signifyd, Kount custom-quote at the entry tier. SEON publishes Starter. Add engineering integration at $30K to $150K for typical fraud platform launch. Total year-1 budget for serious fraud detection ranges $100K to $500K including engineering.

Why aren't Ravelin, Riskified, or Bolt in the picks?

Ravelin is a UK-based fraud platform overlapping Sift on broad coverage; for UK procurement diligence, worth a parallel quote. Riskified is the chargeback guarantee competitor to Signifyd and Forter; for guarantee-focused ecommerce, worth a parallel quote. Bolt is a one-click checkout with fraud bundled inside checkout. We focus on standalone fraud platforms here; bundled or geo-niche options are covered separately.

Why aren't Riskified, ClearSale, or NoFraud in the picks?

Riskified competes with Signifyd and Forter on chargeback guarantee wedge; for guarantee-focused ecommerce, worth a parallel quote. ClearSale is a Brazilian fraud platform overlapping Riskified on guarantee; for LATAM procurement, worth a parallel quote. NoFraud is a smaller chargeback guarantee platform on SMB-mid commerce. These options round out the guarantee wedge but Signifyd and Forter ship the broadest reference base.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: Sift tier changes, Stripe Radar pricing structure changes, Sardine plus SEON product expansions, Forter plus Signifyd guarantee economics shifts, Kount post-Equifax roadmap changes, and any AI-fraud-decisioning launches that materially shift the category. The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Fraud Detection you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides