Skip to content

Best Copy-Trading Platforms of 2026

Updated · 4 picks · live pricing · affiliate disclosure

Native copy-trading with automated mirror-portfolio replication and public performance attribution.

BEST OVERALL5.0/10

eToro

Native copy-trading with automated mirror-portfolio replication and public performance attribution.

Free to sign up; no commissions on stocks

How it stacks up

  • Native copy-trading

    vs Public.com social investing

  • Smart Portfolios

    vs Moomoo social-trading

  • Public performance

    vs Robinhood mainstream

#2
Public2.8/10

From $10/mo

View
#3
Moomoo2.7/10

From $6.99/mo

View

All picks at a glance

#PickBest forStartingScore
1eToroBest copy-trading platform with native mirror-portfolio mechanicsFree5.0/10
2PublicBest social-investing platform with public portfolios and member discussions$10.00/mo2.8/10
3MoomooBest social-trading platform with Asian markets and community feeds$6.99/mo2.7/10
4RobinhoodBest mainstream trading platform without native copy-trading$5.00/mo2.5/10

Quick pick by use case

If you only have thirty seconds, find your situation below and skip to that pick.

Compare all 4 picks

Top spec
#1eToro5.0/10FreeNative copy-trading
#2Public2.8/10$10.00/mo$96.00/yr$108/yr morePublic portfolios
#3Moomoo2.7/10$6.99/mo$83.88/yr$71.88/yr moreSocial-trading feeds
#4Robinhood2.5/10$5.00/mo$50.00/yr$48/yr moreMainstream UI
#1

eToro

5.0/10

Best copy-trading platform with native mirror-portfolio mechanics

Native copy-trading with automated mirror-portfolio replication and public performance attribution.

PlanMonthlyWhat you get
FreeFreeCommission-free stocks plus the CopyTrader social trading feature with no monthly fee
eToro ClubFreeBalance-based tier (Silver from $5K through Diamond at $250K+); reduced spreads and account manager

eToro is the right pick when the goal is automated copy trading with native mirror-portfolio mechanics built into the platform. Founded in 2007 in Tel Aviv, eToro built the social-trading category with the CopyTrader mechanism that automatically replicates selected traders' positions in real time across stocks, ETFs, crypto, and currencies.

The wedge for copy-trading readers is the native automation. Where Public.com and Moomoo ship social feeds with public portfolios for manual reference, eToro replicates trades automatically; allocate capital to a trader and the platform mirrors their entry and exit decisions in real time. Public performance attribution shows historical returns, risk metrics, and trade history for vetting traders before allocation. Smart Portfolios bundle pre-built copy-trading strategies organized by theme like cybersecurity stocks or renewable energy.

The trade-off is US-market constraints. Regulatory rules in some jurisdictions limit certain copy-trading features for US users compared to international markets; verify current eToro US offering against the international platform before committing. For copy-trading as a primary workflow, eToro is the right call; for social investing with manual allocation, Public.com or Moomoo fit different needs.

Pros

  • Native CopyTrader mechanism replicates selected traders’ positions automatically
  • Public performance attribution with historical returns and risk metrics for vetting
  • Smart Portfolios bundle pre-built copy-trading strategies by theme
  • Founded 2007 in Tel Aviv; the most-developed copy-trading platform at scale
  • Multi-asset coverage including stocks, ETFs, crypto, and currencies on one platform

Cons

  • US-market features may differ from international platform; verify regional offering
  • Copy-trading replication has slippage; mirror trades execute at market prices not original entry
Native copy-tradingSmart PortfoliosPublic performanceFree to sign up; no commissions on stocks

Best for: Investors who want native automated copy-trading with selected traders mirrored in real time alongside public performance attribution for vetting.

Fees
7
Execution
8
UX
9
Value
8
Support
8
#2

Public

2.8/10$108/yr more

Best social-investing platform with public portfolios and member discussions

Social-investing community with public member portfolios and discussion feeds; founded 2017.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeCommission-free stocks, ETFs, crypto, Treasuries, bonds, and alts under one account
Public Premium$10.00/mo$96.00/yrAdds AI-powered insights, advanced analytics, and Morningstar institutional research

Public.com is the right pick when the goal is social investing through public portfolio visibility and member discussion rather than native copy-trading. Founded in 2017 in New York, Public built around the social-investing model where members can see public portfolios, follow allocations, and discuss positions in transparent member feeds tied to real holdings.

The wedge for social-investing readers is the public-allocation feed. Where eToro automates the mirror-portfolio mechanic, Public surfaces what other members actually hold with allocation visibility but stops short of automated replication; users decide whether to allocate manually based on the social signal. Multi-asset coverage includes stocks, ETFs, Treasuries, crypto, and alternatives like collectibles and music royalties on one platform. Educational content is integrated into the trading flow.

The trade-off is automation. Public lacks the native copy-trading mechanism that eToro ships; the social feed informs decisions rather than executes them. For investors who want social signal and public-allocation visibility while keeping manual control over trades, Public is the right call; for true copy-trading with automated replication, eToro fits better.

Pros

  • Public member portfolios with allocation visibility for social-signal informed decisions
  • Multi-asset coverage including stocks, ETFs, Treasuries, crypto, and alternatives
  • Educational content integrated into the trading flow rather than buried in a help center
  • Founded 2017 in New York; the most-developed social-investing platform at scale in the US
  • Transparent payment-for-order-flow disclosure on every trade

Cons

  • No native automated copy-trading; users decide whether to allocate manually based on social signal
  • Asset depth thinner than dedicated brokers on advanced order types and options
Public portfoliosMulti-asset coverageNo automated copyFree to sign up; no commissions

Best for: Investors who want social signal through public-allocation visibility and member discussions while keeping manual control over trades.

Fees
7
Execution
8
UX
9
Value
8
Support
7
#3

Moomoo

2.7/10$71.88/yr more

Best social-trading platform with Asian markets and community feeds

Social-trading community with member discussion feeds alongside Asian markets coverage and Level II quotes.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeCommission-free US trading plus Asian markets coverage and free Level II quotes
Moomoo Plus$6.99/mo$83.88/yrPremium real-time data and pre-market plus extended hours feeds

Moomoo is the right pick when the goal is social trading with Asian-markets coverage and active-trader tooling alongside the social feed. Founded in 2018 as the international arm of Futu Holdings, Moomoo built the trader-focused platform with social-feed features pulling from the broader Futu user base across multiple Asian markets.

The wedge for social-trading readers is the cross-market social signal. Where eToro and Public focus primarily on US-and-EU social trading, Moomoo's social feeds include Asian-market activity and Hong Kong and Singapore-based members alongside US users. Free Level II quotes on US markets, advanced charting, and direct access to Hong Kong and Singapore exchanges round out the platform for traders who follow international momentum and social signal together.

The trade-off is native copy-trading mechanics. Moomoo's social features surface community activity but lack the automated mirror-portfolio replication eToro ships. For traders who want social signal alongside Asian-markets coverage and active-trader tooling, Moomoo is the right call; for native copy-trading, eToro is required; for US-only social investing, Public.com fits.

Pros

  • Social-trading community with member discussion feeds tied to real allocations
  • Asian markets coverage includes direct Hong Kong and Singapore exchange access
  • Free Level II quotes alongside the social feed for active-trader workflows
  • Founded 2018 as international arm of Futu Holdings; largest Asia-focused social-trading platform
  • Advanced charting tooling integrates with the social feed for technical-analysis discussions

Cons

  • No native automated copy-trading mechanics comparable to eToro
  • US-market user base smaller than Public.com despite social-feed depth
Social-trading feedsAsian marketsLevel II quotesFree to sign up; no commissions on US stocks

Best for: Traders who want social signal alongside Asian-markets coverage and active-trader tooling like Level II quotes and advanced charting.

Fees
7
Execution
9
UX
8
Value
9
Support
7
#4

Robinhood

2.5/10$48/yr more

Best mainstream trading platform without native copy-trading

Mainstream commission-free trading with broader app reach but no native copy-trading mechanics.

PlanMonthlyAnnualWhat you get
FreeFreeCommission-free stocks, ETFs, options, crypto, and IRA with the standard data feed
Robinhood Gold$5.00/mo$50.00/yrAdds margin investing, Level II quotes, 4% APY on uninvested cash, and bigger instant deposits

Robinhood is the right pick when the goal is mainstream commission-free trading with broad app reach and no specific need for copy-trading mechanics. Founded in 2013 by Vlad Tenev and Baiju Bhatt, Robinhood pioneered commission-free trading and reaches a substantial user base in the US, but the platform does not ship native automated copy-trading.

The wedge for casual social-trading readers is the mainstream brand familiarity. Where eToro, Public.com, and Moomoo build social features into the core product, Robinhood treats trading as primarily individual; community discussions live outside the platform on third-party forums. For users who want commission-free trading without copy-trading dependency, Robinhood ships the cleanest UI and largest US user base in the lineup.

The trade-off is the social-trading feature gap. Robinhood lacks both native copy-trading (eToro) and public-portfolio social feeds (Public.com). For investors who specifically want copy-trading or social-signal investing as their primary workflow, the other three picks deliver more; Robinhood is included here as the mainstream baseline for users evaluating whether copy-trading mechanics are worth the platform switch.

Pros

  • Mainstream commission-free trading with the cleanest UI for first-time users
  • Largest US-user-base brokerage among the social-trading-adjacent picks
  • Pioneered commission-free trading in 2013; mainstream brand recognition
  • Robinhood Gold subscription adds margin, instant deposits, and APY on cash
  • Founded 2013 by Vlad Tenev and Baiju Bhatt in Menlo Park

Cons

  • No native copy-trading mechanics or public-portfolio social feeds
  • Community discussions live on third-party forums outside the platform
Mainstream UINo copy-tradingLargest US user baseFree to sign up; no commissions

Best for: Mainstream investors who want commission-free trading without specific copy-trading dependency and may use third-party social channels for signal.

Fees
7
Execution
9
UX
10
Value
8
Support
7

How we picked

Each pick gets a transparent composite score from price, features, free-tier availability, and editor fit. Pricing flows from our live database, so when a vendor changes prices the score updates here too.

Copy-trading framework: native automated mirror-portfolio mechanics, social-feed depth with public performance attribution, broker-side allocation rules in regulated accounts, and integration with the broader trading workflow. See parent /best/trading-platforms for full multi-asset coverage including Webull, Tastytrade, Trade Republic, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab.

We don't claim "30,000 hours of testing." Our methodology is the formula above plus the editor's published verdict for each pick. Verifiable, auditable, and updated when the underlying data changes.

Why trust Subrupt

We're a subscription tracker first, a buying guide second. Every claim on this page is something you can check.

By use case

Best native automated copy-trading

eToro

Read the full review →

Best social-investing with public portfolios

Public

Read the full review →

Best social-trading with Asian markets

Moomoo

Read the full review →

Best mainstream without copy-trading

Robinhood

Read the full review →

Didn't make the list

Cut because the platform is active-trader first rather than copy-trading first; community discussion is thinner than Moomoo or Public. Best for active-trader workflows with free Level II quotes.

Cut because the options-specialist focus does not include copy-trading or social-feed mechanics. Best for active options traders with $1-to-open and $0-to-close pricing.

Cut because the EU mobile neobroker focuses on euro flat trades rather than copy-trading. Best for European traders wanting one-euro flat per-trade pricing across EU markets.

How to choose your Copy-Trading Platforms

Native copy-trading vs social-feed-only platforms

The most load-bearing decision for copy-trading readers is whether to pick a platform with native automated mirror-portfolio mechanics or a social-feed platform that informs manual decisions. Native copy-trading (eToro CopyTrader) replicates selected traders' positions automatically in real time; allocate capital to a trader and the platform mirrors their entry and exit decisions. Social-feed platforms (Public.com, Moomoo) ship public-portfolio visibility and member discussions but stop short of automated replication; users decide whether to allocate manually based on the social signal. The honest framework: pick eToro when copy-trading automation is the load-bearing feature; pick Public.com or Moomoo when social signal informs manual decisions and platform features beyond copy-trading matter.

Public performance attribution and trader-vetting workflows

Vetting traders before allocation is the load-bearing workflow for copy-trading readers. eToro publishes historical returns, risk metrics, drawdown history, and trade history for traders running CopyTrader-eligible strategies. Public.com surfaces public member portfolios with allocation visibility but lacks the formalized risk metrics eToro provides. Moomoo social feeds show community activity but performance attribution is less standardized than eToro. The honest framework: copy-trading platforms compete on the depth and credibility of public performance attribution; eToro leads on this dimension. Vetting requires looking at multi-year drawdowns and risk-adjusted returns rather than recent quarterly performance; recent winners may not survive the next downturn.

When to look beyond copy-trading-fit picks (cross-link to parent)

Three patterns push readers beyond the copy-trading-fit lineup. First, options-trading workflows where Tastytrade and Webull deliver options-specialist tooling that copy-trading platforms do not match. Second, day-trading workflows requiring deep Level II quotes and pre-market session access where Webull free tooling beats the social-feed platforms. Third, European market access through Trade Republic for users trading from EU accounts. See [our /best/trading-platforms guide](/best/trading-platforms) for the full lineup including Webull, Tastytrade, Trade Republic, Fidelity, and Charles Schwab. The migration trigger should be a specific feature the copy-trading-fit lineup cannot deliver.

Frequently asked questions

Why is eToro ranked first for copy-trading instead of Public.com?

eToro ships native automated copy-trading with the CopyTrader mechanism that replicates selected traders’ positions automatically in real time. Public.com ships social feeds with public-portfolio visibility but lacks automated replication; users allocate manually based on the social signal. We rank Public.com second because the social-feed depth is meaningful for users who want manual control, but for true copy-trading the native mechanism wins.

How does eToro CopyTrader actually work in practice?

You allocate capital to a selected trader through CopyTrader; the platform replicates that trader’s positions automatically in your account at proportional allocation. When the trader opens or closes, your account mirrors. Public performance attribution lets you see historical returns and risk metrics before allocating. Slippage applies because mirror trades execute at market prices when replication triggers.

Is copy-trading available to US users on eToro?

eToro offers a US-licensed brokerage entity that may have different feature availability than the international platform. Some copy-trading features available in the EU or other regions may be limited or modified for US users due to regulatory rules. Verify the current US offering on the eToro US site before committing to a copy-trading workflow; international users have access to the full platform.

Are Public.com public portfolios actually their real holdings?

Yes. Members can choose to make portfolios visible publicly; published portfolios show real holdings with allocation percentages. The social feed includes discussions of recent trades alongside the portfolios. Privacy controls let members choose what portion of activity is public; the social signal is genuine for members who opt into public visibility.

How is Moomoo social trading different from Public.com?

Moomoo social trading includes Asian-market activity from the broader Futu user base alongside US users; Public focuses on US-and-EU social investing. Moomoo pairs the feed with active-trader tooling like free Level II and direct Asian-exchange access. Public prioritizes social-investing breadth across stocks, Treasuries, crypto, and alternatives. Pick based on whether Asian markets and active-trader tooling matter.

Should I copy-trade with my full portfolio or only a slice?

Most experienced copy-trading users allocate only a slice of their portfolio rather than the full balance. Diversification across two or three traders with different strategies reduces single-trader risk. The remaining portfolio holds long-term or self-directed allocations. Vetting requires looking at multi-year drawdowns rather than recent quarterly performance.

Does Subrupt earn a commission from any copy-trading picks?

Subrupt earns affiliate commission only on paid conversions on programs we partner with. The FTC disclosure block at the top of every guide names which picks have current click-tracking partnerships. Composite ranking weights price 40 percent, features 30, free tier 15, fit 15 with no tuning by affiliate rate. Picks without a partnership appear in the lineup based on copy-trading fit only.

How often is this copy-trading guide updated?

We refresh copy-trading guides quarterly with mid-year passes when major vendor announcements happen. Triggers for an update include eToro CopyTrader feature changes, Public.com social-investing updates, Moomoo Asian-market expansion, and Robinhood feature launches. The lastReviewed date at the top reflects the most recent editorial sweep. Verify current copy-trading availability and US-region features on the vendor site before signing up.

Subrupt Editorial

The team behind subrupt.com. We track subscriptions, surface cheaper alternatives, and publish buying guides where the score formula is on the page so you can recompute it yourself. We do not claim 30,000 hours of testing. What we claim is live pricing from our database, a transparent composite score, and honest savings math against a category baseline.

Last reviewed

Citations

Affiliate disclosure: Subrupt earns a commission when you switch to a service through our recommendation links. This never changes the price you pay. We only recommend services where there's a real cost or feature advantage for you, and our picks are based on the data on this page, not on which programs pay the most.

Related buying guides

Track your subscriptions on Subrupt

Add the Copy-Trading Platforms you pay for and see how much you'd save by switching.

Open dashboard

More buying guides

Independent rankings for the subscriptions worth paying for.

See all guides