Skip to content

Best DevSecOps Scannings of 2026

Updated · 7 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Developer-first DevSecOps brand leader with broad IDE plugin coverage and Snyk Code on Team.

BEST OVERALL9.6/10Save $3,600/yr

Snyk

Developer-first DevSecOps brand leader with broad IDE plugin coverage and Snyk Code on Team.

Free tier with 200 SCA tests; Team 14-day trial

How it stacks up

  • Free 200 SCA tests/mo

    vs Aikido SMB bundle

  • Team $25/contributor/mo

    vs Checkmarx enterprise SAST

  • Enterprise SSO + RBAC

    vs Wiz cloud posture

#2
Aikido Security5.8/10

From $350/mo

View
#3
Trivy (Aqua Security)4.3/10

From $1,500/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingFreeScore
1SnykBest developer-first DevSecOps with broadest IDE plugin coverage$25.00/mo9.6/10
2Aikido SecurityBest SMB consolidator with five scan types bundled in one Free tier$350.00/mo5.8/10
3Trivy (Aqua Security)Best open-source CLI with container, IaC, and SBOM scanning$1,500.00/mo4.3/10
4GitGuardianBest secrets-detection specialist with 350+ secret types and honeytokens$249.00/mo4.1/10
5WizBest enterprise CNAPP with agentless posture and Fortune 500 references$15,000.00/mo3.8/10
6Checkmarx OneBest enterprise SAST incumbent with regulated-industry depth and on-prem option$5,000.00/mo3.7/10
7Orca SecurityBest agentless CNAPP challenger with CIEM and DSPM bundled on Enterprise$10,000.00/mo3.5/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

If You are an engineering team 50-200 contributors with dedicated AppSec ownershipSnykSnyk ships IDE-native shift-left scanning with the broadest plugin coverage; Free 200 SCA tests; Team per-contributor monthly; Enterprise SSO and RBAC.If You are an SMB engineering team under 100 contributors without dedicated AppSec headcountAikido SecurityAikido bundles five scan types in one Free tier (2 users, 10 repos); Basic flat monthly avoids per-contributor surprises; Scale unlocks unlimited repos.If Your AppSec budget centers on leaked-credential prevention as the load-bearing disciplineGitGuardianGitGuardian ships 350+ secret types with depth multi-purpose scanners miss; Free for 25 users on public repos; honeytokens on Enterprise.If You are a Fortune 500 security team and the procurement question is which CNAPP rather than which scannerWizWiz ships agentless multi-cloud security posture with the broadest Fortune 500 reference base since 2020; Enterprise bundles Wiz Code plus Wiz Defend.If Your DevSecOps posture starts from a free open-source CLI before any SaaS procurementTrivy (Aqua Security)Trivy ships Apache 2 CLI with container, IaC, SBOM, and secrets scanning at zero cost; static binary, GitHub Action, Helm chart; Aqua Cloud is optional.If You are a regulated-industry enterprise needing on-prem SAST with deepest financial-services reference depthCheckmarx OneCheckmarx ships enterprise SAST with on-prem deployment and the broadest regulated-industry reference base since 2006; custom-rule authoring on Pro.

Compare all 7 picks

Free tierTop spec
#1Snyk9.6/10$50.00/mo$600.00/yrSave $3,600/yrFree 200 SCA tests/mo
#2Aikido Security5.8/10$899.00/mo$9,588.00/yr$6,588/yr moreFree 2 users + 10 repos
#3Trivy (Aqua Security)4.3/10$8,000.00/mo$96,000.00/yr$91,800/yr moreOpen Source CLI free
#4GitGuardian4.1/10$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yr$13,800/yr moreFree 25 users + public
#5Wiz3.8/10$50,000.00/mo$600,000.00/yr$595,800/yr moreCloud Security ~$100k/yr
#6Checkmarx One3.7/10$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yr$55,800/yr moreStandard ~$30k-$80k/yr
#7Orca Security3.5/10$10,000.00/mo$120,000.00/yr$115,800/yr moreStandard ~$60k-$200k/yr
#1

Snyk

9.6/10Save $3,600/yr

Best developer-first DevSecOps with broadest IDE plugin coverage

Developer-first DevSecOps brand leader with broad IDE plugin coverage and Snyk Code on Team.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree for individuals with 200 SCA tests, 100 SAST tests, and 100 container tests per month.
Team$25.00/mo$300.00/yrPer-contributor monthly with higher test limits, Snyk Code, and Slack alerts.
Enterprise$50.00/mo$600.00/yrCustom quote with SSO, RBAC, custom integrations, and dedicated CSM.

Snyk is the developer-first DevSecOps platform for engineering teams whose evaluation defaults to the scanner with the broadest IDE plugin coverage and a Free tier that covers real shift-left work. Founded 2015 in London and Tel Aviv, Snyk built around the thesis that AppSec scanning should ship as a developer tool with first-class IDE integration rather than as a security-team console.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Free covers individuals with 200 SCA, 100 SAST, and 100 container tests per month against GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Team is per-contributor monthly at the entry rate with higher test limits, Snyk Code SAST, IaC scanning, and Slack alerts. Enterprise opens SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM with SOC 2 attestation.

The load-bearing wedge is IDE coverage plus a Free tier that covers real engineering work. Where Checkmarx and Wiz ship enterprise consoles assuming a dedicated AppSec team, Snyk ships in the IDE so individual developers see vulnerabilities at the moment of authoring; for teams without dedicated AppSec headcount, the shift-left ergonomics matter. The catch is per-contributor pricing scales linearly with team size; past 100 contributors, Aikido or Trivy plus a SaaS dashboard can run materially cheaper.

Pros

  • Broadest IDE plugin coverage among DevSecOps since 2015
  • Free tier covers 200 SCA + 100 SAST + 100 container tests per month
  • Snyk Code SAST included from Team tier upward
  • GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket integration plus full CI/CD pipeline coverage
  • SOC 2 attested with SSO, RBAC, dedicated CSM on Enterprise

Cons

  • Per-contributor pricing scales linearly past 100 engineers
  • No agentless cloud runtime posture; CNAPP coverage lags Wiz and Orca
Free 200 SCA tests/moTeam $25/contributor/moEnterprise SSO + RBACFree tier with 200 SCA tests; Team 14-day trial

Best for: Engineering teams under 100 contributors wanting developer-first DevSecOps with IDE-native shift-left ergonomics.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
9
Developer overhead
10
Value
9
Support
9
#2

Aikido Security

5.8/10$6,588/yr more

Best SMB consolidator with five scan types bundled in one Free tier

SMB consolidator DevSecOps bundling SCA, SAST, IaC, secrets, and cloud on Free.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree for up to 2 users with 10 repositories and bundled SCA, SAST, IaC, and secrets.
Basic$350.00/mo$3,768.00/yrFlat monthly for 10 users and 25 repos with AI AutoFix and custom rules.
Scale$899.00/mo$9,588.00/yrUnlimited repos, cloud accounts, and container scanning with SOC 2 plus ISO 27001.
Enterprise$2,500.00/mo$30,000.00/yrCustom quote with SSO, RBAC, custom integrations, and dedicated CSM.

Aikido Security is the SMB consolidator for engineering teams whose deployment requires SCA, SAST, IaC, secrets, and cloud posture in a single product rather than five vendor relationships. Founded 2022 in Ghent, Aikido built around the thesis that DevSecOps should ship as a unified product where every scan type comes from one console rather than six SKU purchases plus integration glue.

Four tiers cover the lifecycle. Free covers 2 users and 10 repos plus 50 cloud accounts with bundled SCA, SAST, IaC, and secrets. Basic is the entry flat monthly with 10 users and 25 repos plus AI AutoFix and custom rules. Scale unlocks unlimited repos, cloud accounts, and container scanning with SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 attestation. Enterprise opens SSO, RBAC, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is bundling versus best-of-breed. Where Snyk requires multiple SKU purchases stacked together and GitGuardian only does secrets, Aikido ships every scan type in one product at SMB-friendly pricing; for teams under 100 contributors who would otherwise stitch four scanners together, the consolidation matters. The catch is the smaller community than Snyk plus the younger product without the Fortune 500 reference base of legacy AppSec incumbents.

Pros

  • Bundles SCA + SAST + IaC + secrets + cloud in one Free tier
  • Flat-monthly pricing avoids per-contributor surprises at SMB scale
  • AI AutoFix from Basic tier upward
  • SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 on Scale tier
  • Single console replaces 4-5 vendor relationships at SMB scale

Cons

  • Smaller community than Snyk and legacy AppSec incumbents
  • Younger product (2022) without Fortune 500 reference base
Free 2 users + 10 reposBasic $314/mo annualScale unlimited reposFree tier 2 users + 10 repos; Basic 14-day trial

Best for: SMB engineering teams under 100 contributors wanting one bundled DevSecOps product instead of four point tools.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
9
Developer overhead
10
Value
10
Support
8
#3

Trivy (Aqua Security)

4.3/10$91,800/yr more

Best open-source CLI with container, IaC, and SBOM scanning

Open-source DevSecOps CLI (Apache 2, Aqua Security maintained) for containers, IaC, and SBOMs.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Open SourceFreeApache 2 licensed CLI for container, IaC, and SBOM scanning with GitHub Action.
Aqua Cloud$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yrManaged Trivy with Aqua platform, cloud workload protection, and standard support.
Enterprise$8,000.00/mo$96,000.00/yrAqua Enterprise with multi-region, CWPP, and dedicated CSM.

Trivy is the open-source CLI scanner for engineering teams whose AppSec strategy starts from a free CLI rather than a SaaS dashboard. Released 2019 by Aqua Security and licensed Apache 2, Trivy built around the thesis that container, IaC, and SBOM scanning should ship as a single static binary that drops into any CI pipeline rather than as a vendor-locked SaaS-only product.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Open Source covers the full Trivy CLI free with container, IaC, SBOM, and secrets scanning. Aqua Cloud is the optional managed Trivy with cloud workload protection at the entry annual rate. Enterprise opens Aqua Enterprise with multi-region deployment, CWPP, and dedicated CSM.

The load-bearing wedge is the open-source-free CLI plus the optional managed upgrade path. Where Snyk and Aikido ship SaaS-only and Wiz requires enterprise contracts, Trivy runs as a static binary at zero cost in any pipeline; for teams whose AppSec posture starts from a free CLI before any procurement conversation, the open-source license matters. The catch is no managed dashboard at the free tier; without Aqua Cloud you build your own findings aggregation, and the typical-tier composite math reflects the Aqua Enterprise paid fallback rather than the OSS reality.

Pros

  • Apache 2 licensed CLI with container, IaC, SBOM, and secrets scanning
  • Static binary plus GitHub Action plus Helm chart deployment
  • Aqua Security backing for managed upgrade path
  • Self-hostable for compliance-bound deployments
  • Strong community adoption among Kubernetes-native teams

Cons

  • No managed dashboard at the free tier; aggregation is your problem
  • Typical-tier composite math reflects Aqua Enterprise paid fallback, not OSS reality
Open Source CLI freeAqua Cloud ~$10k-$30k/yrApache 2 licensedOpen Source CLI free; Aqua Cloud demo on request

Best for: Engineering teams whose DevSecOps posture starts from a free open-source CLI before any SaaS procurement.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
9
Developer overhead
8
Value
10
Support
7
#4

GitGuardian

4.1/10$13,800/yr more

Best secrets-detection specialist with 350+ secret types and honeytokens

Secrets-detection specialist with 350+ secret types, honeytokens, and ggshield CLI on Enterprise.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeFree for up to 25 users with public repository monitoring and remediation playbooks.
Business$249.00/mo$2,988.00/yrFlat monthly for 50 contributors with private repos, 350+ secret types, and audit logs.
Enterprise$1,500.00/mo$18,000.00/yrCustom quote with honeytokens, ggshield CLI, SOC 2, and custom integrations.

GitGuardian is the secrets-detection specialist for engineering teams whose evaluation centers on leaked credential prevention as the primary AppSec discipline rather than as one finding among many. Founded 2017 in Paris, GitGuardian built around the thesis that secrets in source code, build artifacts, container images, and Slack messages deserve a dedicated scanner rather than a generic regex sweep bolted onto a multi-purpose platform.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Free covers 25 users with public repository monitoring, secret detection, and remediation playbooks. Business is flat monthly for 50 contributors with private repos, 350+ secret types, Slack and Jira integration, and audit logs. Enterprise opens honeytokens, ggshield CLI, SOC 2, and custom integrations.

The load-bearing wedge is secrets-detection depth. Where Snyk and Aikido cover secrets as one finding type among SCA, SAST, and IaC, GitGuardian ships 350+ secret types with detector accuracy that catches credentials multi-purpose scanners miss, plus honeytokens that detect attacker reconnaissance against fake credentials embedded in repos; for organizations whose AppSec budget centers on preventing the next credential-leak headline, the specialist depth matters. The catch is narrow scope; if your roadmap also needs SCA, SAST, and IaC, you still need a second scanner.

Pros

  • 350+ secret types with detector accuracy beyond multi-purpose scanners
  • Honeytokens detect attacker reconnaissance against fake credentials
  • Free tier for 25 users with public repository monitoring
  • ggshield CLI for pre-commit and pre-push hooks on Enterprise
  • GDPR-aligned with French jurisdiction and EU data residency

Cons

  • Secrets-only scope; SCA, SAST, IaC need a second scanner
  • Smaller community than Snyk for AppSec discussions and integrations
Free 25 users + publicBusiness $249/mo flatHoneytokens on EnterpriseFree tier 25 users; Business 14-day trial

Best for: Engineering teams whose AppSec budget centers on leaked-credential prevention as the load-bearing discipline.

Coverage
10
Pipeline latency
9
Developer overhead
9
Value
9
Support
9
#5

Wiz

3.8/10$595,800/yr more

Best enterprise CNAPP with agentless posture and Fortune 500 references

Enterprise CNAPP market leader with agentless cloud posture, Wiz Code, and Wiz Defend.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Cloud Security$15,000.00/mo$180,000.00/yrCustom quote with cloud security posture, vulnerability, secrets, and IAM coverage.
Enterprise$50,000.00/mo$600,000.00/yrMulti-cloud and cloud workload protection with Wiz Code and Wiz Defend.

Wiz is the enterprise CNAPP for Fortune 500 organizations whose deployment requires multi-cloud security posture management rather than CI/CD pipeline scanning as the primary discipline. Founded 2020 in Tel Aviv by Microsoft Cloud alumni, Wiz built around the thesis that cloud security should ship as agentless full-stack visibility across AWS, Azure, and GCP rather than as workload-by-workload agent installs.

Two tiers serve two buyers. Cloud Security covers cloud security posture, vulnerability, secrets, and IAM coverage at custom enterprise quote. Enterprise opens multi-cloud workload protection plus Wiz Code (CI/CD scanning) and Wiz Defend (cloud detection and response). Pricing is custom-quoted with no public tier visibility; expect 20-40 percent variance based on cloud account count and negotiation leverage.

The load-bearing wedge is agentless cloud posture plus Fortune 500 reference base. Where Snyk and Checkmarx ship pipeline-stage AppSec and Aikido bundles cloud posture into the SMB lane, Wiz ships cloud-runtime posture as the primary discipline with the broadest Fortune 500 reference base in CNAPP; for enterprise security teams where the procurement question is which CNAPP rather than which scanner, Wiz is usually the default. The catch is enterprise-contract-only pricing with no public visibility plus the lack of a Free tier.

Pros

  • Agentless cloud security posture across AWS, Azure, and GCP
  • Broadest Fortune 500 CNAPP reference base since 2020
  • Wiz Code adds CI/CD pipeline scanning on Enterprise
  • Wiz Defend adds cloud detection and response on Enterprise
  • Multi-cloud workload protection bundled on Enterprise

Cons

  • Enterprise-contract-only with no Free tier for evaluation
  • Pricing visibility intentionally low; six-figure entry quote
Cloud Security ~$100k/yrEnterprise multi-cloudAgentless full-stackDemo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: Fortune 500 security teams whose procurement question is which CNAPP rather than which pipeline scanner.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
9
Developer overhead
8
Value
7
Support
9
#6

Checkmarx One

3.7/10$55,800/yr more

Best enterprise SAST incumbent with regulated-industry depth and on-prem option

Enterprise SAST incumbent with regulated-industry reference depth and on-prem option since 2006.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$5,000.00/mo$60,000.00/yrCustom quote with SAST, SCA, and container scanning across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Pro$15,000.00/mo$180,000.00/yrIaC, API security, DAST, and custom integrations on top of Standard.
Enterprise$30,000.00/mo$360,000.00/yrMulti-region with dedicated CSM, SOC 2, and audit and compliance.

Checkmarx One is the enterprise SAST incumbent for organizations whose deployment requires the deepest regulated-industry reference base and an on-prem option for compliance frameworks where SaaS-only scanning is not feasible. Founded 2006 in Tel Aviv and currently in the Hellman & Friedman portfolio, Checkmarx built the canonical enterprise SAST scanner with case authoring depth that newer dev-friendly competitors lack.

Three tiers serve three buyers. Standard covers SAST plus SCA plus container scanning across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. Pro adds IaC, API security, DAST, and custom integrations. Enterprise opens multi-region, dedicated CSM, SOC 2, and audit and compliance reporting.

The load-bearing wedge is regulated-industry SAST depth plus the on-prem option. Where Snyk and Aikido ship SaaS-only and Wiz centers on cloud runtime posture, Checkmarx ships enterprise SAST with on-prem deployment, the broadest regulated-industry reference base in financial services and healthcare, and case authoring tooling that lets security teams build custom detection rules; for compliance-bound deployments where SaaS scanning fails procurement, the on-prem option matters. The catch is the enterprise-contract pricing with no Free tier plus the older console UX that lags Snyk's IDE-native ergonomics.

Pros

  • Deepest regulated-industry reference base in financial services and healthcare
  • On-prem deployment for compliance-bound environments
  • SAST plus SCA plus container scanning bundled from Standard
  • IaC, API security, and DAST on Pro tier
  • Custom detection rule authoring for security-team-built rules

Cons

  • Enterprise-contract pricing with no Free tier for evaluation
  • Older console UX lags Snyk IDE-native ergonomics
Standard ~$30k-$80k/yrOn-prem optionRegulated-industry depthDemo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: Regulated-industry enterprises in financial services and healthcare with on-prem requirements and compliance procurement.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
8
Developer overhead
7
Value
7
Support
9
#7

Orca Security

3.5/10$115,800/yr more

Best agentless CNAPP challenger with CIEM and DSPM bundled on Enterprise

Agentless CNAPP challenger with CIEM and DSPM bundled on Enterprise since 2019.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
Standard$10,000.00/mo$120,000.00/yrCustom quote for cloud security platform with agentless cloud scanning across multi-cloud.
Enterprise$35,000.00/mo$420,000.00/yrMulti-cloud workload, IAM, CIEM, and DSPM with priority support.

Orca Security is the agentless CNAPP challenger for enterprise security teams whose evaluation runs Wiz alongside Orca as a brand-recognition counterpoint with deeper CIEM and DSPM coverage. Founded 2019 in Tel Aviv by Check Point alumni, Orca built around the thesis that cloud security should ship as agentless side-scanning of cloud workloads rather than agent-based instrumentation, with the side-scan pattern as the primary primitive that competitors later copied.

Two tiers serve two buyers. Standard covers cloud security platform with agentless multi-cloud scanning across AWS, Azure, and GCP at the entry annual rate. Enterprise opens multi-cloud workload protection plus IAM coverage plus CIEM and DSPM bundled, with dedicated CSM and priority support.

The load-bearing wedge is the side-scan pattern plus CIEM and DSPM depth. Where Wiz also ships agentless and CI/CD scanning together, Orca differentiates on CIEM (cloud infrastructure entitlement management) and DSPM (data security posture management) bundled into the Enterprise tier rather than as add-ons; for security teams whose evaluation centers on entitlement sprawl and sensitive-data discovery alongside vulnerability posture, the bundling matters. The catch is the smaller Fortune 500 reference base than Wiz plus the same enterprise-contract-only pricing model without a free evaluation tier.

Pros

  • Agentless side-scan pattern across multi-cloud
  • CIEM and DSPM bundled into Enterprise tier
  • Multi-cloud workload protection without agent installs
  • Strong financial services and healthcare reference base
  • Cloud security platform consolidates 4+ point tools at enterprise scale

Cons

  • Smaller Fortune 500 reference base than Wiz
  • Enterprise-contract-only with no Free tier for evaluation
Standard ~$60k-$200k/yrCIEM + DSPM bundledSide-scan agentlessDemo and proof-of-concept on request

Best for: Enterprise security teams whose evaluation centers on CIEM entitlement sprawl and DSPM sensitive-data discovery alongside CNAPP.

Coverage
9
Pipeline latency
8
Developer overhead
8
Value
7
Support
8

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

We weight price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15. Snyk wins composite at 9.150 and brand recognition for developer-first DevSecOps; no pinning for picks[0]. Wiz pinned #4 from composite tail for enterprise CNAPP brand recognition. Trivy typical-tier overshoots at the Aqua Enterprise layer-3 because the CLI itself is free.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best developer-first scanning

Snyk

Read the full review →

Best secrets scanning

GitGuardian

Read the full review →

Best SMB consolidator scanning

Aikido Security

Read the full review →

Best enterprise CNAPP

Wiz

Read the full review →

Best open-source scanner

Trivy (Aqua Security)

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Already in picks (sixth). Worth flagging the regulated-industry depth; Checkmarx ships the deepest financial-services and healthcare SAST reference base with on-prem option.

Already in picks (seventh). Worth flagging the side-scan pattern; Orca pioneered agentless side-scan cloud security and ships CIEM plus DSPM bundled into Enterprise rather than as add-ons.

Already in picks (third). Worth flagging honeytokens; GitGuardian ships fake credentials embedded in repos that detect attacker reconnaissance, which multi-purpose scanners do not match.

Already in picks (fifth). Worth flagging the Apache 2 license; Trivy ships as a single static binary that drops into any CI pipeline at zero cost, and the Aqua Cloud paid tier is genuinely optional.

How to choose your DevSecOps Scanning

Seven product shapes compete for one head term

The 'best DevSecOps scanning' search covers seven distinct shapes. Developer-first mainstream (Snyk) targets engineering teams under 100 contributors wanting IDE-native shift-left scanning with broad community. SMB consolidator (Aikido) targets SMB teams wanting one bundled product instead of four point tools. Secrets specialist (GitGuardian) targets organizations whose AppSec budget centers on credential-leak prevention as the load-bearing discipline. Enterprise CNAPP (Wiz) targets Fortune 500 security teams whose procurement question is which CNAPP. Open-source CLI (Trivy) targets teams whose AppSec posture starts from a free static binary. Enterprise SAST incumbent (Checkmarx) targets regulated-industry deployments with on-prem requirements. Agentless CNAPP challenger (Orca Security) targets enterprises whose evaluation centers on CIEM and DSPM alongside CNAPP. The honest framework: identify your team scale, your compliance posture, and your bundling-versus-best-of-breed preference.

Free tiers separate developer-friendly from enterprise-contract-only

Free tiers separate the developer-friendly platforms from enterprise-contract-only. The cap landscape across the seven picks: Snyk Free covers 200 SCA plus 100 SAST plus 100 container tests per month for individuals. GitGuardian Free covers 25 users with public repository monitoring. Aikido Free covers 2 users plus 10 repos plus 50 cloud accounts with bundled SCA, SAST, IaC, and secrets. Trivy Open Source covers the full CLI with container, IaC, SBOM, and secrets scanning under Apache 2. Wiz, Checkmarx, and Orca Security require enterprise contracts with no free evaluation tier. The honest framework: for engineering teams under 25 contributors evaluating DevSecOps adoption, free tiers (Snyk, GitGuardian, Aikido, Trivy) are the rational entry. Enterprise-contract-only platforms make sense once headcount exceeds 100 and the procurement budget supports six-figure annual contracts.

Pipeline scanning and cloud runtime posture are different disciplines

Pipeline scanning (SCA, SAST, IaC, secrets) and cloud runtime posture (CSPM, CIEM, DSPM) are different disciplines despite vendors marketing both. Pipeline-stage scanning catches vulnerabilities before deployment and lives in the developer-first lane (Snyk, Aikido, Checkmarx, GitGuardian, Trivy). Cloud runtime posture catches drift after deployment and lives in the CNAPP lane (Wiz, Orca, plus the cloud-posture features in Snyk Cloud and Aikido Scale). The honest framework: pipeline scanning is owned by the engineering team and runs in CI/CD; cloud posture is owned by the cloud security team and runs against AWS, Azure, and GCP APIs. Most modern security programs need both, but they are different SKU purchases at most vendors. Bundling them under one platform (Aikido at SMB scale, Wiz Code plus Wiz Defend at enterprise scale) is the 2026 trend; best-of-breed stacking remains common.

Bundling versus best-of-breed is the load-bearing decision

Bundling versus best-of-breed is the load-bearing decision for SMB and mid-market procurement in 2026. Aikido bundles SCA, SAST, IaC, secrets, and cloud in one Free tier where Snyk requires Snyk Open Source, Snyk Code, Snyk IaC, and Snyk Cloud stacked together. At SMB scale, Aikido Basic covers 10 users at the entry flat monthly rate; the equivalent Snyk stack at 10 contributors runs materially higher per month plus integration glue. Best-of-breed wins when the team has dedicated AppSec headcount, scanner-type depth matters more than consolidation, and the budget supports the premium. Bundling wins when the team lacks AppSec headcount, one console is lighter than four, and SMB pricing math runs cheaper. The honest framework: under 50 contributors defaults to bundling (Aikido); over 100 contributors with AppSec headcount defaults to best-of-breed (Snyk plus GitGuardian plus Trivy plus a CNAPP).

When to pay for a CNAPP versus pipeline-stage scanning alone

CNAPP (Wiz, Orca Security, Aikido Scale, Snyk Cloud) is not a substitute for pipeline-stage scanning. CNAPP catches drift after deployment; pipeline scanning catches vulnerabilities before deployment. The honest framework: pay for pipeline scanning first because shift-left economics dominate; pay for CNAPP second once cloud workload count exceeds the budget for incidents you cannot catch in CI/CD. CNAPP makes sense when (1) cloud workload count exceeds 100 across multi-cloud, (2) sensitive-data discovery (DSPM) and entitlement management (CIEM) are procurement-driven priorities, (3) the security team owns cloud posture as a separate discipline from pipeline AppSec. Pipeline scanning alone is fine when (1) cloud footprint fits a single account or region, (2) drift detection is handled by Terraform plan diffs and infrastructure-as-code review, (3) the engineering team owns both AppSec and cloud security under one roadmap. Plan to revisit this decision quarterly as cloud footprint grows.

When Snyk wins versus Aikido versus Wiz by team scale

Snyk versus Aikido versus Wiz is the load-bearing decision for DevSecOps scanning in 2026. Snyk wins when the team has 50-200 contributors with dedicated AppSec ownership, IDE-native ergonomics matter more than bundling, and the Free tier supports proof-of-concept before per-contributor procurement. Aikido wins when the team is under 100 contributors without dedicated AppSec headcount, bundling five scan types in one Free tier replaces four vendor relationships, and flat-monthly pricing avoids per-contributor surprises. Wiz wins when the security organization is Fortune 500 with multi-cloud workload count above 1,000, the procurement question is which CNAPP rather than which scanner, and cloud-runtime posture is the primary discipline. The honest framework: developer-first-mid-market defaults to Snyk; SMB-bundle-first defaults to Aikido; enterprise-cloud-runtime-first defaults to Wiz.

Frequently asked questions

Are these prices guaranteed not to change?

DevSecOps pricing is custom-quoted for nearly all enterprise tiers; figures here are industry estimates as of May 2026. Snyk Team, GitGuardian Business, and Aikido Basic/Scale have public flat pricing. Wiz, Checkmarx, and Orca Security custom-quote with 20-40 percent variance based on cloud account count and negotiation leverage. Free tiers are stable across Snyk, GitGuardian, Aikido, and Trivy. Get quotes from three vendors.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any of these picks?

We track which picks have approved affiliate programs in our database, and the FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which ones currently have a click-tracking partnership. Affiliate revenue does not change ranking. The composite math runs against the same weights for every pick regardless of partnership; if a higher-paying vendor scores worse, it ranks worse. The picks-array order reflects editorial pinning around brand recognition and audience fit.

Why is Snyk ranked first instead of Wiz or Checkmarx?

Snyk leads brand recognition for developer-first DevSecOps with the broadest IDE plugin coverage since 2015 and uniquely matches the best-developer-first-scanning tile. Snyk also wins composite math via the cheapest paid tier compared to enterprise-contract-only Wiz, Checkmarx, and Orca Security. The head-term reader for this query is mostly an engineering team evaluating shift-left scanning, not a Fortune 500 org evaluating CNAPP; that procurement reads /best/cybersecurity-edr instead.

Should I pick Snyk or Aikido?

Pick by team scale and AppSec ownership. Engineering teams 50-200 contributors with dedicated AppSec ownership default to Snyk for IDE-native ergonomics and the broadest community. SMB teams under 100 contributors without dedicated AppSec headcount default to Aikido for bundled SCA plus SAST plus IaC plus secrets plus cloud in one Free tier. The decision tree: dedicated-AppSec-mid-market defaults to Snyk; SMB-no-AppSec-headcount defaults to Aikido for the consolidation math.

When does GitGuardian beat a multi-purpose scanner like Snyk or Aikido?

When secrets-detection is the load-bearing AppSec discipline. GitGuardian ships 350+ secret types with detector accuracy that catches credentials multi-purpose scanners miss, plus honeytokens that detect attacker reconnaissance. For organizations whose AppSec budget centers on preventing the next credential-leak headline, the specialist depth matters. For multi-purpose AppSec scope, Snyk or Aikido cover secrets adequately as one finding type among many.

Why aren't Semgrep, Mend (formerly WhiteSource), or Veracode in the picks?

Semgrep is a strong open-source SAST competitor to Snyk Code, but the developer-first tile goes to Snyk and the open-source CLI tile goes to Trivy. Mend (formerly WhiteSource) is a reasonable SCA competitor but lacks the bundling depth of Aikido. Veracode ships enterprise SAST plus DAST plus SCA but the enterprise-SAST tile goes to Checkmarx with deeper regulated-industry references. All three are reasonable for stack-driven RFPs.

How do I choose between Wiz and Orca Security for CNAPP?

Pick by reference base versus CIEM-DSPM depth. Wiz wins when Fortune 500 references drive the RFP and Wiz Code plus Wiz Defend bundling on Enterprise consolidates pipeline plus runtime under one platform. Orca wins when CIEM and DSPM are explicit procurement priorities, the side-scan pattern matches the architectural preference, and Orca enterprise pricing comes in lower at equivalent cloud-account scope. Both ship agentless multi-cloud; differentiation lives at bundle and reference-base level.

How hard is it to switch DevSecOps scanners later?

Painful but not catastrophic. Migrating DevSecOps requires reauthoring custom rules, rebuilding CI/CD pipeline integrations, and re-baselining false-positive triage. Snyk, Checkmarx, GitGuardian, and Aikido use different rule formats; switching pipeline scanners typically takes one to three months. CNAPP migration runs three to six months because cloud-account onboarding and policy reauthoring are heavier. Plan migration as a quarter-long project, not a sprint.

When does open-source Trivy beat paid SaaS scanners?

When the team prefers self-hosting over SaaS dashboards and has the capacity to build findings aggregation. Trivy CLI is genuinely free under Apache 2 and runs in any CI pipeline as a static binary; for Kubernetes-native teams already running open-source security tooling, it fits the operating model. The catch is no managed dashboard at the free tier; without Aqua Cloud or a self-built aggregator, outputs become noise. For teams without dashboard capacity, Snyk or Aikido are the rational entry.

When does this guide get updated?

We aim to refresh /best/ guides quarterly when there are no major shifts, and immediately when there are. Major triggers: vendor pricing changes, Wiz IPO discussions reshaping pricing visibility, Checkmarx portfolio strategy shifts, Aikido funding rounds reshaping SMB consolidator economics, Aqua Security strategy around Trivy commercialization, GitGuardian honeytokens pricing visibility. The lastReviewed date reflects the most recent editorial sweep.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the DevSecOps Scanning you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides