Mailosaur
7.3Save $288/yrBest enterprise QA email testing with Selenium, Cypress, Playwright bindings
Enterprise QA email testing with first-class Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright SDK bindings for end-to-end automation.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free trial | Free | — | 14-day full-feature trial with no card required. |
| Personal | $25.00/mo | $240.00/yr | 15K inbound emails per month with one inbox and unlimited email addresses. |
| Core | $63.00/mo | $600.00/yr | 75K inbound emails with multiple inboxes and unlimited addresses each. |
| Enterprise | $599.00/mo | $6,468.00/yr | Custom inbound volume with separate inbox permissions and dedicated support. |
Mailosaur is the enterprise QA email testing platform for teams running Selenium, Cypress, or Playwright end-to-end suites that need to read OTP codes, check magic-link flows, or validate password-reset paths. Founded 2013 in London, Mailosaur built around the thesis that QA-driven email testing should ship with first-class SDK bindings rather than generic SMTP capture plus manual API integration.
Four tiers serve four buyers. Free trial covers 14 days with full API access. Pro covers 10K messages with unlimited inboxes and Selenium, Cypress, Playwright bindings. Plus scales to 100K with custom domains and webhook automations. Business unlocks 1M messages with SSO, SAML, and 99.99% SLA.
The load-bearing wedge is the SDK bindings plus QA workflow integration. Where Mailtrap covers dev-testing collaboration and Mailpit covers self-hosted SMTP, Mailosaur ships ready-made SDK methods for Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright so engineers write `cy.mailosaurGetMessage` or `await page.waitForMailosaurMessage()` directly in test code; for teams whose CI runs E2E suites with email flows, the SDK reduces test scaffolding. The catch is higher entry pricing than Mailtrap Individual for similar message volumes if QA bindings are not the load-bearing requirement.
Pros
- First-class Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright SDK bindings
- Email and SMS testing in one platform
- Custom domains plus webhook automations on Plus
- 99.99% uptime SLA on Business
- CI/CD integrations for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI
Cons
- Higher entry pricing than Mailtrap for similar message volumes
- Overkill if you do not run E2E test automation
Best for: QA and SDET teams running Selenium, Cypress, or Playwright suites that exercise email flows like OTP, magic links, or password reset.
- Coverage breadth
- 9
- Capture latency
- 10
- Integration overhead
- 9
- Value
- 8
- Support
- 9