Snyk
9.6/10Save $3,600/yrBest developer-first DevSecOps with broadest IDE plugin coverage
Developer-first DevSecOps brand leader with broad IDE plugin coverage and Snyk Code on Team.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | What you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Free for individuals with 200 SCA tests, 100 SAST tests, and 100 container tests per month. |
| Team | $25.00/mo | $300.00/yr | Per-contributor monthly with higher test limits, Snyk Code, and Slack alerts. |
| Enterprise | $50.00/mo | $600.00/yr | Custom quote with SSO, RBAC, custom integrations, and dedicated CSM. |
Snyk is the developer-first DevSecOps platform for engineering teams whose evaluation defaults to the scanner with the broadest IDE plugin coverage and a Free tier that covers real shift-left work. Founded 2015 in London and Tel Aviv, Snyk built around the thesis that AppSec scanning should ship as a developer tool with first-class IDE integration rather than as a security-team console.
Three tiers serve three buyers. Free covers individuals with 200 SCA, 100 SAST, and 100 container tests per month against GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Team is per-contributor monthly at the entry rate with higher test limits, Snyk Code SAST, IaC scanning, and Slack alerts. Enterprise opens SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM with SOC 2 attestation.
The load-bearing wedge is IDE coverage plus a Free tier that covers real engineering work. Where Checkmarx and Wiz ship enterprise consoles assuming a dedicated AppSec team, Snyk ships in the IDE so individual developers see vulnerabilities at the moment of authoring; for teams without dedicated AppSec headcount, the shift-left ergonomics matter. The catch is per-contributor pricing scales linearly with team size; past 100 contributors, Aikido or Trivy plus a SaaS dashboard can run materially cheaper.
Pros
- Broadest IDE plugin coverage among DevSecOps since 2015
- Free tier covers 200 SCA + 100 SAST + 100 container tests per month
- Snyk Code SAST included from Team tier upward
- GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket integration plus full CI/CD pipeline coverage
- SOC 2 attested with SSO, RBAC, dedicated CSM on Enterprise
Cons
- Per-contributor pricing scales linearly past 100 engineers
- No agentless cloud runtime posture; CNAPP coverage lags Wiz and Orca
Best for: Engineering teams under 100 contributors wanting developer-first DevSecOps with IDE-native shift-left ergonomics.
- Coverage
- 9
- Pipeline latency
- 9
- Developer overhead
- 10
- Value
- 9
- Support
- 9