Skip to content

Best Fintech Card Issuings of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners and card, account, and ledger primitives since 2020.

BEST OVERALL8.7/10Save $48,000/yr

Highnote

GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners and card, account, and ledger primitives since 2020.

Free Sandbox with full GraphQL API access

How it stacks up

  • Free sandbox

    vs Marqeta REST

  • GraphQL API

    vs Lithic single-BIN

  • Founded 2020

    vs Stripe Connect

#2
Lithic8.6/10

From $500/mo

View
#3
Stripe Issuing8.2/10

From $1,800/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1HighnoteBest GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners$1,000.00/mo8.7/10
2LithicBest API-first developer card issuing with no monthly minimum on entry$500.00/mo8.6/10
3Stripe IssuingBest Stripe-bundled card issuing for Stripe Connect platforms$1,800.00/mo8.2/10
4Apto PaymentsBest Marqeta-owned Open Platform card issuing for SMB-and-mid builders$5,000.00/mo5.8/10
5Adyen IssuingBest payments-bundled European card issuing inside Adyen processing$5,500.00/mo4.5/10
6MarqetaBest enterprise network card issuer with broadest fintech reference base$8,000.00/mo4.1/10
7Galileo Financial TechnologiesBest legacy processor network card issuing with SoFi-owned platform$15,000.00/mo3.6/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Highnote8.7/10$1,000.00/mo$12,000.00/yrSave $48,000/yrFree sandbox
#2Lithic8.6/10$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yrSave $54,000/yrFree sandbox
#3Stripe Issuing8.2/10$1,800.00/mo$21,600.00/yrSave $38,400/yrFree in test
#4Apto Payments5.8/10$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrFree sandbox
#5Adyen Issuing4.5/10$5,500.00/mo$66,000.00/yr$6,000/yr moreStandard ~$5.5K/mo
#6Marqeta4.1/10$8,000.00/mo$96,000.00/yr$36,000/yr moreFree sandbox
#7Galileo Financial Technologies3.6/10$15,000.00/mo$180,000.00/yr$120,000/yr moreStandard ~$15K/mo
#1

Highnote

8.7/10Save $48,000/yr

Best GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners

GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners and card, account, and ledger primitives since 2020.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
SandboxFreeFree sandbox with GraphQL API and card, account, and ledger primitives.
Production$1,000.00/mo$12,000.00/yrPay-per-card and per-transaction with no minimum on entry and multiple BIN partners.
Enterprise$8,000.00/mo$96,000.00/yrCustom contract with dedicated CSM, custom programs, PCI compliance, and audit.

Highnote is the GraphQL-modern card-issuing platform for engineering teams whose evaluation centers on GraphQL primitives plus multiple BIN partner choice. Founded 2020 by ex-Braintree leadership, Highnote built around the thesis that modern card-issuing should ship as a GraphQL API with composable card, account, and ledger primitives rather than the REST endpoints that Marqeta and Galileo built around.

Three tiers. Sandbox is free with GraphQL API plus card, account, and ledger primitives. Production runs pay-per-card and per-transaction with no minimum on entry and access to multiple BIN partners. Enterprise is custom contract with dedicated CSM, custom programs, PCI compliance, and audit.

The load-bearing wedge is the GraphQL API design plus the multiple BIN partner choice. Where Marqeta locks you to its single BIN and Stripe Issuing routes through its bank partners, Highnote lets builders pick across multiple BIN partners which matters for diversifying bank-of-record concentration; for engineering teams whose evaluation includes both API ergonomics and BIN-partner diversification, Highnote is the modern option. The catch is the brand recognition is narrower than Marqeta and the multiple-BIN-partner model adds a procurement choice that single-BIN platforms simplify away.

Pros

  • GraphQL API with card, account, and ledger primitives
  • Multiple BIN partners for bank-of-record diversification
  • Pay-per-card and per-transaction with no minimum on entry
  • Built by ex-Braintree leadership with payments-platform experience
  • Strong fit for engineering teams wanting GraphQL plus BIN diversification

Cons

  • Narrower brand recognition than Marqeta
  • Multiple-BIN-partner model adds procurement complexity vs single-BIN
Free sandboxGraphQL APIFounded 2020Free Sandbox with full GraphQL API access

Best for: Engineering teams whose evaluation includes both GraphQL API ergonomics and bank-of-record diversification across multiple BIN partners.

BIN-partner diligence
9
Card-issuance latency
10
Builder onboarding curve
9
Value
9
Support
8
#2

Lithic

8.6/10Save $54,000/yr

Best API-first developer card issuing with no monthly minimum on entry

API-first developer card issuing with no monthly minimum on Production, formerly Privacy.com B2B.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
SandboxFreeFree sandbox with virtual and physical cards and JIT plus ACH funding.
Production$500.00/mo$6,000.00/yrPay-per-card and per-transaction with no platform minimum on entry.
Enterprise$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrCustom contract with volume discounts, dedicated BIN, and PCI compliance.

Lithic is the API-first developer card-issuing platform for builders whose evaluation centers on no monthly minimum plus pay-per-card pricing. Founded 2014 (originally Privacy.com B2B before the 2021 spin-out), Lithic built around the thesis that card-issuing should price like an API (pay-per-card and per-transaction) rather than like an enterprise contract; for low-volume builders who do not yet justify a $5K monthly retainer, Lithic removes the floor.

Three tiers. Sandbox is free with virtual and physical cards and JIT plus ACH funding. Production runs pay-per-card and per-transaction with no platform minimum on entry. Enterprise is custom contract with volume discounts, dedicated BIN, PCI compliance, and custom programs.

The load-bearing wedge is the no-monthly-minimum entry plus the API-first developer experience. Where Marqeta, Adyen, and Galileo all carry $5K to $15K monthly minimums, Lithic lets you ship a card program before you have product-market fit; for indie builders or pre-seed startups, Lithic is the cheapest path to validating a card workflow. The catch is the per-card pricing scales with volume rather than flattening on a custom contract, and the brand recognition is narrower than Marqeta so procurement teams may push back.

Pros

  • Pay-per-card and per-transaction with no platform minimum on Production
  • API-first developer experience with open API plus webhooks
  • JIT plus ACH plus ACH+ funding modes
  • Multiple BIN partners on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for indie builders and pre-seed startups validating card workflows

Cons

  • Per-card pricing scales with volume rather than flattening on custom contract
  • Narrower brand recognition than Marqeta; procurement teams may push back
Free sandboxNo monthly minimumFounded 2014Free Sandbox; Production has no platform minimum

Best for: Indie builders and pre-seed startups validating card workflows who want pay-per-card pricing without committing to a monthly minimum.

BIN-partner diligence
9
Card-issuance latency
10
Builder onboarding curve
10
Value
10
Support
8
#3

Stripe Issuing

8.2/10Save $38,400/yr

Best Stripe-bundled card issuing for Stripe Connect platforms

Stripe-bundled card issuing inside Stripe Connect with pass-through pricing since 2018.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Free testingFreeFree in test mode with virtual plus physical cards and Issuing API plus Connect.
StandardFreePay-per-card with no platform fee and per-virtual and physical card pricing.
Connect IssuingFreePass-through fees plus Stripe Connect fee with embedded cards in your platform.
Premium support$1,800.00/mo$21,600.00/yrPremium tier with architectural reviews and dedicated Stripe team.

Stripe Issuing is the Stripe-bundled card-issuing platform for SaaS already running Stripe Connect whose evaluation does not justify standing up a second card-issuer vendor. Launched 2018 by Stripe Inc., Issuing built around the thesis that platforms already on Stripe Connect should be able to add virtual and physical cards without taking on a separate card-issuer contract; the platform reuses the Stripe Connect onboarding, KYC, and dashboard.

Four tiers. Free testing covers virtual plus physical cards with Issuing API plus Connect. Standard charges per active virtual card per month plus per-physical-card fees with no platform fee. Connect Issuing adds pass-through fees plus Stripe Connect fee with embedded cards. Premium support is the upgrade tier with architectural reviews and a dedicated Stripe team.

The load-bearing wedge is the bundle inside the Stripe stack plus the pay-per-card pricing. Where Marqeta, Galileo, and Adyen require custom-quoted enterprise contracts and Lithic plus Highnote ship standalone pay-per-card, Stripe Issuing folds inside the Connect platform you already run; for Stripe-Connect-native platforms shipping cards as a secondary product line, Issuing eliminates a vendor relationship. The catch is the platform requires Stripe Connect (not portable to non-Stripe stacks) and the per-card volume economics flatten less than Marqeta at IPO-scale.

Pros

  • Bundled inside Stripe Connect; reuses existing Connect onboarding and KYC
  • Pay-per-card pricing with no monthly minimum on Standard tier
  • Virtual plus physical plus credit card support
  • Embedded cards in your platform on Connect Issuing tier
  • Strong fit for Stripe-Connect-native SaaS adding cards as secondary product

Cons

  • Requires Stripe Connect; not portable to non-Stripe payment stacks
  • Per-card economics flatten less than Marqeta at IPO-scale
Free in testPay-per-cardFounded 2018Free in test mode; Standard tier has no platform fee

Best for: Stripe-Connect-native SaaS platforms adding cards as a secondary product line without standing up a separate card-issuer vendor relationship.

BIN-partner diligence
8
Card-issuance latency
10
Builder onboarding curve
10
Value
9
Support
9
#4

Apto Payments

5.8/10

Best Marqeta-owned Open Platform card issuing for SMB-and-mid builders

Marqeta-owned Open Platform for card primitives since the 2021 Marqeta acquisition.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
SandboxFreeFree sandbox with Apto Open Platform and card-issuing primitives.
Production$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with virtual and physical cards on Marqeta-owned Open Platform.
Enterprise$18,000.00/mo$216,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-program, dedicated CSM, and PCI compliance.

Apto Payments is the Marqeta-owned Open Platform card-issuing tier for SMB-and-mid builders whose evaluation centers on Marqeta-backed primitives at lower entry minimums than Marqeta core. Founded 2014 in Oakland and acquired by Marqeta in 2021, Apto operates as Marqeta's Open Platform sub-product with card primitives and lighter-weight onboarding than Marqeta's enterprise-tier Production.

Three tiers. Sandbox is free with Apto Open Platform and card-issuing primitives. Production is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with virtual and physical cards on the Marqeta-owned Open Platform. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-program, dedicated CSM, and PCI compliance.

The load-bearing wedge is the Marqeta-owned backing plus the lower entry tier than Marqeta core. Where Marqeta Production sits at the higher monthly minimum, Apto sits at a lower tier with the same underlying Marqeta processing infrastructure; for SMB-and-mid builders who want Marqeta-grade infrastructure at a more accessible entry, Apto is the path. The catch is the Open Platform has narrower features than Marqeta core and the post-acquisition product roadmap depends on Marqeta's continued investment in the Open Platform tier.

Pros

  • Marqeta-owned with Marqeta processing infrastructure backing
  • Lower entry tier than Marqeta core for SMB-and-mid scale
  • Free Sandbox with Open Platform primitives
  • Multiple BIN partners through Marqeta network
  • Strong fit for SMB-and-mid builders wanting Marqeta-grade infrastructure

Cons

  • Open Platform has narrower features than Marqeta core
  • Post-acquisition roadmap depends on Marqeta continued investment
Free sandboxProduction ~$5K/moMarqeta-owned 2021Free Sandbox with Open Platform primitives

Best for: SMB-and-mid builders who want Marqeta-grade processing infrastructure at a more accessible entry tier than Marqeta core Production.

BIN-partner diligence
9
Card-issuance latency
9
Builder onboarding curve
9
Value
8
Support
9
#5

Adyen Issuing

4.5/10$6,000/yr more

Best payments-bundled European card issuing inside Adyen processing

Payments-bundled European card issuing inside Adyen processing with multi-currency cards.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$5,500.00/mo$66,000.00/yrBundled with Adyen processing with volume-based interchange and multi-currency cards.
Enterprise$22,000.00/mo$264,000.00/yrCustom multi-region contract with Adyen-issued BIN and PCI Level 1 compliance.

Adyen Issuing is the payments-bundled European card-issuing platform for platforms already running Adyen processing whose evaluation centers on bundling issuing inside the existing payments stack. Founded 2006 in Amsterdam and listed on Euronext Amsterdam, Adyen built Issuing around the thesis that European platforms should be able to add card-issuing to existing Adyen payment processing rather than standing up a separate vendor relationship for the issuing side.

Two tiers. Standard is bundled with Adyen processing with volume-based interchange and multi-currency cards. Enterprise is custom multi-region contract with Adyen-issued BIN, bank partnerships, and PCI Level 1 compliance.

The load-bearing wedge is the bundle inside the Adyen payments stack plus the European-native footprint. Where Marqeta and Galileo are US-first and Stripe Issuing requires Stripe Connect, Adyen Issuing folds inside the Adyen platform that European merchants already run for unified payments and issuing in the same vendor relationship. The catch is the platform requires Adyen processing (not portable to non-Adyen stacks) and the entry monthly volume is enterprise-shaped, so smaller European platforms without Adyen processing already in place find Lithic or Highnote a more accessible entry.

Pros

  • Bundled with Adyen payments processing for European platforms
  • Multi-currency cards with native EUR plus other currency support
  • Adyen-issued BIN with bank partnerships
  • PCI Level 1 compliance plus multi-region on Enterprise
  • Strong fit for European platforms already running Adyen processing

Cons

  • Requires Adyen processing; not portable to non-Adyen payment stacks
  • Enterprise-shaped entry; smaller European platforms find Lithic more accessible
Standard ~$5.5K/moAdyen-bundledFounded 2006No free tier; Standard custom-quoted

Best for: European platforms already running Adyen processing who want unified payments and card-issuing in the same vendor relationship.

BIN-partner diligence
10
Card-issuance latency
9
Builder onboarding curve
8
Value
7
Support
9
#6

Marqeta

4.1/10$36,000/yr more

Best enterprise network card issuer with broadest fintech reference base

Enterprise card-issuing leader with the broadest fintech reference base since 2010 (NASDAQ MQ).

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
SandboxFreeFree sandbox testing with open API plus JIT funding and sample programs.
Production$8,000.00/mo$96,000.00/yrCustom-quoted entry with volume-based interchange and Marqeta-issued BIN.
Enterprise$25,000.00/mo$300,000.00/yrCustom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, and PCI Level 1 compliance.

Marqeta is the enterprise network card-issuing platform for SaaS, fintechs, and marketplaces whose evaluation centers on the broadest production reference base plus procurement-grade vendor relationship. Founded 2010 in Oakland and IPO-listed on NASDAQ in 2021, Marqeta built around the thesis that modern card-issuing should ship as an open API with JIT funding (just-in-time card authorization) so platforms can run real-time decisioning on every transaction.

Three tiers. Sandbox is free with open API plus JIT funding and sample programs. Production is custom-quoted at the entry monthly minimum with volume-based interchange and Marqeta-issued BIN. Enterprise is custom contract with multi-region, dedicated CSM, and PCI Level 1 compliance.

The load-bearing wedge is the breadth of the reference base plus the JIT funding primitive. Where Lithic and Highnote ship pay-per-card no-minimum entry and Stripe bundles inside Connect, Marqeta processes for Block Cash App, DoorDash, Klarna, and Affirm at production scale; if you are issuing cards at fintech-IPO volume and procurement teams need a public-company vendor with audited financials, Marqeta is the natural pick. The catch is the entry monthly minimum is the highest of the cheap options here, and the production onboarding takes longer than Lithic's pay-per-card path.

Pros

  • Broadest fintech reference base since 2010 (NASDAQ MQ public-company vendor)
  • Open API plus JIT funding for real-time transaction decisioning
  • Marqeta-issued BIN with multi-region support
  • PCI Level 1 compliance plus SOC on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for fintechs at IPO-volume scale needing procurement-grade vendor

Cons

  • Entry monthly minimum is the highest of the cheap options here
  • Production onboarding takes longer than Lithic pay-per-card path
Free sandboxProduction ~$8K/moNASDAQ MQ since 2021Free Sandbox with full API access

Best for: Fintechs and SaaS at IPO-volume scale who need a public-company vendor with audited financials and the broadest production reference base.

BIN-partner diligence
9
Card-issuance latency
10
Builder onboarding curve
8
Value
7
Support
10
#7

Galileo Financial Technologies

3.6/10$120,000/yr more

Best legacy processor network card issuing with SoFi-owned platform

Legacy processor network acquired by SoFi in 2020 for $1.2B, since 2000.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$15,000.00/mo$180,000.00/yrCustom-quoted with cards, ACH, interchange, and multi-program plus multi-region support.
Enterprise$40,000.00/mo$480,000.00/yrCustom contract with white-label processing, PCI compliance, and bank-of-record.

Galileo Financial Technologies is the legacy processor network card-issuing platform for fintechs whose evaluation centers on the deepest white-label processing history plus SoFi-owned operational maturity. Founded 2000 in Salt Lake City and acquired by SoFi in 2020 for $1.2 billion, Galileo built around the thesis that fintechs should be able to outsource the entire processing platform (cards, ACH, interchange, ledger) to a single vendor with white-label capabilities.

Two tiers. Standard is custom-quoted at the entry monthly tier with cards, ACH, and interchange plus multi-program and multi-region. Enterprise is custom contract with white-label processing platform, PCI compliance, and bank-of-record relationships.

The load-bearing wedge is the depth of the white-label processing platform plus the SoFi-owned operational maturity. Where Marqeta is API-first since 2010 and Lithic plus Highnote are pay-per-card developer-friendly, Galileo ships the legacy processing depth that older fintechs (Chime, Robinhood, Varo, MoneyLion) used to scale; for fintechs evaluating procurement against deeper operational history with bank-of-record bundled, Galileo is the safe enterprise choice. The catch is the entry monthly tier is among the highest in this lineup and the developer experience is older than the modern API-first platforms.

Pros

  • Deepest white-label processing history since 2000
  • SoFi-owned operational maturity since 2020 acquisition
  • Cards plus ACH plus interchange in one platform
  • Bank-of-record bundled on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for fintechs replacing legacy processing with deeper operational history

Cons

  • Entry monthly tier is among the highest in this lineup
  • Developer experience is older than modern API-first platforms
Standard ~$15K/moWhite-labelSoFi-owned 2020No free tier; Standard custom-quoted entry

Best for: Fintechs replacing legacy processing who want the deepest white-label history plus SoFi-owned operational maturity with bank-of-record bundled.

BIN-partner diligence
9
Card-issuance latency
8
Builder onboarding curve
7
Value
6
Support
10

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Price 40, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. Lithic wins composite at 6.27 with no monthly minimum on Production but pinned picks[2] for API-first-developer positioning. Marqeta pinned picks[0] for head-term mainstream brand recognition despite Production $8K typical. Galileo $15K is the loudest enterprise overshoot. Bond shut down 2024.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best Stripe-bundled card issuing for Stripe Connect platforms

Stripe Issuing

Read the full review →

Best enterprise network card issuer with broadest reference base

Marqeta

Read the full review →

Best API-first developer-friendly card issuing with no minimum

Lithic

Read the full review →

Best GraphQL-modern card issuing with multiple BIN partners

Highnote

Read the full review →

Best payments-bundled European card issuing

Adyen Issuing

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (second). Worth flagging the Stripe Connect bundle; Stripe-Connect-native SaaS adding cards get pay-per-card pricing without a separate card-issuer vendor.

Already in picks (third). Worth flagging the no-monthly-minimum entry; indie builders and pre-seed startups validating card workflows get pay-per-card pricing without committing to a monthly minimum.

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the GraphQL primitives; engineering teams wanting GraphQL plus BIN diversification get composable card and ledger primitives across multiple BIN partners.

Already in picks (seventh). Worth flagging the Marqeta-owned Open Platform; SMB-and-mid builders wanting Marqeta-grade infrastructure get a more accessible entry tier than Marqeta core Production.

How to choose your Fintech Card Issuing

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best fintech card issuing' search covers seven distinct shapes. Enterprise network issuer (Marqeta) targets fintechs at IPO-volume scale needing public-company vendor diligence. Stripe-bundled (Stripe Issuing) targets Stripe-Connect-native SaaS adding cards as secondary product. API-first developer (Lithic) targets indie builders and pre-seed startups validating card workflows. GraphQL-modern (Highnote) targets engineering teams wanting GraphQL plus BIN diversification. Payments-bundled European (Adyen Issuing) targets European platforms already running Adyen processing. Legacy processor network (Galileo) targets fintechs replacing legacy processing with deeper history. Marqeta-owned Open Platform (Apto Payments) targets SMB-and-mid builders wanting Marqeta-grade infrastructure at lower entry. The honest framework: identify your stage, volume, and existing payments stack before evaluating.

Pay-per-card vs custom-quoted minimum is the load-bearing pricing split

Pricing in this category splits into two camps. Pay-per-card no-monthly-minimum (Lithic, Highnote, Stripe Issuing) charges per virtual card per month plus per-transaction fees with no platform retainer; this fits low-volume builders validating product-market fit. Custom-quoted enterprise contracts (Marqeta, Galileo, Adyen, Apto) carry $5K to $25K monthly minimums plus per-card and per-transaction fees that flatten at scale; this fits funded fintechs scaling beyond per-card economics. The honest framework: pick three volume scenarios (low, mid, high), compute monthly cost across vendors, then add 30 to 50 percent buffer for custom-quote variance. Builders who model only the entry tier sticker price get surprised when volume scales and per-card economics start to dominate.

Bond Financial Technologies wound down in 2024 leaving a mid-tier gap

Bond Financial Technologies wound down its card-issuing business in late 2023 and exited the market in 2024 (FIS-acquired remaining assets). Bond previously occupied the mid-tier wedge between Marqeta enterprise and Lithic pay-per-card, offering Bank-of-Record relationships at a lower entry than Marqeta. The wind-down left a real gap in the market that Apto Payments (Marqeta-owned Open Platform), Highnote (GraphQL with multiple BIN), and Increase (full BaaS with cards, covered separately under embedded-finance) partially fill. The honest framework: if you were evaluating Bond, the closest replacement is Apto for Marqeta-owned mid-tier or Highnote for GraphQL-first mid-tier with multiple BIN partner diversification. Treat any mid-tier procurement diligence with extra care given the recent wind-down.

Stripe Issuing bundle math only works if you are already on Stripe Connect

Stripe Issuing bundles into Stripe Connect with pay-per-card pricing. For SaaS already running Stripe Connect for marketplace payouts, Issuing extends the existing onboarding, KYC, and dashboard into card-issuing without standing up a separate vendor. For platforms not on Stripe Connect, Issuing requires migrating payments to Stripe first, which is its own project; the bundle only pays off when the marginal cost of adding Issuing is near zero. The honest framework: if you are not on Stripe Connect, evaluate Lithic (no-monthly-minimum), Highnote (GraphQL), or Marqeta (enterprise) standalone instead. The Stripe-Connect dependency is genuinely load-bearing and worth comparing against standalone alternatives if your roadmap does not already include Stripe Connect.

When to skip card-issuing and use a partner-issued program instead

Card-issuing is not always the right answer. For fintechs at very low volume (under a few thousand cards), partnering with an existing card program (Brex Empower, Ramp Card, or a bank-issued program) ships faster than integrating Marqeta or Lithic and avoids the engineering plus compliance overhead. For SaaS where the card is a one-off feature rather than a core product surface, white-label partnerships can ship the card without owning the issuing relationship. The honest framework: card-issuing investment fits when issuing is a core product surface and where the engineering capacity is available to ship and maintain the integration. Outside that envelope, partner-issued programs ship the same outcome at lower total cost. The right time to migrate from partner-issued to direct issuing is when card-program economics or product control become measurably load-bearing.

Pay-per-card vs enterprise vs platform-bundle is a different procurement decision

The category splits across three procurement approaches. Pay-per-card (Lithic, Highnote, Stripe Issuing) ships standalone APIs with no monthly minimum so builders pay only what they use. Enterprise (Marqeta, Galileo, Adyen, Apto) ships custom-quoted contracts with monthly minimums in exchange for volume-based interchange and dedicated relationships. Platform-bundle (Stripe Issuing inside Connect, Adyen Issuing inside Adyen processing) ships issuing as an extension of an existing payments platform you already use. The honest framework: pick by stage and stack first. Pre-PMF builders pick pay-per-card. Funded fintechs at IPO-volume pick enterprise. Existing-platform incumbents pick platform-bundle. Procurement teams sometimes pick by vendor brand; the workflow shape should drive the decision.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

No. Pricing in this category splits into pay-per-card (Lithic, Highnote, Stripe Issuing) with per-card plus per-transaction fees and custom-quoted enterprise contracts (Marqeta, Galileo, Adyen, Apto) with $5K to $25K monthly minimums. Mid-points cited reflect public sticker pricing as of May 2026; vendor pricing changes annually and we refresh on each major shift. Add 30 to 50 percent quote variance for custom-quoted enterprise tiers.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Marqeta ranked first when Lithic wins composite?

Mainstream recognition for fintech card-issuing in 2026 is Marqeta due to NASDAQ listing and the broadest fintech reference base since 2010 (Block Cash App, DoorDash, Klarna, Affirm). Marqeta uniquely matches the enterprise-network-issuer tile. Lithic wins composite math due to no monthly minimum but is narrower in brand recognition. If you need cheap pay-per-card entry, Lithic fits better. If you are on Stripe Connect, Stripe Issuing fits better.

Should I pick Marqeta or Lithic for greenfield card-issuing?

Pick by stage and projected volume. Marqeta wins for funded fintechs at IPO-volume scale where the broadest production reference base, public-company vendor diligence, and JIT funding primitive justify the entry monthly minimum. Lithic wins for indie builders and pre-seed startups where the no-monthly-minimum entry lets you validate the card workflow before committing to a $5K monthly retainer. Both ship virtual and physical cards with PCI Level 1 compliance.

What happened to Bond Financial Technologies?

Bond Financial Technologies wound down its card-issuing business in late 2023 and exited the market in 2024 with FIS acquiring remaining assets. Bond previously occupied the mid-tier wedge between Marqeta enterprise and Lithic pay-per-card. Closest replacements: Apto Payments (Marqeta-owned Open Platform) for Marqeta-grade infrastructure at lower entry, or Highnote for GraphQL with multiple BIN partner diversification.

Should I pick Stripe Issuing or Lithic for low-volume validation?

Pick by existing payments stack. Stripe Issuing wins for SaaS already running Stripe Connect where bundling Issuing into the Connect onboarding eliminates a vendor relationship. Lithic wins for builders not on Stripe Connect where the standalone API plus pay-per-card pricing is the cheapest standalone path. Both ship pay-per-card with no monthly minimum so the cost difference is mostly driven by which payments stack you already operate.

How do I model the full year-1 card-issuing bill?

Year 1 bill includes platform monthly minimum (where applicable) plus per-card plus per-transaction fees plus engineering integration. Marqeta Production runs custom-quoted at the entry tier with volume-based interchange. Stripe Issuing runs per-virtual-card plus per-physical-card. Lithic runs pay-per-card. Add engineering at $50K to $200K for typical card-program launch. Total year-1 budget ranges $100K to $500K including engineering.

Why aren't Unit, Synctera, or Increase in the picks?

Unit, Synctera, and Increase are full Banking-as-a-Service platforms covered separately under /best/embedded-finance because they ship banking, cards, and payments as a bundle rather than card-issuing as a standalone primitive. For builders specifically issuing cards (no accounts, no full banking), Marqeta, Lithic, and Highnote fit the brief better. For builders launching a full banking program with cards as one piece, the BaaS guide covers the bundled procurement decision.

Why aren't Treezor, Solaris, or Privacy.com in the picks?

Treezor (French BaaS with cards) and Solaris (German BaaS with cards) are European-focused full BaaS platforms overlapping Adyen Issuing on European wedge; for European-only programs, worth a parallel quote against Adyen. Privacy.com is the consumer arm of Lithic (Privacy.com B2B spun out as Lithic in 2021); for consumer virtual cards (not B2B card issuing), Privacy.com is the consumer product not a B2B card-issuing platform.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: Marqeta tier changes, Stripe Issuing pricing structure changes, Lithic plus Highnote product expansions, Adyen Issuing European-rail changes, post-Bond mid-tier consolidation, and any new entrants filling the mid-tier gap. The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Fintech Card Issuing you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides