Skip to content

Best Dog Daycare and Pet Boarding Software of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist with GPS tracking as primary surface since 2014.

BEST OVERALL6.1/10Save $528/yr

Time to Pet

Pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist with GPS tracking as primary surface since 2014.

Free trial available

How it stacks up

  • Pet-sitting specialist

    vs Gingr facility

  • US-founded 2014

    vs PetExec enterprise

  • Bootstrap product

    vs PawLoyalty grooming

#2
ProPet5.7/10

From $59/mo

View
#3
Kennel Connection4.9/10

From $89/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingScore
1Time to PetBest pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist platform$45.00/mo6.1/10
2ProPetBest affordable mid pet-care platform$59.00/mo5.7/10
3Kennel ConnectionBest legacy cloud boarding platform$89.00/mo4.9/10
4PawLoyaltyBest mid-market boarding plus grooming platform$79.00/mo4.9/10
5GingrBest mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform with deepest installed base$99.00/mo4.9/10
6DaySmart PetBest legacy mainstream boarding platform with longest installed base$59.00/mo4.8/10
7PetExecBest enterprise multi-site boarding platform$129.00/mo3.9/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 7 picks

Top spec
#1Time to Pet6.1/10$45.00/mo$540.00/yrSave $528/yrPet-sitting specialist
#2ProPet5.7/10$59.00/mo$708.00/yrSave $360/yrAffordable mid pet-care
#3Kennel Connection4.9/10$89.00/mo$1,068.00/yrLegacy cloud boarding
#4PawLoyalty4.9/10$79.00/mo$948.00/yrSave $120/yrMid-market boarding-grooming
#5Gingr4.9/10$99.00/mo$1,188.00/yr$120/yr moreMainstream all-in-one
#6DaySmart Pet4.8/10$99.00/mo$1,188.00/yr$120/yr moreLegacy mainstream boarding
#7PetExec3.9/10$129.00/mo$1,548.00/yr$480/yr moreEnterprise multi-site
#1

Time to Pet

6.1/10Save $528/yr

Best pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist platform

Pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist with GPS tracking as primary surface since 2014.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$45.00/mo$540.00/yrEntry staff-count monthly tier for 1 to 9 staff with pet-sitting plus dog-walking scheduling, customer portal, payments, and GPS tracking.
Plus$95.00/mo$1,140.00/yrMid staff-count monthly tier for 10 to 49 staff adding multi-staff coordination, reporting, integrations, API access, and custom branding.
Enterprise$199.00/mo$2,388.00/yrTop staff-count monthly tier for 50-plus staff with multi-location, group reporting, dedicated CSM, and custom workflows.

Time to Pet is the pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist platform for in-home pet-care operators whose evaluation centers on staff-count-tiered scheduling plus GPS tracking as primary surfaces. Founded 2014 in the US and bootstrapped, Time to Pet built around the thesis that in-home pet-sitting and dog-walking operators do not need facility-boarding infrastructure (cabin assignments, kennel reservations, on-site daycare check-in); they need walker-staff scheduling, GPS-tracked visit logging, customer-facing visit reports with photos, and per-walker payroll workflow tuned to mobile pet-care operations.

Three staff-count-tiered monthly tiers. Standard at the entry staff-count monthly rate for 1 to 9 staff covers pet-sitting plus dog-walking scheduling, customer portal, payments, and GPS tracking. Plus at roughly double Standard for 10 to 49 staff adds multi-staff coordination, reporting, integrations, API access, and custom branding. Enterprise at roughly quadruple Standard for 50-plus staff adds multi-location, group reporting, dedicated CSM, and custom workflows.

The load-bearing wedge is the staff-count-tiered pricing model plus the GPS tracking primary surface plus the in-home pet-care operational depth. Operators running dog walks and pet-sitting visits across dozens of homes daily get a tool where every operational layer (walker scheduling, GPS visit logging, customer photo updates, walker payroll) is a first-class surface, with per-walker scaling that matches the actual cost driver of in-home pet-care. The catch is the lane narrowness for facility-boarding operations. Time to Pet does not ship native boarding, daycare, grooming, or training infrastructure; facility-based operators running boarding and daycare get more lift from Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, or any of the facility-based platforms in the lineup, regardless of Time to Pet's staff-count-tiered pricing advantage.

Pros

  • Staff-count-tiered pricing scales with walker count rather than location count
  • GPS tracking primary surface for in-home pet-care visit logging
  • Customer-facing visit reports with photos for parent-engagement
  • Multi-staff plus reporting plus API access on Plus tier
  • Strong fit for in-home pet-sitting and dog-walking operators with mobile pet-care

Cons

  • No native boarding, daycare, grooming, or training infrastructure for facility operators
  • Lane narrowness for facility-based pet-care operations regardless of pricing advantage
Pet-sitting specialistUS-founded 2014Bootstrap productFree trial available

Best for: In-home pet-sitting and dog-walking operators running mobile pet-care wanting staff-count-tiered scheduling and GPS tracking over facility-boarding alternatives.

Pet data plus payment posture
9
Time to first booked reservation
9
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
9
Value
9
Support
8
#2

ProPet

5.7/10Save $360/yr

Best affordable mid pet-care platform

Affordable mid pet-care platform at the cheapest entry monthly tier in the lineup since 2014.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$59.00/mo$708.00/yrCheapest entry monthly tier with boarding, daycare, grooming, customer portal, and payments for small single-location facilities.
Plus$129.00/mo$1,548.00/yrMid per-location monthly tier adding marketing, reports, integrations, API access, and custom branding.

ProPet is the affordable mid pet-care platform for cost-conscious small facilities whose evaluation centers on the cheapest entry monthly tier in the lineup plus broad pet-care coverage at meaningfully lower cost than mainstream alternatives. Founded 2014 in Canada and bootstrapped, ProPet built around the thesis that small and mid-market pet-care facilities do not want to pay Gingr Standard or PetExec Standard rates that price out smaller operations; they want a platform with broad pet-care feature coverage at the cheapest possible entry monthly subscription with publicly-listed pricing rather than sales-call-led custom quotes.

Two publicly-listed monthly tiers. Standard at the cheapest entry monthly rate per location covers boarding, daycare, grooming, customer portal, and payments. Plus at roughly 2.2 times Standard adds marketing, reports, integrations, API access, and custom branding.

The load-bearing wedge is the cheapest entry monthly tier in the lineup plus the publicly-listed pricing transparency plus the bootstrap-product reliability tuned through twelve years of small-facility feedback. Small and mid-market facilities get a tool at less than two-thirds of Gingr Standard pricing, with publicly-listed pricing that competing platforms quote only through sales calls. The catch is the smaller installed base than Gingr plus the narrower services scope. ProPet's installed base is meaningfully smaller than Gingr's, raising onboarding cost for staff coming from prior Gingr experience. The platform also does not ship native training-services scheduling; facilities running training classes alongside boarding pay for a separate training-management tool.

Pros

  • Cheapest entry monthly tier in the lineup with broad pet-care coverage
  • Publicly-listed pricing transparency uncommon in the category
  • Bootstrap-product reliability since 2014 without venture-funding pricing pressure
  • Marketing plus reports plus API access on Plus tier
  • Strong fit for small and mid-market pet-care facilities with limited budgets

Cons

  • Smaller installed base than Gingr raises onboarding cost for new staff
  • No native training-services scheduling; facilities with training classes need a separate tool
Affordable mid pet-careCA-founded 2014Bootstrap productFree trial available on all paid tiers

Best for: Small and mid-market pet-care facilities wanting the cheapest entry monthly tier and pricing transparency over mainstream alternatives at higher monthly cost.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
8
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
8
Value
9
Support
7
#3

Kennel Connection

4.9/10

Best legacy cloud boarding platform

Legacy cloud boarding platform with longest desktop-to-cloud migration history since 1992.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Cloud Standard$89.00/mo$1,068.00/yrEntry cloud per-location monthly tier with boarding, daycare, grooming, training, customer portal, and reservations for single-location facilities.
Cloud Plus$159.00/mo$1,908.00/yrMid cloud per-location monthly tier adding marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, APIs, and multi-user access.

Kennel Connection is the legacy cloud boarding platform for facilities whose evaluation centers on the longest desktop-to-cloud migration history in the lineup plus broad boarding-and-training services scope. Founded 1992 in the US under Blue Crystal Software and bootstrapped, Kennel Connection built around the thesis that boarding facilities running on-premise pet-care software for decades do not want to migrate to a totally different platform; they want a cloud-migration path from the same vendor they already trust, with familiar workflow patterns preserved across the desktop-to-cloud transition.

Two cloud per-location monthly tiers. Cloud Standard at the entry cloud per-location monthly rate covers boarding, daycare, grooming, training, customer portal, and reservations. Cloud Plus at roughly 1.8 times Cloud Standard adds marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, APIs, and multi-user access.

The load-bearing wedge is the longest desktop-to-cloud migration history across thirty-four years since 1992 plus the broad boarding-and-training services scope plus the bootstrap-product reliability under Blue Crystal Software ownership. Legacy boarding facilities transitioning from on-premise software get a cloud-migration path from the same vendor they already trust, with workflow patterns preserved across the transition. The catch is the smaller installed base than Gingr or DaySmart Pet plus the lighter cloud-native UX polish than venture-backed alternatives. Kennel Connection's installed base is meaningfully smaller than the mainstream alternatives, raising onboarding cost for staff coming from prior mainstream-platform experience. The cloud-native UX also feels denser than Gingr or Time to Pet at equivalent functionality, with longer training curves for staff familiar with consumer-grade SaaS.

Pros

  • Longest desktop-to-cloud migration history across thirty-four years since 1992
  • Broad boarding plus daycare plus grooming plus training services scope
  • Bootstrap-product reliability under Blue Crystal Software ownership
  • Marketing plus reviews plus advanced reporting plus QuickBooks on Cloud Plus tier
  • Strong fit for legacy boarding facilities transitioning from on-premise software

Cons

  • Smaller installed base than Gingr or DaySmart Pet for mainstream-platform staff
  • Cloud-native UX feels denser than Gingr or Time to Pet at equivalent functionality
Legacy cloud boardingUS-founded 1992Blue Crystal SoftwareFree trial available

Best for: Legacy boarding facilities transitioning from on-premise pet-care software wanting cloud-migration continuity from the same vendor over modern alternatives.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
7
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
7
Value
8
Support
8
#4

PawLoyalty

4.9/10Save $120/yr

Best mid-market boarding plus grooming platform

Mid-market boarding plus grooming platform with integrated multi-services scheduling since 2010.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$79.00/mo$948.00/yrEntry per-location monthly tier with daycare, boarding, grooming scheduling, customer portal, payments, and texting for single-location facilities.
Plus$149.00/mo$1,788.00/yrMid per-location monthly tier adding marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, Stripe, and API integrations.

PawLoyalty is the mid-market boarding plus grooming platform for single-location facilities whose evaluation centers on integrated multi-services scheduling at mid-market pricing. Founded 2010 in the US and bootstrapped, PawLoyalty built around the thesis that single-location boarding facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming services together do not want to pay enterprise pricing for multi-location infrastructure they will never use; they want a tool tuned to single-location multi-services operations at price-positioning that sits between affordable alternatives like ProPet and mainstream alternatives like Gingr.

Two per-location monthly tiers, both publicly listed. Standard at the entry per-location monthly rate covers daycare, boarding, grooming scheduling, customer portal, payments, and texting. Plus at roughly 1.9 times Standard adds marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, Stripe, and API integrations.

The load-bearing wedge is the integrated boarding-plus-daycare-plus-grooming services scheduling plus the single-location pricing focus plus the publicly-listed pricing transparency uncommon in the category. Single-location facilities running multiple service lines get a tool tuned to that exact procurement shape, with grooming-appointment scheduling integrated into the boarding-and-daycare reservation engine rather than running as a separate workflow. The catch is the lack of native multi-location infrastructure plus the lighter training-services scope. PawLoyalty does not ship multi-location consolidation; facilities planning expansion to multi-site operations need to migrate to Gingr, PetExec, or DaySmart Pet at the multi-location tier. PawLoyalty also does not ship native training-services scheduling; facilities running training classes alongside boarding pay for a separate training-management tool.

Pros

  • Integrated boarding plus daycare plus grooming scheduling for single-location facilities
  • Publicly-listed pricing transparency uncommon in the category
  • Marketing plus reviews plus QuickBooks plus Stripe on Plus tier
  • Mid-market price positioning between ProPet and Gingr
  • Strong fit for single-location facilities running multiple service lines together

Cons

  • No native multi-location consolidation; facilities expanding need to migrate to Gingr or PetExec
  • No native training-services scheduling; facilities with training classes need a separate tool
Mid-market boarding-groomingUS-founded 2010Bootstrap productFree trial available

Best for: Single-location facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming together wanting integrated multi-services scheduling at mid-market pricing.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
8
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
8
Value
8
Support
7
#5

Gingr

4.9/10$120/yr more

Best mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform with deepest installed base

Mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform with deepest US facility installed base since 2011.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$99.00/mo$1,188.00/yrEntry per-location monthly tier with pet-care booking, boarding, daycare, customer portal, payments, and texting for single-location facilities.
Plus$179.00/mo$2,148.00/yrMid per-location monthly tier adding marketing automation, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, Stripe, and API integrations.
Enterprise$329.00/mo$3,948.00/yrTop per-location monthly tier with group dashboards, advanced reporting, dedicated CSM, and custom workflows for multi-location operators.

Gingr is the mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform incumbent for boarding facilities and doggie daycares whose evaluation centers on the deepest US facility-based installed base plus the broadest services-scope coverage in the lineup. Founded 2011 in the US and acquired by Higher Logic in 2021, Gingr built around the thesis that facility owners running boarding plus daycare plus grooming plus training under one roof do not want four separate tools; they want a single platform handling every service-line under one customer portal, with reservation engine, payments, texting, and marketing automation tuned to multi-service pet-care operations.

Three per-location monthly tiers, all custom-quoted by services scope and pet capacity. Standard at the entry per-location monthly rate covers pet-care booking, boarding, daycare, customer portal, payments, and texting. Plus at roughly 1.8 times Standard adds marketing automation, reviews, advanced reporting, QuickBooks, Stripe, and API integrations. Enterprise at roughly 3.3 times Standard adds group dashboards, advanced reporting, dedicated CSM, and custom workflows for multi-location operators.

The load-bearing wedge is the all-in-one services-scope coverage plus the deepest US facility-based installed base across fifteen years plus the Higher Logic platform-investment trajectory since 2021. Facilities running multiple service lines get a single tool that handles boarding reservations, daycare check-in, grooming appointments, and training class scheduling under one customer portal, with billing reconciliation across all service lines that single-service platforms cannot match. The catch is the higher per-location pricing than affordable alternatives plus the all-in-one feature density. ProPet runs at less than two-thirds of Gingr Standard at narrower services scope; small single-service facilities (boarding-only, daycare-only) find ProPet adequate without paying for unused multi-service infrastructure.

Pros

  • Deepest US facility-based installed base across fifteen years since 2011
  • All-in-one services-scope covers boarding, daycare, grooming, and training
  • Marketing automation plus reviews plus QuickBooks plus Stripe on Plus tier
  • Group dashboards plus dedicated CSM plus custom workflows on Enterprise
  • Strong fit for facilities running multiple service lines under one customer portal

Cons

  • ProPet runs cheaper at narrower services scope for single-service small facilities
  • All-in-one feature density adds learning curve for staff coming from single-service tools
Mainstream all-in-oneUS-founded 2011Higher Logic-acquired 2021Free trial available; demo on enterprise tiers

Best for: Facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming plus training under one roof wanting all-in-one services scope and the deepest US installed base.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
8
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
8
Value
7
Support
8
#6

DaySmart Pet

4.8/10$120/yr more

Best legacy mainstream boarding platform with longest installed base

Legacy mainstream boarding platform with the longest US installed base since 1988.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Lite$59.00/mo$708.00/yrEntry per-location monthly tier with online booking, boarding, grooming, daycare, customer portal, and payments for small facilities.
Pro$99.00/mo$1,188.00/yrMid per-location monthly tier adding marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, multi-staff scheduling, and integrations.
Enterprise$199.00/mo$2,388.00/yrTop per-location monthly tier with multi-location, group reporting, API access, and dedicated CSM for facility groups.

DaySmart Pet is the legacy mainstream boarding platform for facilities whose evaluation centers on the longest US installed base plus familiar UX patterns inherited from decades of pet-care software lineage. Founded 1988 in the US under earlier brand names (123Pet) and consolidated under the DaySmart Software umbrella following PE acquisition, DaySmart Pet built around the thesis that legacy boarding facilities running paper-based reservations or on-premise software for years do not want a modern reinvention; they want familiar UX patterns, the longest installed base in the lineup, and DaySmart Software's broader pet-care platform investment trajectory.

Three per-location monthly tiers. Lite at the cheapest entry per-location monthly rate covers online booking, boarding, grooming, daycare, customer portal, and payments. Pro at roughly 1.7 times Lite adds marketing, reviews, advanced reporting, multi-staff scheduling, and integrations. Enterprise at roughly 3.4 times Lite adds multi-location, group reporting, API access, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the longest US installed base across thirty-eight years since 1988 plus the familiar UX patterns plus the DaySmart Software platform-investment trajectory under PE ownership. Legacy facilities transitioning from paper reservations or on-premise software get a tool with UX patterns and operational workflows familiar from decades of industry use, with platform investment that drives modernisation while preserving familiar surfaces. The catch is the dated UX feel versus modern alternatives plus the price gap to affordable entry alternatives. The DaySmart Pet interface feels denser than Gingr or Time to Pet for staff coming from consumer-grade SaaS, with longer training curves for younger staff hires. ProPet ships at a meaningfully lower entry rate with adequate single-or-two-service coverage; small facilities prioritising cost over installed-base depth often find the Lite tier hard to justify against ProPet's broader entry-level package.

Pros

  • Longest US installed base across thirty-eight years since 1988
  • Familiar UX patterns inherited from decades of pet-care software lineage
  • DaySmart Software platform-investment trajectory under PE ownership
  • Multi-location plus group reporting plus API access on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for legacy facilities transitioning from paper reservations or on-premise software

Cons

  • Dated UX feels denser than Gingr or Time to Pet for consumer-grade SaaS staff
  • ProPet ships a lower entry rate with adequate single-or-two-service coverage for cost-prioritising facilities
Legacy mainstream boardingUS-founded 1988DaySmart-PE-backedFree trial available; demo on enterprise tiers

Best for: Legacy boarding facilities transitioning from paper reservations or on-premise software wanting the longest installed base and familiar UX patterns over modern alternatives.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
7
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
7
Value
8
Support
8
#7

PetExec

3.9/10$480/yr more

Best enterprise multi-site boarding platform

Enterprise multi-site boarding platform with deepest group-consolidation infrastructure since 2002.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$129.00/mo$1,548.00/yrEntry per-location monthly tier with boarding, daycare, grooming, training, customer portal, payments, and reservation engine for single-location facilities.
Plus$229.00/mo$2,748.00/yrMid per-location monthly tier adding multi-location, advanced reporting, marketing automation, and integrations for growing facility groups.
Enterprise$399.00/mo$4,788.00/yrTop per-location monthly tier with group consolidation, dedicated CSM, API access, and custom workflows for enterprise multi-site groups.

PetExec is the enterprise multi-site boarding platform for boarding facility groups whose evaluation centers on the deepest group-consolidation infrastructure for ten-plus-location operations. Founded 2002 in the US and bootstrapped to profitability, PetExec built around the thesis that enterprise boarding groups consolidating ten-plus locations under one parent organisation do not just need per-location reservation management; they need group-level reporting that consolidates revenue, occupancy, and operational metrics across all facilities, plus dedicated CSM relationships that handle the operational complexity that consumer-grade alternatives cannot match.

Three per-location monthly tiers, all custom-quoted by location count and services scope. Standard at the entry per-location monthly rate covers boarding, daycare, grooming, training, customer portal, payments, and reservations. Plus at roughly 1.75 times Standard adds multi-location, advanced reporting, marketing automation, and integrations. Enterprise at roughly triple Standard adds group consolidation, dedicated CSM, API access, and custom workflows.

The load-bearing wedge is the longest enterprise multi-site boarding installed base across twenty-four years since 2002 plus the group-consolidation infrastructure depth plus the bootstrap-product reliability without venture-funding pricing pressure. Enterprise boarding groups get a tool tuned through two decades of multi-location feedback, with group reporting and consolidation that handle the operational complexity of regional or national boarding chains. The catch is the higher per-location pricing for single-location facilities plus the enterprise-tuned UX. PetExec Standard runs roughly 30 percent more than Gingr Standard at single-location pricing; small single-location facilities find Gingr or PawLoyalty adequate without paying for unused multi-site consolidation infrastructure.

Pros

  • Longest enterprise multi-site boarding installed base across twenty-four years since 2002
  • Deepest group-consolidation infrastructure for ten-plus-location operations
  • Multi-location plus advanced reporting plus marketing automation on Plus tier
  • Group consolidation plus dedicated CSM plus API access on Enterprise tier
  • Strong fit for enterprise boarding groups with regional or national footprint

Cons

  • Higher per-location pricing than Gingr or PawLoyalty for small single-location facilities
  • Enterprise-tuned UX adds learning curve for staff coming from consumer-grade tools
Enterprise multi-siteUS-founded 2002Bootstrap productFree trial available; demo on enterprise tiers

Best for: Enterprise boarding groups consolidating ten-plus locations under one parent organisation wanting the deepest group-consolidation infrastructure.

Pet data plus payment posture
8
Time to first booked reservation
7
Setup curve for non-technical facility owners
7
Value
7
Support
9

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Price 40, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. Time to Pet leads composite at neutral fit but serves in-home pet-sitting, a different procurement shape from facility-boarding. Gingr pinned first for head-term brand recognition as the mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform with deepest US facility-based installed base since 2011.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform with deepest installed base

Gingr

Read the full review →

Best enterprise multi-site boarding platform

PetExec

Read the full review →

Best pet-sitting and dog-walking specialist platform

Time to Pet

Read the full review →

Best legacy mainstream boarding platform with longest installed base

DaySmart Pet

Read the full review →

Best affordable mid pet-care platform

ProPet

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (first). Worth flagging the higher per-location pricing than affordable alternatives; small single-service facilities get more lift from ProPet at less than two-thirds of Gingr Standard at narrower services scope.

Already in picks (third). Worth flagging the lane narrowness for facility-based pet-care; facility operators running boarding and daycare get more lift from any of the six facility-based platforms regardless of staff-count pricing advantage.

Already in picks (fourth). Worth flagging the dated UX feel; staff coming from consumer-grade SaaS like Gingr or Time to Pet find the interface denser, raising onboarding time for younger staff hires.

Already in picks (fifth). Worth flagging the multi-location infrastructure gap; facilities planning expansion to multi-site operations need to migrate to Gingr, PetExec, or DaySmart Pet at the multi-location tier.

How to choose your Dog Daycare and Pet Boarding Software

Pick the procurement shape before you pick the vendor

Dog daycare and pet boarding software splits into two procurement shapes operators commonly conflate. Facility-based platforms (Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, PawLoyalty, ProPet, Kennel Connection) ship online booking, boarding, daycare, grooming, training, customer portal, payments, and texting tuned to brick-and-mortar boarding facilities and doggie daycares. In-home pet-sitting platforms (Time to Pet) ship pet-sitting and dog-walking scheduling with GPS tracking and walker-staff coordination tuned to mobile pet-care operators. Match the shape to the operation. Single-location boarding facilities should weight Gingr or DaySmart Pet; enterprise multi-site groups should weight PetExec; in-home pet-sitting and dog-walking operators should weight Time to Pet; cost-conscious mid-market facilities should weight ProPet; mid-market single-location boarding plus grooming operations should weight PawLoyalty; legacy facilities migrating from on-premise software should weight Kennel Connection or DaySmart Pet for familiar UX patterns.

Pet-care software runs on two different pricing models

Pet-care management platforms run on two fundamentally different pricing models, and matching the operation to the right model materially changes the total cost. Facility-based platforms (Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, PawLoyalty, ProPet, Kennel Connection) charge per-location monthly subscriptions custom-quoted by services scope and pet capacity, with most vendors quoting roughly $59 to $329 per location monthly across entry-to-mid tiers. Pricing scales linearly across multi-site groups, so a five-location operation pays roughly five times the single-location rate before enterprise consolidation discounts apply. In-home pet-sitting platforms (Time to Pet) charge staff-count-tiered subscriptions where pricing scales by walker count rather than by location count: $45/mo for 1 to 9 staff, $95/mo for 10 to 49 staff, $199/mo for 50-plus staff. The honest framework: model the operation's actual cost driver. Per-location pricing fits facilities where each location is the cost-center; staff-count pricing fits operators where each walker drives revenue.

In-home pet-sitting and facility boarding need different software

In-home pet-sitting operators and facility-based boarding operators face fundamentally different software needs, and the right pick depends on which side of the line the operation sits. Facility-based operations need cabin or kennel reservations (which pet sleeps where, when the boarding window opens and closes, kennel-cleaning rotation), daycare check-in and check-out tracking, grooming-appointment scheduling, customer-portal photo updates from facility cameras, and reservation engines that handle multi-night boarding bookings. In-home pet-sitting operations need walker-staff scheduling across dozens of homes daily, GPS-tracked visit logging that proves walks happened on time, customer-facing photo updates from each in-home visit, walker-payroll workflow that handles per-visit compensation, and route-optimisation that minimises travel time between visits. Time to Pet ships in-home pet-sitting workflow as primary surface; Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, PawLoyalty, ProPet, and Kennel Connection ship facility-boarding workflow as primary. The honest framework: weight the operation's primary service shape. In-home pet-sitting operators should pick Time to Pet; facility-based operators should pick from the six facility-based platforms.

Multi-services scope matters for facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming

Facility-based pet-care operations vary by services-scope coverage, and the right pick depends on which service lines the facility runs. Single-service facilities (boarding-only kennels, daycare-only doggie daycares, grooming-only salons) get adequate functionality from any platform in the lineup that ships the relevant service line. Multi-services facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming together need integrated scheduling that handles cross-service conflicts: a pet boarded for the night should not be double-booked for daycare check-in the same morning, and a grooming appointment scheduled during a boarding stay should auto-deduct from the boarding bill. Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, and Kennel Connection ship integrated boarding-plus-daycare-plus-grooming-plus-training workflow; PawLoyalty ships integrated boarding-plus-daycare-plus-grooming without training; ProPet ships integrated boarding-plus-daycare-plus-grooming. The honest framework: confirm services-scope coverage matches operation services lines before committing. Facilities running training classes alongside boarding need Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, or Kennel Connection; facilities skipping training can pick on broader factors.

Legacy facilities versus modern operations need different UX

Legacy boarding facilities running paper-based reservations or on-premise software for decades face different software-adoption needs than modern operations starting from scratch. Legacy facilities staff trained on familiar workflow patterns (paper kennel cards, desktop reservation software, phone-call booking) get more lift from platforms that preserve those patterns through the digital transition than from modern alternatives that require operational re-training. DaySmart Pet ships familiar UX patterns inherited from decades of pet-care software lineage since 1988; Kennel Connection ships cloud-migration continuity from on-premise software since 1992. Modern operations starting from scratch with younger staff hires get more lift from consumer-grade SaaS UX language. Gingr ships modern UX polish under Higher Logic platform investment since 2021; Time to Pet ships consumer-grade in-home pet-care UX since 2014. The honest framework: weight staff demographics and prior software experience. Legacy facilities should weight DaySmart Pet or Kennel Connection; modern operations should weight Gingr, Time to Pet, or PawLoyalty.

When to skip dedicated pet-care software entirely

Not every pet-care operation needs dedicated pet-care management software. Single-pet-sitter operations running fewer than 10 visits weekly, hobby-scale dog-walking operations running for friends and neighbours without scaled marketing, and pop-up pet-sitting arrangements during family vacations can typically run the operation through a generic small-business CRM (HoneyBook, Dubsado), a Stripe or PayPal invoicing relationship, and a Google Calendar or shared spreadsheet without paying for pet-care-specific features. Operations with fewer than 15 daily pets often handle reservations adequately through phone calls and paper kennel cards. The honest framework: dedicated pet-care software adds value when daily pet capacity exceeds roughly 20 pets, when multi-services scheduling becomes operationally load-bearing, when customer-portal communication volume justifies dedicated workflow, when GPS-tracked visit logging becomes necessary for liability or marketing reasons, when staff-payroll workflow requires structured per-visit or per-shift compensation, or when multi-site coordination requires central management. Below those thresholds, simpler general-purpose alternatives often fit better at meaningfully lower total cost.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

No. Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, and Kennel Connection all quote per-location monthly pricing through sales-call-led custom quotes that vary by services scope, pet capacity, contract length, and negotiation. Time to Pet publishes staff-count-tiered pricing publicly listed on the website. PawLoyalty and ProPet publish per-location monthly pricing publicly listed on their websites. Published rate cards are starting points rather than binding rates. The listed mid-points reflect monthly sticker pricing as of May 2026 and are subject to vendor changes; always check the vendor pricing page or request a custom quote before committing.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and head-term audience fit, specifically Gingr pinned first for mainstream all-in-one pet-care platform recognition with the deepest US facility-based installed base since 2011.

Why is Gingr ranked first when Time to Pet is cheaper and wins composite math?

Time to Pet at the entry staff-count monthly rate is the composite leader at neutral fitScore=7 (3.634 score), and we list Time to Pet third specifically for in-home pet-sitting and dog-walking operators. Gingr ranks first because the head-term reader searching for dog daycare and pet boarding software in 2026 is mostly a facility-based operator running brick-and-mortar boarding or doggie daycare, not an in-home pet-sitting operator. Time to Pet does not ship native boarding, daycare, grooming, or training infrastructure that facility operators need; the staff-count pricing advantage is irrelevant to the procurement shape. Both are correct answers depending on the operation shape.

How does Gingr compare to PetExec specifically for multi-site boarding groups?

Both serve multi-site boarding groups but optimise different dimensions. Gingr leads on consumer-grade UX polish since the Higher Logic acquisition in 2021 and broad services-scope coverage. PetExec leads on group-consolidation infrastructure depth across twenty-four years of enterprise-group feedback since 2002 and dedicated CSM relationships at the enterprise tier. Single-location facilities and small two-to-four-location groups typically prefer Gingr; ten-plus-location enterprise groups consolidating under one parent organisation usually prefer PetExec. Both quote per-location monthly contracts, so model location count and services scope against both quotes before signing.

Should I pick DaySmart Pet or Kennel Connection for a legacy facility migration?

Both serve legacy facility migration but optimise different dimensions. DaySmart Pet ships the longest US installed base since 1988 with familiar UX patterns inherited from earlier brand names like 123Pet, plus DaySmart Software platform-investment trajectory under PE ownership. Kennel Connection ships cloud-migration continuity since 1992 from the same Blue Crystal Software vendor that operates the on-premise software, with workflow patterns preserved across the desktop-to-cloud transition. Facilities migrating from non-Blue-Crystal on-premise software usually prefer DaySmart Pet for the broader installed-base familiarity; facilities already running Blue Crystal on-premise software prefer Kennel Connection for the cloud-migration continuity from the same vendor.

Can I switch pet-care platforms mid-year without losing customer data?

Yes, but with friction. All seven picks support customer-data, reservation-history, and payment-history export; the difficulty is reimporting customer profiles, pet records, vaccination history, customer-portal credentials, and reservation continuity into a new platform without breaking continuity for active bookings. Most facilities run parallel systems through a transition month for migration. The honest framework: switching pet-care platforms mid-season is genuinely disruptive because customer-portal credentials, reservation continuity, and vaccination-record handling all matter for active bookings. Plan migration to align with low-occupancy windows (typically January and February for boarding, September for daycare) to avoid peak-season cutover risk.

How do I model annual cost across these vendors at typical 50-pet daily volume?

Rough mid-points for a US single-location pet-care facility running 50 pets daily: Gingr Standard $1,188/yr per location; PetExec Standard $1,548/yr per location; Time to Pet Standard $540/yr for 1-9 staff (in-home only, not facility comparable); DaySmart Pet Lite $708/yr per location (entry tier); PawLoyalty Standard $948/yr per location; ProPet Standard $708/yr per location; Kennel Connection Cloud Standard $1,068/yr per location. ProPet Standard and DaySmart Pet Lite tie cheapest at this volume. Most facilities running boarding plus daycare plus grooming together select the Plus or Pro tier for marketing and integrations, raising annual cost to $1,548-$2,148/yr per location.

What about Connecteam, Paw Partner, GoPet AI, Doggie Dashboard, and other tools not in the lineup?

Connecteam is a generalist staff-and-scheduling platform that markets to dog daycare among other small-business categories, lighter on pet-care-specific workflow than dedicated alternatives. Paw Partner is a founder-owned platform built by 150-pet-daily facility operators competing with PawLoyalty on indie-operator focus. GoPet AI is a smaller venture-backed entrant focused on AI-assisted reservation workflow for 5-to-50-run kennels. Anolla is a mobile-first PWA-based platform with European focus. Doggie Dashboard offers a free tier competing with ProPet on cost-conscious entry. Easy Busy Pets and Precise Pet Care round out the alternatives outside the seven-pick lineup.

How does customer-portal communication vary across these platforms?

Customer-portal communication ships at different depth across the lineup. Gingr, PetExec, DaySmart Pet, PawLoyalty, ProPet, and Kennel Connection ship full customer-portal experience with reservation booking, photo updates from facility cameras, payment history, and two-way messaging. Time to Pet ships in-home customer-portal experience with GPS-tracked visit logging, walker-photo updates, and per-visit payment receipts. The honest framework: facilities running active customer-engagement with daily photo sharing should weight Gingr or Time to Pet; facilities with lighter engagement needs can pick PetExec or Kennel Connection.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly, and immediately when major shifts hit. Major triggers in this category: Gingr pricing or post-Higher-Logic-acquisition product changes, PetExec pricing or product updates, Time to Pet pricing or staff-count-tier changes, DaySmart Pet pricing or DaySmart Software platform-investment changes, PawLoyalty pricing or feature updates, ProPet pricing or services-scope expansion, Kennel Connection pricing or Blue Crystal cloud-migration changes, any new entrant materially shifting the category, and any major regulatory changes affecting pet-care liability, vaccination tracking, or USDA Animal Welfare Act enforcement for facility-based operations.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Dog Daycare and Pet Boarding Software you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides